+
15
uC at pH 5.5 in which a C GC base triple is formed. The
4
Notes and references
complex of TANA oligomer 15 with cRNA 22 was highly stable
compared to the DNA : RNA complex (24 : 22) and the stability
1
D. A. Braasch and D. R. Corey, Biochemistry, 2002, 41, 4503–4510;
P. E. Nielsen and M. Egholm, in Peptide Nucleic Acids (PNA).
Protocols and Applications, ed. P. E. Nielsen and M. Egholm, Horizon
Scientific, Norfolk, CT, 1999; S. T. Crooke, in Antisense Research and
Application, ed. S. T. Crooke, Springer, Berlin, 1998, vol. 131, pp. 1–50;
J. Kurreck, Eur. J. Biochem., 2003, 270, 1628–1644.
2
was comparable with that of aegPNA : RNA (20 : 22). The
formation of cDNA : TANA complexes was not observed. To test
the compatibility of the TANA backbone in aegPNA : TANA
mix-backbone oligomers, the sequences 17–19 were synthesized.
Sequence 17 has a TANA monomer unit at C-terminus, sequence
2 M. Manoharan, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1999, 1489, 117–130.
3
T. P. Prakash, M. Manoharan, A. M. Kawasaki, A. S. Fraser,
E. A. Lesnik, N. Sioufi, J. M. Leeds, M. Teplova and M. Egli,
Biochemistry, 2002, 41, 11642–11648.
1
8 has the modified unit at the central position and sequence 19 is
an alternate aeg-TANA sequence. All the complexes of oligomers
7–19 with RNA 22 were destabilized compared to the control
aegPNA : RNA complex 20 : 22. Contrary to the earlier reported
4 M. Petersen and J. Wengel, Trends Biotechnol., 2003, 21, 74–81.
5 E. Lescrinier, R. Esnouf, J. Schraml, R. Busson, H. A. Heus,
C. W. Hilbers and P. Herdewijn, Chem. Biol., 2000, 7, 719–731.
6
7
1
J. Summerton, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1999, 1489, 141–158.
P. E. Nielsen, M. Egholm, R. H. Berg and O. Buchardt, Science, 1991,
254, 1497–1500; P. E. Nielsen, M. Egholm and O. Buchardt,
Bioconjugate Chem., 1994, 5, 3–7.
V. A. Kumar, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 2021–2032; V. A. Kumar and
K. N. Ganesh, Acc. Chem. Res., 2005, 38, 404–412.
J. Wilds, G. Minasov, F. Natt, P. Von Matt, K.-H. Altamann and
M. Egli, Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 2001, 20, 991–994;
G. V. Petersen and J. Wengel, Tetrahedron, 1995, 51, 2145–2154;
A. Lauritsen and J. Wengel, Chem. Commun., 2002, 530–531; T. Vilaivan
and G. Lowe, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 9326–9327.
11
bepPNA backbone, the mixed backbone containing sugar amide
and aegPNA seems to be incompatible to form regular helical
structures and mixed backbone ODNs 17–19 show significant
decrease in binding with cRNA. The stability of the complexes of
homogeneous backbone TANA with RNA over DNA is a very
valuable result from an application perspective. The synthesis of
mixed purine–pyrimidine backbone sequences and the study of
compatibility of the TANA dimers in a regular phosphodiester
backbone will be interesting and the work in this direction is
currently in progress.
8
9
10 T. Govindaraju and V. A. Kumar, Chem. Commun., 2005, 495–497;
T. Govindaraju and V. A. Kumar, Tetrahedron, 2006, 60, 2321–2330.
11 S. M. Frier and K.-H. Altmann, Nucleic Acids Res., 1997, 25,
This communication presents the results of selective RNA
recognition by a homogeneous DNA analogue and the ease of its
synthesis that has potential to be extended to purine nucleosides.
The thio function in the backbone may have an additional
advantage for better bioavailability of these modified oligodeoxy-
4
429–4443.
12 C. Thibaudeau, J. Plavec, N. Garg, A. Papchikhin and
J. Chattopadhyaya, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 4038–4043.
3 M. Saneyoshi, T. Fujii, T. Kawagchi, K. Awai and S. Kimura, in
Nucleic Acids Chemistry, ed. L. B. Townsend and R. S. Tipson, Wiley,
New York, 1991, vol. 4, pp. 67–72.
14 K. J. Divakar and C. B. Reese, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1982,
1
3
ribonucleosides. The simplicity of the approach described here is
1
171–1176.
equally appealing as is the selectivity.
1
5 S. K. Kim, P. E. Nielsen, M. Egholm, O. Buchardt, R. H. Berg and
B. Norden, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 6477–6481.
16 P. Job, Ann. Chim., 1928, 9, 113–203.
K. G. thanks CSIR, New Delhi for a research fellowship.
V. A. K. thanks Director, NCL for financial assistance.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006
Chem. Commun., 2006, 2373–2375 | 2375