Salmonella enteridis risk assessment . . .
ter 40 d at 5 °C, only 55% of the YMT fraction was consumed. since its depletion time, for most cases, is more than 90% of the
Therefore, storage at 5 °C could be considered as an over dimen- total safety time. In the same way, the growth phase could be
sioned alternative, in terms of controlled temperature for safety considered as safety factor. In other words, the safety period for
reasons. In all 3 scenarios given by situations 1, 2, and 3, the total shell egg consumption is over, when vitelline membrane deple-
time (addition of membrane breakage time and growth time to tion finishes.
achieve 106 (CFU/g)) was always less than 30 d, therefore indi-
15 °C is the advisable control temperature to ensure consum-
cating high-risk situation occurrences. On the other hand, for sit- er health when eggs are kept less that 30 d in a retail supermar-
uation 4 (15 °C constant temperature) the total time was always ket.
longer then 30 d, regardless of the SE initial concentration used
20 °C is the advisable control temperature to ensure consum-
for simulations, being an indicative result of advisable storage er health when eggs are kept less that 15 d in a retail supermar-
condition. Figure 5 and 6 show the required time to achieve 106 ket. This recommendation might be applied in those market-
(CFU/ g) as affected by initial concentration and ambient tem- places in which rotation times of eggs are less than 15 d or
perature profile for winter and constant temperature (15 °C) sim- generally 10 d.
ulating experiments, respectively.
The developed combined-model can be used to analyze other
When eggs are stored under fluctuating temperature condi- scenarios and offer sound scientific support for future regulation
tions (between 18 °C to 20 °C) - simulating those that might be adjustments or modifications.
found in a kitchen - rapid SE growth is possible after 6 to 10 d in
References
the majority of examined eggs as stated in a research conducted
by Humphrey and Whitehead (1993). Humphrey‘s results are in
agreement with those obtained in this research for situation
number 2 (summer) in which 10 d, the upper limit of the above
mentioned research, was necessary to attain YMT depletion. It is
presumed that insulated packaging, considered in our research,
might have some effect on the results as the experiments carried
out by Humphrey and Whitehead where done without taking
that factor into account.
There has been much debate on the advisability of holding
eggs under refrigeration in retail outlets. The data on storage-re-
lated effects on the growth rate of SE in egg contents (Humphrey
and Whitehead 1993; Humphrey and others 1991b) coupled with
data on naturally contaminated eggs stored at 20 °C, suggests
that refrigerated storage might not be necessary provided that
temperatures do not exceed 20 °C (Humphrey 1994). This recom-
mendation may also be a result from this research study, but
with a new constraint on holding time, which is no more than 17
d, the time for YMT breakdown under situation number 3 (20 °C).
Whiting generated a biological model for YMT depletion and
SE growth estimation, which was used in this research (Whiting
and others 2000). However, the former research used an empiri-
cal heat transfer model to estimate the temperature inside eggs
which is only valid for a cooling procedure at constant ambient
temperature and constant initial temperature. The error of this
empirical model arose from using it for transportation or storage
conditions, that consider fluctuating ambient temperatures.
Their results are not comparable with the ones obtained in this
research, because theirs considered eggs arranged in pallets,
and ours considered packaged eggs which is the way supermar-
kets usually display this product.
Almonacid SF, Simpson R, Nuñez P, Saavedra, O. 2000. Salmonella enteritidis risk
assessment: heat transfer model. 2000. Proceedings of ICEF8, International
Conference of Engineering and Food. 1727-1731.
Almonacid SF, Torres, JA. 1993. Mathematical models to evaluate temperature
abuse effects during distribution of refrigerated solid foods. J of Food Eng 20:223-
245
Aserkoff B, Schroeder SA, Brachman PS. 1970. Salmonellosis in The United States-
a five-year review. Am J Epidemiol 92:13-24
Bradshaw JG, Dhirendra Shah B, Forney E, Madden JM. 1990. Growth of Salmo-
nella enteritidis in yolk of shell eggs from normal and seropositive hens. J
Food Protect 53:12 1033-1036.
Dolman J, Board, RG. 1992. The influence of temperature on the behavior of
mixed bacterial contamination of shell membrane of hen’s eggs. Epidemiol
Infect 108: 115-121
Gast RK, Beard CW. 1990. Production of Salmonella enteritidis-contaminated
eggs by experimentally infected hens. Avian Dis 34, 438-446.
Gutierrez JA. 2000. Evaluación de riesgo de Salmonella enteritidis en huevos
frescos: Modelo matemático. Chemical Engineering Thesis. Universidad Téc-
nica Federico Santa María
Holdsworth SD. 1997. Thermal Processing of Packaged Foods. 1st ed. New York:
Chapman & Hall. p 25-29
Humphrey TJ, Greenwood M, Gilbert RJ, Rowe B, Chapman PA. 1989. The surviv-
al of Salmonella in shell eggs cooked under simulated domestic conditions.
Epidem Inf 103:35-45.
Humphrey TJ, Whitehead A, Gawler AHL, Henley A, Rowe B. 1991b. Number of
Salmonella enteritidis in the contents of naturally contaminated hen eggs.
Epidemiol Infect 106:489-496.
Humphrey TJ, Whitehead A. 1993. Egg age and the growth of Salmonella enterit-
idis in egg contents. Epidemiol Infect 111:209-219.
Humphrey TJ. 1994. Contamination of eggshell and contents with Salmonella
enteritidis: a review. Int J Food Microbiol 21:31-40.
Jay JM. 2000. Modern Food Microbiology, Sixth ed. Gaitherburg, Md.: Aspen Pub-
lications, Inc. p. 519.
Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile, Informes Mensuales 1998
Kim CJ, Emery DA, Rinke H, Nagaraja KV, Halvorson DA. 1989. Effect of time and
temperature on growth of Salmonella enteritidis in experimentally inoculat-
ed eggs. AVIAN Diseases 33:735-742.
Schoeni JL, Glass KA, McDermont JL, Wong ACL. 1995. Growth and penetration
of Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella heidelberg and Salmonella typhimitium
in eggs. Int J Food Microbiol 24:385-396.
U.S. Department of Agriculture 1999. Food Safety and Inspection Service, Wash-
Osorio H. 2001. Consumo de huevos en Chile. Industria de Alimentos 4:40-42.
Whiting RC, Hogue A, Schlosser WD, Ebel ED, Morales RA, Baker A, McDowell
RM. 2000. A quantitative process model for Salmonella enteritidis in shell eggs.
J Food Sci 65:864-869.
Conclusions and Recommendations
ONCEPTUAL MATHEMATICAL MODELS COULD BE USE-
MS 20010240 Submitted 5/14/01, Revised 8/20/01, Revised 11/8/01, Accepted
11/10/01, Received 11/10/01
C
ful tools to estimate important variables or parameters in
This research was partially supported by the Provincial Government of Valparaiso-Chile and
from a research Grant 992725 from the Santa María University.
real practical situations. Rapid progress of both software and
hardware allows it to simulate real situations with fewer assump-
tions.
The authors are with Departamento de Procesos Químicos, Biotecnológicos,
y Ambientales Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María; P.O. Box 110-V;
Valparaíso, Chile. Direct inquiries to author Almonacid (E-mail:
salmonac@pqui.utfsm.cl).
The breakdown of vitelline membrane could be used as safe-
ty criterion for shelf life estimations under different situations
1120 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 67, Nr. 3, 2002