174
W. Fan et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 506 (2015) 173–179
ILs complexes functionalized by chiral salen Mn(III) were efficient
Further, taking into account that the combination of IL cations
with metal-containing inorganic anions can cause the formation
of ionic hybrids with high melting point and insolubility that are
emerging to be very important in catalysis [38,39]. Accordingly, we
think that it is rational to prepare a composite catalyst by pairing
metal Schiff base functionalized IL cations with metal-containing
inorganic anions. The resulting composite may be a novel hetero-
geneous catalyst for epoxidation of alkenes with H2O2.
2.2.2. Synthesis of [MoO2(acac)2]
Molybdenyl acetylacetonate [MoO2(acac)2] was prepared
according to previous literature [40] with about 51% yield.
2.2.3. Synthesis of Mo–MimAM
Mo–MimAM was prepared according to previous literature [41].
In detail, MimAM (1.21 g, 6 mmol) dissolved in anhydrous ethanol
(10 mL) was added dropwise into the ethanol (10 mL) solution of
[MoO2(acac)2] (0.98 g, 3 mmol) with vigorous stirring, the result-
ing mixture was refluxed at room temperature for 24 h under a
nitrogen atmosphere. The formed light-blue solid precipitate was
filtered off and washed thoroughly by H2O and ethanol, and dried
under vacuum. CHN elemental analysis for Mo–MimAM (by the
mass percentage): C 43.87%; N 13.95%; H 5.02%. Found: C 44.11 %;
N 13.37 %; H 5.94 %.
Herein, we demonstrate a novel metal Schiff base-tungstate
ionic hybrid whereby molybdenum (Mo) Schiff base and tungstate
(WO42−) were attached to IL cation and anion, respectively. It was
fully characterized by 1H NMR, FT-IR, XRD, SEM, TGA, and XPS, and
used as a highly efficient heterogeneous catalyst in the epoxidation
of alkenes with H2O2, showing a better catalytic activity than the
2−
2.2.4. Synthesis of Mo–MimAM–WO4
Schiff base metal complex or WO4 along.
The obtained Mo-MimAM (1.5 g, 2 mmol) was dissolved in 30 mL
ethanol in a 100 mL round bottom flask. Then, an aqueous solu-
tion of Na2WO4·2H2O (1.0 g, 3 mmol) was added to the solution
of Mo–MimAM, followed by the stirring of the mixture for 24 h
at 80 ◦C. The white precipitate Mo–MimAM–WO4 was filtered and
washed thoroughly with H2O and ethanol, and dried under vac-
uum. CHN elemental analysis for Mo–MimAM–WO4 (by the mass
percentage): C 26.93%; N 7.85%; H 3.95%. Found: C 26.65 %; N 7.8
%; H 4.04 %.
2. Experimental
2.1. Reagents and analysis
All chemicals were analytical grade (purity > 99%) and used as
received. FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 360 FT-IR instru-
ment (KBr discs) in the 4,000–400 cm−1 region. 1H NMR spectra
were measured with a Bruker DPX 400 spectrometer at ambient
temperature in D2O using TMS as internal reference. TG analysis
was carried out with a STA409 instrument in dry air at a heating
rate of 10 ◦C/min. SEM image was performed on a HITACHI S-4800
field-emission scanning electron microscope. XRD patterns were
collected on the Bruker D8 Advance powder diffractometer using
Ni-filtered Cu/K␣ radiation source at 40 kV and 20 mA, from 5–80◦
with a scan rate of 4◦/min. The metal species were detected by
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo ESCALAB 250 Xi).
The spectra were recorded with Al K␣ line as the excitation source
(hꢀ = 1486.6 eV). The binding energy (B.E.) values were referenced
to the C 1s peak of contaminant carbon at 284.8 eV. The amount
of leached Mo species in the filtrate was measured using a Jarrell-
Ash 1100 ICP-AES spectrometer. The CHN elemental analysis was
performed on an elemental analyzer Vario EL cube.
2.3. Catalytic tests
Cyclooctene
(1 mmol),
CH3CN
(5 mL),
and
catalyst
Mo–MimAM–WO4 (10 mg) were added into
a
25 mL round
bottom flask. The reaction system was heated to 60 ◦C with
vigorous stirring, then, and the aqueous H2O2 (30 wt.%, 2.5 mmol)
was added dropwise into the reaction mixture within 10 min.
After that, the reaction was stirred for another 4 h at 60 ◦C. After
the reaction, the catalyst was filtered off, washed with ethanol
and dried at 80 ◦C for another run. The product mixture was
analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) (SP-6890A) equipped with
a FID detector and a capillary column (SE-54 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.3
m). Calibration area normalization method was used to quantify
the products, and each reaction mixture sample was detected
five times to take the average. Notably, the deviation of the five
measurements is less than 2%.
2.2. Preparation of catalysts
3.1. Catalyst preparation and characterization
2.2.1. Synthesis of [3-aminoethyl-1-methylimidazolium]Br
(MimAM)
The synthetic route for Mo–MimAM–WO4 is shown in
Scheme 1. The organic-molybdenum ionic complex abbreviated as
MimAM
detail, N-methylimidazole
was
prepared
(8.2 g,
as
following:
0.1 mol) and
In
2-
Mo–MimAM was prepared by covalent binding amino function-
2−
bromoethylaminehydrobromide (20.5 g, 0.1 mol) were dissolved in
50 mL absolute ethanol at 80 ◦C for 48 h under nitrogen atmosphere
with reflux and stirring. On completion, solvent was removed by
distillation, and the residue was washed with ethyl acetate for 3
times to afford the IL precursor MimAM·HBr. KOH was added into
the aqueous solution of the above solid for neutralization, followed
by the evaporation under vacuum. Methanol (20 mL) and CHCl3
(2 mL) were added into the resulting mixture with the appearance
of precipitated salts. After filtration, the filtrate was evaporated to
give the MimAM product as yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O,
TMS) ı(ppm) = 3.47 (m, 2H, CH2), 4.58 (m, 2H, CH2), 5.40 (dd,
1H, CH), 5.81 (dd, 1H, CH), 7.13 (m, 1H, CH), 7.66 (s, 1H, CH),
7.81 (s, 1H, CH), 9.18 (s, 1H, CH). CHN elemental analysis for
MimAM (by the mass percentage): C 34.97%; N 20.39%; H 5.87%.
Found: C 34.58%; N 20.25%; H 5.96%.
alized IL and MoO2(acac)2. Then, WO4
species was introduced
by anion-exchange of Mo–MimAM with Na2WO4 to give the
CHN elemental analysis for Mo–MimAM–WO4 showed 26.65%
for the weight percentage of C, 7.8% for N, and 4.04% for H,
which is very near to the theoretical values of C: 26.93%, N:
7.85%, and H: 3.95%. Moreover, the TG profile (Fig. 1) indicates
that Mo-MimAM-WO4 was quite stable up to 290 ◦C, the total
weight loss of about 45% was somewhat corresponding to the
decomposition of both organic and inorganic moieties of the cat-
alyst into individual oxides (MoO3 and WO3) (calculated weight
loss: 42%).
Fig. 2 compares the FT-IR spectrum of Mo–MimAM–WO4 with
those of [MoO2(acac)2], Na2WO4, and Mo–MimAM. [MoO2(acac)2]