Communication
ChemComm
Scientific Research (C) (No. 26410094) and Scientific Research
(A) (No. 25248019) from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
Notes and references
1 E. A. Meyer, R. K. Castellano and F. Diederich, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2003, 42, 1210and references therein.
2 W. L. Jorgensen and D. L. Severance, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990,
112, 4768.
3 (a) H. W. Roesky and M. Andruh, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2003, 236, 91;
(b) S. L. Cockroft, C. A. Hunter, K. R. Lawson, J. Perkins and
C. J. Urch, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 8594.
4 A. Robertson, M. Ikeda, M. Takeuchi and S. Shinkai, Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn., 2001, 74, 883.
5 (a) R.-H. Yang, W.-H. Chan, A. W. M. Lee, P.-F. Xia, H.-K. Zhang and
K. A. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 2884; (b) M. Licchelli, L. Linati,
A. O. Biroli, E. Perani, A. Poggi and D. Sacchi, Chem. – Eur. J., 2002,
8, 5161; (c) B. Bodenant, F. Fages and M.-H. Delville, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1998, 120, 7511; (d) H. J. Kim, J. Hong, A. Hong, S. Ham,
J. H. Lee and J. S. Kim, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 1963; (e) S. Malkondu,
D. Turhan and A. Kocak, Tetrahedron Lett., 2015, 56, 162;
( f ) M. Shellaiah, Y. H. Wu, A. Singh, M. V. Ramakrishnam Raju
and H. C. Lin, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 1310; (g) L. Tang, D. Wu,
X. Wen, X. Dai and K. Zhong, Tetrahedron, 2014, 70, 9118.
6 (a) J. Yuasa and S. Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 12912;
(b) J. Yuasa, T. Suenobu and S. Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003,
125, 12090; (c) J. Yuasa, T. Suenobu and S. Fukuzumi, ChemPhysChem,
2006, 7, 942.
7 S. Sato, R. Takeuchi, M. Yagi-Utsumi, T. Yamaguchi, Y. Yamaguchi,
K. Kato and M. Fujita, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 2540.
8 (a) T. Ogawa, J. Yuasa and T. Kawai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010,
49, 5110; (b) N. Inukai, J. Yuasa and T. Kawai, Chem. Commun., 2010,
46, 3929; (c) N. Inukai, T. Kawai and J. Yuasa, Chem. – Eur. J., 2014,
20, 15159.
Fig. 4 Normalized emission spectra of LH (2.0 Â 10À4 M) in the presence
of Zn2+ (a) (1.0 Â 10À4 M), (b) (1.8 Â 10À4 M), and (c) (1.0 Â 10À2 M) in
methanol at 203–333 K. Excitation wavelength: l = 340 nm. Plots of
relative emission intensity (d), (e) (I464/I390), and (f) (I464/I443) vs. T.
(g) Estimated DG00, DG20, and DG40. The spectra are normalized at (a) and
(b) 390 nm and at (c) 443 nm (for non-normalized spectra, see ESI,† S7).
(tight dimer contact, see ESI,† S8). On the other hand, the
temperature dependent change in the intensity ratio of the
monomer fluorescence and the excimer emission observed at
0.5 and 0.9 equivalents of Zn2+ (Fig. 4d and e, respectively) is
likely obtainable with ÀDG00 and ÀDG20 = 3–7 kcal molÀ1 (loose
dimer contact, see ESI,† S8). The LH sample containing
0.9 equivalents of Zn2+shows a higher intensity ratio of excimer
emission at 203 K (Fig. 4a) as compared to that containing
0.5 equivalents of Zn2+ (Fig. 4b), indicating that ÀDG02 is slightly
9 Carbazole derivatives have been extensively utilized as building
blocks for metal–ligand directed self-assembly, see: J.-R. Li and
H.-C. Zhou, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 893.
10 C. Nie, Q. Zhang, H. Ding, B. Huang, X. Wang, X. Zhao, S. Li,
H. Zhou, J. Wu and Y. Tian, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 599.
larger than ÀDG00. The estimated ÀDG0 values (Fig. 4g) are con- 11 (a) J. Yuasa, A. Mitsui and T. Kawai, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 5807;
(b) N. Inukai, T. Kawai and J. Yuasa, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 9128;
siderably higher than typical aromatic–aromatic interactions
(c) N. Inukai, T. Kawai and J. Yuasa, Chem. – Eur. J., 2013, 19, 5938.
(ca. 2.4 kcal molÀ1),2 suggesting that the metal–ligand interactions
12 Ohkita et al. extensively studied excimer formation in rigid carb-
between Zn2+ and the imidazole moieties mainly contribute to the
stability of the stacking arrangements. In contrast, the stabilization
energy of the carbazole excimer should depend on the distance
azolophane, see: H. Ohkita, S. Ito, M. Yamamoto, Y. Tohda and
K. Tani, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2002, 106, 2140.
13 Excitation spectra recorded at 392 and 450 nm are almost identical
to the absorption spectra (see ESI† S3).
between the carbazole rings in the face-to-face position. In such a 14 No appreciable change in excimer emission maxima was observed
case, the coordination arrangements around Zn2+ largely contribute
during the titration (Fig. 1c and d), indicating no significant change
in the stabilization energy of the carbazole excimer. The term ‘‘loose
and tight dimer contacts’’ used in this study denotes the thermo-
to the stabilization energy of the carbazole excimer.14
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the efficiency of the metal-
ion clip method in fine-tuning aromatic stacking interactions.
Sequential binding of Zn2+ to the imidazole moieties bridges
the two preorganized complexes [(LÀ)2(Zn2+)m] and strengthens
the stacking interaction between the carbazole rings in stages.
This approach then becomes of interest in finding a way to
control aromatic stacking interactions, enabling ‘‘loose’’ and
‘‘tight’’ dimer contacts between the aromatic rings.
dynamic stability of the stacking arrangements (mainly due to the
metal–ligand interactions).
15 LH (2.0 Â 10À2 M) shows line broadening in NMR spectrum upon
addition of 0–0.2 equivalents of Zn2+in CD3OD, where the aromatic
protons of the carbazole ring (C1–H and C4–H) show upfield shifts
(see ESI† S4). The upfield shifts clearly suggest the shielding effects
of the carbazole rings, a clear indication of the stacked carbazole
units. In addition, the diffusion coefficient of LH (D = 8.8 Æ 0.4 Â
10À10 m2 sÀ1) decreases significantly (D = 4.3 Æ 0.8 Â 10À10 m2 sÀ1
)
in the presence of Zn2+, indicating that the size of the stacked
complex is larger than the unstacked complex. Precipitation was
observed at the higher Zn2+ concentrations under these conditions
due to low solubility of the stacked complexes in CD3OD.
This work was partly supported by JST-PRESTO ‘‘Molecular
technology and creation of new functions’’, a Grant-in-Aid for
Chem. Commun.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015