X. Lv et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 307 (2020) 112954
3
was kept at 5.4 μM, and the molar ratios of the mixture ([NAR or HES]/
Based on the Michaelis−Menten kinetics, the Lineweaver-Burk
[hPNP]) were varied as 0:1, 2:1 and 4:1.
equation for mixed type inhibition is as follows [19]:
ꢀ
ꢁ
ꢀ
ꢁ
1
v
Km
Vmax½Sꢁ
1
½Iꢁ
1
Vmax
½Iꢁ
¼
1 þ
þ
1 þ
ð2Þ
2.5. Molecular simulation
Ki
Kis
Molecular docking of the optimized ligands (NAR and HES) with
hPNP (PDB: 3K8O) was performed in AutoDockTools-1.5.6rc3 with
Autodock 4.2 program package using Lamarckian genetic algorithm
(LGA) as the search engine. The default grid spacing of 0.7 Å with a
grid-box 120 Å × 120 Å × 120 Å was applied by AutoGrid program.
For each ligand, 100 possible conformations were generated, and
based on glide score and conformation clusters, the optimal conforma-
tion with the lowest energy was selected for further analysis.
Secondary plots can be built as:
Km½Iꢁ
Km
Vmax
Slop ¼
Ki þ
ð3Þ
ð4Þ
Vmax
1
1
1
Y−intercept ¼
¼
þ
½Iꢁ
app
Vmax KisVmax
V
max
where ν is the enzyme reaction rate in the absence and presence of NAR
or HES. Km is the Michaelis–Menten constant. [I] is the concentration of
NAR or HES, and [S] is the concentration of inosine; Ki and Kis are the
equilibrium constant for binding with free enzyme and the enzyme-
substrate complex, respectively.
2.6. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements
AFM measurements were performed using an MFP-3D-S AFM
(Santa Barbara, CA) in tapping mode as described previously [15].
Briefly, 1.0 mL hPNP (1.30 × 10−7 M) with NAR/HES (molar ratio, 1:0
and 1:5) was incubated for 3.0 h at 25 °C. Then, 15 μL of each sample
was air dried on a freshly cleaved mica plate with standing for 0.5 h,
and followed by washed gently with 300 μL ultrapure water. After suit-
able drying and calibration, the desired AFM images were obtained.
The secondary plot of slope or Y-intercept vs. [NAR] was linear
(Fig. 3C and D inset), suggesting that NAR and HES had a single inhibi-
tion site or a single class of inhibition sites on hPNP [20]. Based on sec-
ondary plots, the values of Ki for NAR and HES were obtained to be
(3.48 0.1) × 10−4 M−1 and (3.94 0.1) × 10−4 M−1, respectively.
Accordingly, the Kis of inhibitors with respect to inosine–hPNP com-
plexes of NAR and HES were determined to be (1.53
0.3) × 10−3 M−1 and (1.27 0.3) × 10−3 M−1. The value of Kis was ob-
viously greater than that of Ki, indicating that the affinity of NAR and
HES to hPNP may be stronger than that of the inosine–hPNP complex
[21]. Similar results were reported by Wen and coworkers, who also ob-
served that flavonoids including chrysin, baicalein and apigenin per-
formed as mixed-type inhibitors of hPNP [2].
2.7. Statistical analysis
Results were expressed as means SD. Data were analyzed using
OriginPro 8.0 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).
3. Results and discussion
3.3. Fluorescence quenching of hPNP by Nar and HES
3.1. The inhibitory effects on hPNP
The inhibitory activity of NAR and HES on hPNP demonstrates that
there is a direct interaction between these two flavonoids and hPNP.
Therefore, fluorescence quenching of hPNP was induced by NAR and
HES to investigate their interactions. As shown in Fig. 4A and B, the max-
imum fluorescence emission peak of hPNP at 338 nm decreased with an
apparent red-shift after gradually adding of NAR and HES (0 to
5.73 × 10−4 M), indicating that the binding of NAR and HES to hPNP in-
deed happened, and their interactions resulted in some perturbations in
the conformation of hPNP [22].
Fig. 2A and B exhibit the effects of NAR and HES in the range of con-
centrations from 0 to 6.88 × 10−4 M on the hypoxanthine formation, re-
spectively. Obviously, the production of hypoxanthine was gradually
decreased with the increasing concentration of NAR and HES, indicating
that both they decreased hypoxanthine formation in a concentration-
dependent manner. These results were well consistent with the loss rel-
ative activity of hPNP (Fig. 2C). The concentration of NAR and HES that
resulted in a loss of 50% enzyme activity (IC50) was estimated to be
4.83 × 10−4 M and 5.32 × 10−4 M, respectively, implying that NAR
and HES might have a potential to inhibit the activity of hPNP.
For fluorescence quenching, an improved method was used to calcu-
late the binding constant (Ka) and the number of binding sites (n) [23].
3.2. Inhibition mechanism of NAR and HES on the activity of hPNP
F0−F
F
1
log
¼ n logKa−n log
½Qtꢁ−
ð5Þ
F0−F
½Ptꢁ
To confirm the reversibility of these two citrus flavonoids inhibition
toward hPNP, the plots of the v vs [hPNP] (enzyme concentration) in the
presence of increasing concentrations of NAR and HES were con-
structed. As shown in Fig. 3A and B, all data were fitted and gave a family
of straight lines with intercepts essentially equal to 0. Moreover, in-
creasing concentrations of NAR and HES led to a decrease in the slopes
of the lines, suggesting that these two flavonoids reversibly inhibited
hPNP activity, that led to the decrease of efficiency in term of the pro-
duction of hypoxanthine [16].
The kinetic behavior of hPNP during phosphorolysis of inosine in the
presence of NAR and HES was evaluated using double-reciprocal
Lineweaver-Burk plots at different concentrations of inosine and NAR/
HES. As can be seen in Fig. 3C and D, the Lineweaver-Burk plots gave a
family of lines with different slopes and different Y-axis intercepts indi-
cating that NAR and HES are typically mixed-type hPNP inhibitors
[17,18]. This means that NAR and HES not only bind with the free
hPNP but also with the inosine–hPNP complex resulting in an increase
F
where [Pt] and [Qt] denote the total concentrations of the hPNP and
NAR/HES, respectively. F0 and F are the corrected fluorescence intensi-
ties of hPNP in the absence and presence of NAR/HES, respectively,
based on a reported method [24]. Based on the Eq. (5) and Fig. 4C, the
calculated Ka and n values for NAR−hPNP and HES−hPNP were
(4.73 0.03) × 104 M−1 and (3.94 0.04) × 104 M−1, and 1.25 and
1.36, indicating a strong static interaction of these two flavonoids with
hPNP [25]. The estimated Ka values for NAR−hPNP was larger than
HES−hPNP, suggesting that the stability of NAR–hPNP N HES–hPNP,
which is well consistent with the Ki values from inhibition kinetic
results.
3.4. Three-dimensional fluorescence analysis
To study the possible hPNP conformational change, 3-D fluorescence
spectra of hPNP and the NAR/HES−hPNP complex were measured,
of Km and a decrease of Vmax
.