Article
Bhattacharya and Biswas
þ
3
.5 mmol) and CuI (667 mg, 3.5 mmol) were added, and the
reaction mixture was stirred for 8 h at room temperature. After
h, MeOH was evaporated and the reaction mixture was diluted
with CHCl . The organic layer was washed with saturated aqu-
eous KHSO
7.19 (4H, s). ESI-MS calcd for [C65
found: 1211.6624.
H N O
112 12 8
þ Na ]: 1212.6506;
8
2.3. Computational Studies. An optimization of the energy-
minimized structure of each click chemistry based triazole adduct
was performed using Gaussian 98 program and RHF/6-31G*
level of theory. The ball-stick structure of each molecule was
drawn using Gauss View software, and then the coordinates of
these structures were taken and run in Gaussian 98 to get the opti-
mized geometry. The distance between the “head” to the “tail”
3
4
solution (3 ꢀ 20 mL), water (20 mL), and saturated
1
4
brine solution (20 mL). Finally, the organic layer was separated
and dried over anhydrous Na SO . The solvent was removed us-
2
4
ing a rotary evaporator, and the product was purified by column
chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of CHCl and MeOH
v/v = 96:4] to afford a white solid, 158 mg (0.51 mmol, 73.0%). IR
3
1
5
[
carbon atom was determined using ChemCraft software.
-1
1
(
neat) (cm ): 2924, 2852, 1739, and 1625. H NMR (CDCl , 300
3
2.4. Aggregate Preparation. Each adduct was dissolved in
chloroform in separate autoclaved glass vial. Thin film was made
by evaporation of the organic solvent under a steady stream of
dry nitrogen. The lasttraces of chloroformwereremoved bykeep-
ing the film under vacuum overnight. Freshly autoclaved water
(Milli-Q) or particular buffer was added to the individual film
such that the final concentration of the adduct was maintained
at ∼1 mM. The mixtures werekept for hydration at 4 °C for 6-8 h
and were repeatedly freeze-thawed (ice-cold water to 70 °C) with
intermittent vortexing to ensure optimal hydration. Sonication of
these suspensions for 15 min in a bath sonicator at 70 °C afforded
approximately spherical aggregates as evidenced from transmis-
sion electron microscopy. The aggregates were prepared and kept
under sterile conditions. The aggregates were found to be stable
even after keeping them for more than 1 month.
MHz): δ 0.81-0.86 (3H, t), 1.23 (16H, m), 1.81-1.85 (5H, m),
2.23-2.8 (2H, t), 4.24-4.29 (2H, q), 5.14 (2H, s), 7.52 (1H, s). ESI-
þ
MS calcd for [C H N O þ Na ]: 332.4368; found: 332.2314.
17
31
3 2
1
-Tetradecyl-1H-[1,2,3]triazol-4-yl-methyl Dodecanoate (M2).
Compound 3 (50 mg, 0.21 mmol) was added to a solution of com-
pound 1 (50 mg, 0.21 mmol) in MeOH (6 mL) in a round-bottom
flask. After that, DIEA (136 mg, 1.05 mmol) and CuI (200 mg,
1
8
.05 mmol) were added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for
h at room temperature. After 8 h, MeOH was evaporated and
3
the reaction mixture was diluted with CHCl . The organic layer
was washed with saturated KHSO (3 ꢀ 20 mL), water (20 mL),
4
and saturated brine solution (20 mL). Finally, the organic layer
2 4
was separated and dried over anhydrous Na SO . The solvent was
removed using a rotary evaporator, and the product was purified
by column chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of
CHCl and MeOH [v/v = 96:4] to afford a white solid, 78 mg
2.5. pK Measurements of Click Adduct Aggregates.
a
UV-vis spectra of the aggregate of each click adduct in aqueous
3
-1
media or media of different acidities (by adding solutions of H SO )
were recorded using Shimadzu UV-2100 spectrophotometer at
2
4
(
0.16 mmol, 78.0%). IR (neat) (cm ): 2929, 2868, 1743, and 1632.
1
H NMR (CDCl , 300 MHz): δ 0.81-0.86 (6H, t), 1.23 (38H, m),
3
2
5 °C. Then the ratios of absorbance maxima before and after
1
.85-1.90 (4H, m), 2.27-2.32 (2H, t), 4.29-4.34 (2H, q), 5.19
þ
protonation of triazole groups in the aggregates of each click ad-
duct of each spectrum were plotted against the pH of the media.
The pointsobtained werefitted (Boltzmann) using Origin8.0 soft-
(
5
2H, s), 7.56 (1H, s). ESI-MS calcd for [C H N O þ Na ]:
29
55
3 2
00.7558; found: 500.4192.
-[3-(4-Dodecanoyloxymethyl-[1,2,3]triazol-1-yl)-propyl]-
H-[1,2,3]triazol-4-yl-methyl Dodecanoate (D1). Compound 4
1
a
ware, and from the break we obtained the pK value of the aggre-
gates of each click adduct.
1
(
0
50 mg, 0.40 mmol) was added to a solution of compound 1(191mg,
.80 mmol) in MeOH (6 mL) in a round-bottom flask. After that,
2.6. Dye Entrapment Studies. Films of a given click adduct
were prepared as described above and an appropriate amount
of 0.1 mM methylene blue (MB) (λmax = 665 nm) was added such
that eachclick adduct concentration was 5 mM. A 2 mL aliquot of
the resulting click adduct suspension was loaded on to a column
packed with pre-equilibrated Sephadex G-50. Gel filtration was
performed using freshly autoclaved water (Milli-Q) as the eluent
until elution of free dye was complete. Neat Triton-X-100 was
added to aliquots of fractions to give a 1 wt % concentration of
Triton X 100, and the vesicles were lysed by bath sonication of the
resulting solution for 2 min at room temperature. The absor-
bances at 665 nm for all the fractions containing lysed solutions
was determined and plotted against the elution volume.
DIEA (517 mg, 4.00 mmol) and CuI (762 mg, 4.00 mmol) were
added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 8 h at room tem-
perature. After 8 h, solvent was evaporated from the reactionmix-
ture and the residue was dissolved in CHCl
was washed with saturated KHSO
(3 ꢀ 20 mL), water (20 mL),
and saturated brine (20 mL). Finally, the organic layer was sepa-
rated and dried over anhydrous Na SO . The solvent was removed
using a rotary evaporator, and theproduct was purifiedby column
chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of CHCl and
MeOH [v/v = 94:6] to furnish a white solid, 167 mg (0.28 mmol,
3
. The organic layer
4
2
4
3
-1
1
7
0.0%). IR (neat) (cm ): 2934, 2854, 1726, and 1630. H NMR
(
(
CDCl , 300 MHz): δ 0.81-0.86 (6H, t), 1.23 (32H, m), 1.68-1.76
3
2.7. Transmission Electron Microscopy. The aqueous ag-
4H, m), 2.25-2.30 (6H, m), 3.72-3.83 (4H, d), 5.34 (4H, s), 7.26
þ
gregatesoftheadducts(1 mM) were examinedundertransmission
electron microscopy by negative staining using 0.5% uranyl ace-
tate. A 10 μL sample of the suspension was loaded onto Formvar-
coated, 400 mesh copper grids and allowed to remain for 1 min.
Excess fluid was removed from the grids by touching their edges
with filter paper, and 10 μL of 0.1% uranyl acetate was applied on
the same grid after which the excess stain was similarly removed
from the grids. First, the grids were air-dried, and then the last
traces of water were removed under vacuum. The samples were
observed under TEM (TECNAI T20) operating at an accelera-
tion voltage (dc voltage) of 100 keV. Micrographs were recorded
at a magnification of 10000-80000ꢀ.
(
6
2H, s). ESI-MS calcd for [C H N O þ Na ]: 625.8414; found:
3
3
58
6
4
25.4417.
1
-[3-(4-Dodecanoyloxymethyl-[1,2,3]triazol-1-yl)-2,2-bis(4-
dodecanoyloxymethyl-[1,2,3]triazol-1-yl-methyl)propyl]-1H-[1,
,3]triazol-4-yl-methyl Dodecanoate (T1). Compound 5 (50 mg,
.21 mmol) was added to a solution of compound 1 (200 mg, 0.84
2
0
mmol) in MeOH (6 mL) in a round-bottomed flask. After that,
DIEA (543 mg, 4.2 mmol) and CuI (800 mg, 4.2 mmol) were ad-
ded, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 8 h at room tem-
perature. After 8 h, solvent was evaporated from the reactionmix-
ture and the residue was dissolved in CHCl . The organic layer
3
was washed with saturated KHSO
and saturated brine (20 mL). Finally, the organic layer was sepa-
rated and dried over anhydrous Na SO . The solvent was removed
4
(3 ꢀ 20 mL), water (20 mL),
2.8. Dynamic Light Scattering. Unilamellar vesicles (1 mM)
prepared in buffered aqueous media (as mentioned under the
aggregate preparation) werediluted to 0.33 mM and were usedfor
dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements. DLS measurements
were performed at room temperature using a Malvern Zetasizer
2
4
using a rotary evaporator, and theproduct was purifiedby column
chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of CHCl and
MeOH [v/v = 92:8] to furnish a white solid, 166 mg (0.14 mmol,
3
-1
1
6
(
1
6.0%). IR (neat) (cm ): 2936, 2876, 1749, and 1634. H NMR
CDCl , 300 MHz): δ 0.83-0.88 (12H, t), 1.22 (64H, m),
.52-1.56 (8H, m), 2.23-2.28 (8H, t), 3.67 (8H, s), 5.24 (8H, s),
(
14) (a) Kumar, V. P.; Ganguly, B.; Bhattacharya, S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 8634.
b) Bhattacharya, S.; Vemula, P. K. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9677.
(15) Kress, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 7757.
3
(
1
584 DOI: 10.1021/la104851g
Langmuir 2011, 27(5), 1581–1591