2222
J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2222-2229
Mech a n istic Stu d y of th e J a cobsen Asym m etr ic Ep oxid a tion of
In d en e
David L. Hughes,* George B. Smith,* J i Liu, George C. Dezeny, Chris H. Senanayake,
Robert D. Larsen, Thomas R. Verhoeven, and Paul J . Reider
Process Research, Merck Research Laboratories, P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, New J ersey 07065
Received September 10, 1996X
The asymmetric epoxidation of indene using aqueous NaOCl, catalyzed by J acobsen’s chiral
manganese salen complex, provides indene oxide in 90% yield and 85-88% enantioselectivity. The
axial ligand, 4-(3-phenylpropyl)pyridine N-oxide (P3NO), increases the rate of epoxidation without
affecting enantioselectivity and also stabilizes the catalyst. These two effects afford a reduction in
catalyst loading to <1%. The turnover-limiting step in the catalytic cycle has been determined to
be the oxidation of the manganese catalyst, based on reaction orders of 0 in indene and 1 in catalyst
and also based on the dependence of the rate on the hypochlorite concentration. In the presence
of the ligand P3NO, this rate-limiting oxidation occurs in the organic phase with HOCl as oxidant,
as shown by the dependence of the rate on the NaOH concentration. P3NO assists the transport
of HOCl to the organic layer as demonstrated by titration studies and by measuring the rates of
oxidation of a redox indicator, diphenylbenzidine. On the other hand, stirring speed studies indicate
that, in the absence of the ligand, oxidation occurs at the interface. Thus, the axial ligand plays
at least two roles in the epoxidation of indene: it stabilizes the catalyst, presumably by ligation,
and it increases the epoxidation reaction rate by drawing the active oxidant, HOCl, into the organic
layer.
In tr od u ction
The mechanism of the transition metal-catalyzed ep-
oxidation has been the subject of speculation for the last
decade. Recent controversy has centered on whether the
reaction takes place as a direct transfer of the oxygen
from the metal to the substrate or whether an intermedi-
ate oxametallocycle is formed. The hypothesis for the
oxametallocycle was first advanced by Collman and co-
workers and was based on kinetic measurements.9a,b The
reactions were independent of olefin concentration, yet
different olefins exhibited variable epoxidation rates. This
suggested that the olefin and catalyst reversibly formed
an intermediate that broke down in the rate-determining
step, and as expected from this reasoning, the reactions
followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics.9a,b However, the
conclusions from this paper were later withdrawn as
results from further experimental work demonstrated
poor mass balance and instability of the oxidant under
the conditions used for the kinetic experiments.9b,c On
the other hand, Norrby and colleagues recently argued
that the oxetane was a viable intermediate based on
theoretical considerations,10 and Katsuki observed non-
linearity in Eyring plots for the epoxidation of alkenes
using modified chiral manganese salen catalysts,11 which
is consistent with an intermediate on the reaction
pathway. However, these results were questioned by
J acobsen,12 who noted that the variation in ee is less than
10%, making interpretation difficult. On the other hand,
J acobsen has demonstrated a linear temperature/ee
The versatility of asymmetric epoxides as intermedi-
ates in organic synthesis has sparked considerable effort
in their synthesis over the past 2 decades. In the 1970s
Sharpless1 and others2 discovered that achiral epoxides
could be generated from alkenes using metal catalysts
and alkyl peroxides. As an extension of this work, the
first significant breakthrough in realizing asymmetric
epoxidations came in 1980 when Sharpless and Katsuki
reported that the reaction of allylic alcohols with t-
BuOOH, Ti(O-i-Pr)4, and (+)- or (-)-diethyl tartrate
provided high yields of epoxides with enantioselectivities
up to 90%.3 Soon after, Groves discovered that chiral
transition metal porphyrin complexes were able to ep-
oxidize styrenes with enantioselectivities up to 51%.4
Building on the work of Kochi5 and Burrows6 in the
1980s, who used achiral manganese salen catalysts for
epoxidations, J acobsen reported in 1990 that unfunction-
alized alkenes could be epoxidized with high enantio-
selectivities using chiral manganese salen catalysts.7
High ee’s, straightforward catalyst preparation, use of
simple oxidants such as aqueous hypochlorite, and suc-
cess of the method with a wide variety of olefins have
made the preparation of chiral epoxides practical and
efficient using the J acobsen protocol.8
X Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, March 15, 1997.
(1) Sharpless, K. B.; Michaelson, R. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95,
6136.
(2) (a) Hart, H.; Lavrik, P. B. J . Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 1793. (b)
Sheldon, R. A. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1973, 92, 253.
(3) Katsuki, T.; Sharpless, K. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5974.
(4) Groves, J . T.; Meyers, R. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 5791.
(5) Srinivasan, K.; Michaud, P.; Kochi, J . K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 2309-2320. Srinivasan, K.; Perrier, S.; Kochi, J . K. J . Mol. Catal.
1986, 36, 297-317.
(9) (a) Collman, J . P.; Brauman, J . I.; Meunier, B.; Raybuck, S. A.;
Kodadek, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1984, 81, 3245-3248. (b)
Collman, J . P.; Brauman, J . I.; Meunier, B.; Hayashi, T.; Kodadek, T.;
Raybuck, S. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 2000-2005. (c) Collman,
J . P.; Brauman, J . I.; Hampton, P. D.; Tanaka, H.; Bohle, D. S.;
Hembre, R. T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7980-7984.
(10) Norrby, P.-O.; Linde, C.; Akermark, B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 11035-11036.
(6) Yoon, H.; Burrows, C. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4087.
(7) Zhang, W.; Loebach, J . L.; Wilson, S. R.; J acobsen, E. N. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2801.
(11) Hamada, T.; Fukuda, T.; Imanishi, H.; Katsuki, T. Tetrahedron
1996, 52, 515-530.
(8) J acobsen, E. N. In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis; Ojima, I.,
Ed.; VCH Publishers: New York, 1993; pp 159-202.
(12) Finney, N. S.; Pospisil, P. J .; Chang, S.; Palucki, M.; Hansen,
K. B.; J acobsen, E. N. Private communication.
S0022-3263(96)01735-5 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society