C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Hydrogenation Activities and Selectivities of the
Catalysts
reaction. Generally, during the recycling and storage of the catalysts
consisting of the supported Pd(0) nanoparticles, an increase in the
size of the nanoparticles due to agglomeration and oxygenation in
the air always leads to deactivation of the catalyst.23 However, our
Pd(0) nanoparticles stabilized by the organic-inorganic hybrid
composites are stable enough to retain the activity when the catalyst
was reused several times or stored under ambient condition for one
month (Figure S10).
Pd(0)-G1-
PAMAM-
SBA-15
Pd(0)-G2-
PAMAM-
SBA-15
Pd(0)-G3-
PAMAM-
SBA-15
Pd(0)-G4-
PAMAM-
SBA-15
TOFa
2185/2150b
79.0/77.7
>99.5%
2266/2288
82.0/82.8
>99.5%
711/705
93.4/92.6
>99.5%
739/734
91.4/90.8
>99.5%
selectivityc(%)
conversion(%)
In summary, we have prepared heterogeneous Pd(0) nanoparticle
catalysts stabilized by Gn-PAMAM-SBA-15 organic-inorganic
hybrid composites. The catalysts show highly catalytic activity for
the hydrogenation of allyl alcohol. Importantly, the hydrogenation
rate and selectivity can be controlled by using different generation
catalysts. Additionally, the catalysts are stable enough to be recycled
multiple times and preserved for one month under ambient
condition, while maintaining the catalytic activities.
a The turnover frequencies (TOFs) were measured as moles hydrogenated
allyl alcohol per molar Pd per hour. b Duplicate measurements were
performed to illustrate the levels of run-to-run reproducibility. c The
selectivities to the hydrogenated products of 1-propanol.
PAMAM-SBA-15 hosts. High-resolution transmission microscopy
(HRTEM) image (Figure 1b) clearly shows that the Pd(0) particles
are quite monodisperse in the channels of SBA-15. The elemental
compositions of the nanoparticles were confirmed by the energy-
dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and ICP analyses (Table S1).
To evaluate the catalytic characteristics of the materials, we
investigated the hydrogenation reactions of allyl alcohol over the
different generation catalysts (Figures S6, S7, and S8) under similar
conditions, which were adopted in the homogeneous hydrogenation
over the dendrimer-encapsulated Pd(0) nanoparticles.10 The turnover
frequencies (TOFs), selectivities to the 1-propanol, and conversions
for the hydrogenation of allyl alcohol are summarized in Table 1,
which suggest that all of the catalysts show highly catalytic activity
for the hydrogenation of allyl alcohol. Notably, the activity of our
Pd(0)-G4-PAMAM-SBA-15 catalyst is 1.5 times that of the fourth
generation dendrimer-encapsulated Pd(0) homogeneous catalyst.10
Probably, the existence of the inorganic carrier may reduce the
aggregation of the dendrimer-encapsulated Pd(0) nanoparticles
relative to the homogeneous dendrimer-encapsulated Pd(0) catalysts.
Generally, substrate isomerization is a common but unwanted
process in hydrogenation.20 It is desirable to minimize the isomer-
ization during the hydrogenation reaction. In our system, the
selectivity to hydrogenation product (1-propanol) was improved
when increasing the product generation. Under the same conditions,
the selectivities were 79.0, 82.0% and 93.4, 91.4%, when using
generations 1, 2 and 3, 4 catalysts, respectively. Selectivity of the
isomerization byproduct of acetone over the generation 3 catalyst
was 6.6%, which is much lower than that over the reported
heterogeneous catalyst Pd/Al2O3 (25%).20 These results indicate that
the dendrimers may not only stabilize the nanoparticles but also
modify both the environment of active sites and access to these
sites.21
Acknowledgment. This work was financially supported by the
Chinese National Science Foundation (NO. 20201013) and the
Creative Foundation (No. SCX200404) of Chinese Academy of
Sciences.
Supporting Information Available: Procedure for preparing
Pd(0)-Gn-PAMAM-SBA-15 catalysts, hydrogenation reactions, data of
catalyses, HRTEM of the G3-PAMAM-SBA-15 and Pd(0)-G3-PAMAM-
SBA-15, N2 adsorption data of the Gn-PAMAM-SBA-15, results of
the ICP-AES, TGA, EA quantitative analyses, 13C CPMAS NMR, and
FT-IR spectra of the materials (PDF). This material is available free
References
(1) Nishihata, Y.; Mizuki, J.; Akao, T.; Tanaka, H.; Uenishi, M.; Kimura,
M.; Okamoto, T.; Hamada, N. Nature 2002, 418, 164-167.
(2) Mandal, S.; Roy, D.; Chaudhari, R. V.; Sastry, M. Chem. Mater. 2004,
16, 3714-3724.
(3) Abd Hamid, S. B.; Schogl, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1628-
1637.
(4) Iwasawa, T.; Tokunaga, M.; Obora, Y.; Tsuji, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 6554-6555.
(5) Li, Y.; Boone, E.; El-Sayed, M. A. Langmuir 2002, 18, 4921-4925.
(6) Chen, H. R.; Shi, J. L.; Li, Y. S.; Yan, J. N.; Hua, Z. L.; Chen, H. G.;
Yan, D. S. AdV. Mater. 2003, 15, 1078-1081.
(7) Bronstein, B. L. M.; Ploarz, S.; Smarsly, B.; Antonietti, M. AdV. Mater.
2001, 13, 1333-1336.
(8) Zhu, H.; Lee, B.; Dai, S.; Overbury, S. H. Langmuir 2003, 19, 3974-
3980.
(9) Okamoto, K.; Akiyama, R.; Yoshida, H.; Yoshida, T.; Kobayashi, S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2125-2135.
(10) Niu, Y.; Yeung L. K.; Crooks, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6840-
6846.
(11) Oh, S. K.; Kim, Y. G.; Ye, H.; Crooks, R. M. Langmuir 2003, 19, 10420-
10425.
Interestingly, the hydrogenation reaction rates may be controlled
by varying the generations. For example, the TOFs of the
generations 1 and 2 catalysts were almost 3-fold compared with
those of generations 3 and 4. To understand the determining factors
that control the reaction rates, we studied the dependencies of
reaction rates (r0) on initial concentrations (C0) of allyl alcohol with
the generations 2 and 3 catalysts. As to the reaction over the
generation 2 catalyst, the hydrogenation is zero order with respect
to the initial concentration of the substrate. However, the one over
the generation 3 catalyst agreed very well with Langmuir-
Hinshelwood model (r0 ) kKC0/(1 + KC0), Figure S9).22 At a low
concentration, the first-order kinetics indicates that the rate-limiting
step is the diffusion of the substrate to the active site or slow
adsorption. At a high concentration, saturation of the catalyst surface
occurred, and zero order was observed.
(12) Scott, R. W. J.; Wilson, O. M.; Oh, S. K.; Kenik, E. A.; Crooks, R. M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15583-15591.
(13) Lu, S. M.; Alper, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13126-13131.
(14) Nozaki, K.; Itoi, Y.; Shibahara, F.; Shirakawa, E.; Ohta, T.; Takaya, H.;
Hiyama, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4051-4052.
(15) Shuttleworth, S. J.; Allin, M.; Sharma, P. K. Synthesis 1997, 1217-1239.
(16) Reynhardt, J. P. K.; Yang, Y.; Sayari, A. Alper, H. Chem. Mater. 2004,
16, 4095-4102.
(17) Erick, E. J.; Carr, C. S.; Simanek, E. E.; Shantz, D. F. AdV. Mater. 2004,
16, 985-989.
(18) Zhao, D.; Huo, Q.; Feng, J.; Chmelka, B. F.; Stucky, G. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 6024-6036.
(19) Kim, S. W.; Park, J.; Jang, Y.; Chung, Y.; Hwang, S.; Hyeon, T. Nano
Lett. 2003, 3, 1289-1291.
(20) Zharmagambetova, A. K.; Ergozhin, E. E.; Sheludyakov, Y. L.; Mukhamed-
zhanova, S. G.; Kurmanbayeva, I. A.; Selenova, B. A.; Utkelov, B. A. J.
Mol. Catal. A 2001, 177, 165-170.
(21) Kidambi, S.; Bruening, M. L. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 301-307.
(22) Crezee, E.; Hoffer, B. W.; Berger, R. J.; Makkee, M.; Kapteijn, F.; Moulijn,
J. A. Appl. Catal. A 2003, 251, 1-17.
(23) Narayanan, R.; El-Sayed, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 8572-8580.
Finally, the reaction stopped when the catalyst was removed by
filtration, suggesting that the hydrogenation is a heterogeneous
JA056424G
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 3, 2006 717