CCDC reference numbers 222276 and 222277. See http://
www.rsc.org/suppdata/ob/b3/b311415e/ for crystallographic data in
CIF or other electronic format.
The silver-mediated coupling of the allenic bromides with
silyl dienol ether 10 proceeded in acceptable yields (unopti-
mized) in view of the sensitivity of the allenic starting materials
(Scheme 6). The photocycloadditions cleanly gave single regio-
isomers at a somewhat higher rate than for allene 11. The ease
of the cycloaddition leading to three quaternary centers in a
highly compact setting is noteworthy.
1 J. G. Mulder, P. Diepenhorst, P. Plieger and I. E. M. Brüggemann-
Rotgans, PCT Int. Appl. WO 93/02,083 (Chem. Abstr., 1993, 118,
185844z).
2 H. Schenk, R. A. J. Driessen, R. de Gelder, K. Goubitz, H. Nieboer,
I. E. M. Brüggemann-Rotgans and P. Diepenhorst, Croat. Chem.
Acta, 1999, 72, 593–606.
3 A. Fukuzawa, A. Furusaki, M. Ikura and T. Masamune, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1985, 222–224; Correction: A. Fukuzawa,
A. Furusaki, M. Ikura and T. Masamune, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1985, 748.
4 (a) J. C. J. Benningshof, R. H. Blaauw, A. E. van Ginkel, J. H. van
Maarseveen, F. P. J. T. Rutjes and H. Hiemstra, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 2002, 1693–1700; (b) J. C. J. Benningshof, M. IJsselstijn,
S. R. Wallner, A. L. Koster, R. H. Blaauw, A. E. van Ginkel,
J.-F. Brière, J. H. van Maarseveen, F. P. J. T. Rutjes and H. Hiemstra,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2002, 1701–1713.
5 The most direct approach to the bicyclo[2.1.1]hexanone would be an
intramolecular ketene olefin cycloaddition, but this process was
expected to be unproductive on the basis of literature precedent:
B. B. Snider and R. A. H. F. Hui, J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 5167–
5176.
6 (a) R. H. Blaauw, J.-F. Brière, R. de Jong, J. C. J. Benningshof, A. E.
van Ginkel, F. P. J. T. Rutjes, J. Fraanje, K. Goubitz, H. Schenk and
H. Hiemstra, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 233–242; (b) J.-F. Brière, R. H.
Blaauw, J. C. J. Benningshof, A. E. van Ginkel, J. H. van Maarseveen
and H. Hiemstra, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2001, 2371–2377; (c) R. H.
Blaauw, J. C. J. Benningshof, A. E. van Ginkel, J. H. van Maarseveen
and H. Hiemstra, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2001, 2250–2256.
7 D. M. Bailey and R. E. Johnson, J. Org. Chem., 1970, 35, 3574–3576.
8 D. Butina and F. Sondheimer, Synthesis, 1980, 543–545.
9 (a) S. F. Martin, K. J. Barr, D. W. Smith and S. K. Bur, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1999, 121, 6990–6997; (b) J. Boukouvalas and N. Lachance,
Synlett., 1998, 31–32.
Scheme 6 Photocycloaddition with substituted allenes.
In conclusion, the most intricate tricyclic substructure of
solanoeclepin A containing the bicyclo[2.1.1]cyclohexanone
moiety with the correct substitution pattern was prepared by
using the [2 ϩ 2]-photocycloaddition reaction between an
allene and a butenolide as the key step. This major break-
through paves the way towards the total synthesis of the natural
hatching agent which is under active investigation in our
laboratories.
10 J. Pornet, B. Randrianoelina and L. Miginiac, J. Organomet. Chem.,
1979, 174, 1–13.
11 (a) C. W. Jefford, A. W. Sledeski and J. Boukouvalas, Helv. Chim.
Acta, 1989, 72, 1362–1370; (b) C. W. Jefford, A. W. Sledeski, J.-C.
Rossier and J. Boukouvalas, Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31, 5741–5744.
12 See e.g. M. T. Crimmins and T. L. Reinhold, Org. React., 1993, 44,
297–588.
Acknowledgements
We thank the NUFFIC for its financial support to B. T. B. H.
through a development cooperation project between the
Universities of Amsterdam and Can Tho (Vietnam). The stay
of K. L. L. in Amsterdam was financially supported by a
Mundy Fellowship and the Dishman Endowment. We acknow-
ledge the Netherlands Science Foundation (NWO) for a
Visitor’s Grant to F. S. G. We also thank Professor Paul Wender
(Stanford University) for a useful discussion.
13 R. M. Coates, P. D. Senter and W. R. Baker, J. Org. Chem., 1982, 47,
3597–3607.
14 (a) For a review on the photochemistry of butenolides, see A. I.
Hashem, A. Senning and A.-S. Hamad, Org. Prep. Proc. Int., 1998,
30, 403–425; (b) For intramolecular δ-lactone photocycloadditions
of enantiopure allenes, see M. S. Shepard and E. M. Carreira, Tetra-
hedron, 1997, 53, 16253–16276.
15 S. Krishnamurthy and H. C. Brown, J. Org. Chem., 1976, 41, 3064–
3066.
16 T. Honda, H. Takada, S. Miki and M. Tsubuki, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1993, 34, 8275–8278.
17 The reported instability of the natural product in basic medium may
be associated with the β-hydroxyketone moiety.
18 (a) P. H. Lee, K. Bang, H. Ahn and K. Lee, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.,
2001, 22, 1385–1389; (b) B. M. Trost and H. Urabe, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1990, 112, 4982–4983.
19 (a) Y. Ishino, I. Nishiguchi, M. Kim and T. Hirahima, Synthesis,
1982, 740–742; (b) A. Srikrishna, S. Nagaraju and P. Kondaiah,
Tetrahedron, 1995, 51, 1809–1816.
Notes and references
§ Crystal data for 12: C12H14O2, M = 190.24, triclinic, a = 6.6969(4),
b = 7.0489(6), c = 10.9328(7) Å, α = 77.964(6), β = 75.679(9),
3
¯
γ = 80.977(8)Њ, V = 486.04(6) Å , T = 250 K, space group P1, Z = 2,
µ(Cu-Kα) = 0.70 mmϪ1, 1806 observed unique reflections.
For 17: C11H16O2,
M = 180.24, monoclinic, a = 7.0166(3),
b = 10.5703(6), c = 13.7222(13) Å, β = 102.880(5)Њ, V = 992.13(12) Å3,
T = 295 K, space group P21/n, Z = 4, µ (Cu-Kα) = 0.65 mmϪ1, 1743
observed unique reflections.
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 3 , 1, 4 3 6 4 – 4 3 6 6
4366