930
H. Hagiwara et al.
LETTER
Our initial efforts to protect as methylidene, cyclopentyl-
idene, and cyclohexylidene acetals, or bis-MOM or bis-
TES ether at C-6 and C-7 gave no satisfactory results in
either protection or deprotection. Some protecting groups
were fragile for further transformations and others resist-
ed deprotection. Strongly acidic reaction conditions had to
be avoided due to side reactions such as opening of the tet-
rahydropyran ring.
AcO
AcO
HO
HO
O
O
i
ii
H
H
OR
OH
H
H
OAc
OH
3 R = H
4 R = Ac
9
O
O
To resolve this issue, we chose carbonate group among
other possible protecting groups of 1,2-diols, which was
expected to be stable under aprotic basic reaction condi-
tions and could be hydrolyzed easily under protic basic re-
action conditions at the end of the synthetic sequence.
Towards this end, we had to reinvestigate the whole syn-
thetic sequence.
O
O
O
O
iv
iii
H
H
O
OH
O
O
H
H
OH
11
10
HO
HO
O
Ptychantins A (3) and B (4) were reduced with lithium
aluminum hydride to give tetraol 9 in high yield. Sterical-
ly less demanding two hydroxyl groups at C-1 and C-11
of tetraol 9 were protected with 2,2-dimethoxypropane re-
gioselectively as an acetonide to afford acetonide 9
(Scheme 2). Treatment of acetonide 10 with triphosgene
provided carbonate 11 in quantitative yield, while protec-
tion with carbonyldiimidazole gave no satisfactory re-
sults. Deprotection of acetonide 11 proceeded smoothly to
afford diol 12, which was oxidized by chromium pyridine
complex generated in situ (Sarret reagent) to give dike-
tone 13, although oxidation with other chromium reagents
or Swern oxidation was unsatisfactory. In previous syn-
thetic transformations,8 reduction of the carbonyl group at
C-1 was achieved with sodium in tert-butyl alcohol, giv-
ing thermodynamically more stable a-alcohol. Since the
protecting group at C-6 and C-7 is a carbonate, reduction
under nonbasic reaction condition was required to prevent
hydrolysis of the carbonate protecting group. In actuality,
reduction with sodium borohydride in pyridine according
to the known procedure11 provided 1a-alcohol 14 in only
8% yield along with a large amount of recovered starting
material 13 and its deprotected product. Among various
reducing agents tested, reduction was carried out with so-
dium cyanoborohydride in acetic acid and methanol to
give stereoselectively the desired 1a-alcohol 14 accompa-
nied by diol 15, which was oxidized by Sarett reagent
back to diketone 13 in 86% yield. The carbonate protect-
ing group was intact under these reaction conditions. Re-
gioselectivity might be ascribed to steric interaction by
three axial methyl groups at C-8, C-10, and C-13, which
prevented approach of the reducing agent at C-11. Higher
stereoselectivity might be explained by attack of hydride
from the less-hindered b-face of the carbonyl group at C-
1 avoiding steric interference by three 1,3-a-diaxial C–H
O
O
O
v
vi
H
H
O
O
O
O
H
H
O
O
12
O
13
HO
HO
HO
O
O
vii
H
H
O
+
O
O
O
O
H
H
O
14
15
MeO
HO
MeO
HO
O
O
viii
ix
OH
O
O
O
O
O
H
H
O
16
17
O
O
HO
HO
O
O
x
xi
1
OH
OH
O
OH
O
O
H
H
OH
18
19
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, LiAlH4, Et2O, r.t., 6 h, 97%;
ii, 2,2-dimethoxypropane, PPTS, r.t., 17 h, 85%; iii, triphosgene, pyr-
idine, CH2Cl2, r.t., 18 h, quant.; iv, 10% HClO4, THF, r.t., 67 h, 86%;
v, CrO3, pyridine, CH2Cl2, r.t., 54 h, 81%; vi, NaBH3CN, MeOH,
AcOH, r.t., 31 h, 63%, diol 15, 30%; vii, KH, Me2SO4, THF, 0 °C, 2
h, 82%; viii, MCPBA, Cs2CO3, DCE, r.t., 13 h, 85%; ix, 10% CSA,
dioxane–H2O, r.t., 14 d, 78%; x, 10% K2CO3 aq, MeOH, r.t., 1.5 h,
bonds at C-3, C-5, and C-9. In the absence of acetic acid, 86%; xi, Ac2O, pyridine, 0 °C, 18 h, r.t., quant.
only epimerization at C-9 occurred. Treatment of keto al-
cohol 14 with potassium hydride and dimethyl sulfate pro-
tively by MCPBA epoxidation of the D9,11-enol ether 16
ceeded in a thermodynamically controlled manner to
afford D9,11-enol ether 16.10 According to MOPAC AM-1
calculations, D9,11-enol ether 16 is 4 kcal/mol more stable
than the corresponding D11,12-enol ether. Introduction of
the C-9 hydroxyl group was accomplished stereoselec-
probably via interaction with the a-hydroxyl group at C-1
followed by concomitant in situ epoxide opening to give
hydroxyl enol ether 17. Among other organic and inor-
ganic bases tested, cesium carbonate gave the best result.
Hydrolysis of enol ether 17 was carried out in the presence
Synlett 2008, No. 6, 929–931 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York