phenylheptacene. These are C2V symmetric cis,cis-trisadduct
, C2V symmetric trans,trans-trisadduct 8 and C symmetric
2
s
cis,trans-trisadduct 9. The reaction is highly diastereoselec-
1
tive for only one of these compounds. A H NMR spectrum
of the pure product reveals a molecule with C2V symmetry,
thereby eliminating compound 9 from consideration. Thus,
two methine singlets integrating for 4 and 2 protons are
observed at 5.69 and 5.80 ppm, respectively, confirming three
[
60]fullerene cycloadditions and two planes of symmetry.
1
The only other H NMR signals attributable to the heptacene
backbone are a single set of AA′MM′ signals at 7.45 and
7
.53 ppm. These can only correspond to the two equivalent,
terminal benzene rings of the heptacene backbone. Conse-
quently, 3 equiv of [60]fullerene must cycloadd across the
(
C5,C18), (C7,C16), and (C9,C14) carbons of heptacene 4.
A total of 63 C NMR signals are expected for either 2
1
3
or 8. These include 32 signals for the terminal [60]fullerene
moieties, 17 signals for the central [60]fullerene moiety, 8
signals for the heptacene backbone, and 6 signals for the
13
phenyl substituents (slowly rotating, vide infra). A C NMR
3
spectrum of pure product reveals four unique sp carbons.
These are assigned to the two unique methine carbons on
the heptacene backbone (52.2 and 55.1 ppm) and two unique
quaternary carbons on the [60]fullerene skeletons (72.1 and
1
3
7
2.5 ppm). A total of 53 distinct C signals are observed in
2
the sp region between 125 and 156 ppm, whereas 59 signals
are expected. A close examination of this congested region
indicates several shoulders alongside discernible signals,
indicating instances of coincidental overlap.
MM2 calculations have proven to be a valuable and
convenient tool for comparing diastereomeric bis[60]fullerene
6
Figure 2. Relative MM2 strain energies (kcal/mol) for C2V
symmetric cis,cis-trisadduct 2 (top), C2V symmetric trans,trans-
adducts of 6,13-disubstituted pentacenes. They fare far better
in this regard than either AM1 or PM3 semiempirical
s
trisadduct 8 (middle), and C symmetric cis,trans-trisadduct 9
15
calculations, presumably because the latter do not consider
van der Waals forces. Compared to 8 and 9, compound 2
maximizes [60]fullerene-[60]fullerene π-stacking interac-
tions and is predicted by MM2 calculations to be the
thermodynamically preferred isomer (Figure 2).
Further evidence for formation of a cis,cis structure (i.e.,
) comes from a careful examination of the H NMR
spectrum for the pure product. As in the case of cis-bisadduct
(bottom).
reaction mixture reveals a reasonably clean transformation
to trisadduct 2. Minor byproduct signals are observed and
appear to be consistent with oligomerization reactions in
which, for example, a single [60]fullerene bridges two
acenes.
1
2
4
,5
1
1
,
five separate phenyl H NMR signals are observed,
13
As expected, a C NMR spectrum indicated the presence
of excess [60]fullerene in the crude reaction mixture.
Isolating trisadduct 2 from the excess [60]fullerene proved
to be difficult. TLC analyses indicate that trisadduct 2 and
indicating slow rotation of the phenyl groups on the NMR
time scale. One set of ortho protons gives rise to a quasi-
doublet at 6.86 ppm and is considerably shielded compared
(14) NMR data for 2: 1H NMR (CS /CDCl ) δ 5.69 (s, 4H), 5.80 (s,
[60]fullerene have nearly identical retention behaviors on
2
3
2
7
7
H), 6.84-6.87 (m, 4H), 7.05-7.09 (m, 4H), 7.32-7.37 (m, 4H), 7.41-
silica under all solvent conditions tested. Consequently, silica
column chromatography is complicated by coelution of
13
.47 (m, 8H), 7.49-7.56 (m, 8H); C NMR (CS2/CDCl3) δ 52.16, 55.09,
2.12, 72.47, 125.55, 127.24, 127.58, 128.20, 128.42, 128.70, 129.19,
[
60]fullerene and 2. Compound 2 was eventually obtained
129.90, 136.20, 136.59, 136.72, 136.86, 138.82, 138.84, 139.57, 139.79,
1
1
39.83, 141.35, 141.48, 141.57, 141.81, 141.82, 141.85, 141.88, 141.94,
42.32, 142.35, 142.40, 142.41, 142.44, 142.48, 142.54, 142.76, 144.42,
14
pure, albeit in a modest 20% isolated yield, via successive
runs on a flash silica column with neat CS as the eluant.
2
144.46, 144.50, 145.06, 145.10, 145.12, 145.18, 145.22, 145.44, 145.45,
1
1
45.95, 145.98, 146.00, 146.22, 146.26, 146.27, 147.30, 147.32, 154.96,
55.46.
(15) MM2 calculations correctly predict that cis-bis[60]fullerene adduct
is preferred to the corresponding trans isomer. Moreover, the 3.08 Å
In principle, three tris[60]fullerene adducts can form
Figure 2) upon reacting [60]fullerene with 6,8,15,17-tetra-
(
1
(
atoms of closest contact) and 9.84 Å (fullerene centroid-to-centroid)
(
13) (a) Birks, J. B.; Appleyard, J. H.; Pope, R. Photochem. Photobiol.
distances between adjacent [60]fullerenes predicted by MM2 are remarkably
close to the 3.065 and 9.805 Å distances observed in the X-ray structure of
1. AM1 and PM3 calculations place the atoms of closest contact on adjacent
[60]fullerenes ∼4.2 Å apart and the fullerene centroid-to-centroid distance
at ∼10.9 Å. See ref 3 for more details.
1
(
963, 2, 493. (b) Clar, E.; Macpherson, I. A. Tetrahedron 1962, 18, 1411.
c) Bowen, E. J.; Tanner, D. W. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1955, 51, 475. (d)
Coulson, C. A.; Orgel, L. E.; Taylor, W.; Weiss, J. J. Chem. Soc. 1955,
961.
2
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 22, 2003
4205