Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.3 (2004)
277
device 4 in the range of the applied voltage, indicating that the
electron-transporting ability of 1a is inferior to that of BCP.
The current density of the EL device is slightly improved in de-
vices 2 and 3. All of the devices began to emit at an applied volt-
age of 3 V. The emission spectra from devices 1–3 were coinci-
dent with that from device 4, implying phosphorescence from
the Ir(ppy)3 emitters in the devices. Devices 1–4 had the Com-
mission Internationale de L’Eclairage (CIE) coordinates of
(0.28, 0.64), (0.29, 0.51), (0.27, 0.61), and (0.24, 0.66), respec-
tively.
to 18% in device 3 and this value is close to the theoretical limit
about 20% from simple classical optics.18 In addition, the max-
imum power luminous efficiency of device 3 was over
45 Lm Wꢁ1 although the device was driven at the relatively high
voltage.
In summary, we designed and prepared 9,90-diaryl-4,5-di-
azafluorenes 1 as electron-transporting and hole-blocking mate-
rials. The EL devices using 1a indicated the high performance of
hole-blocking ability in comparison to BCP. Improvement of the
electron-transporting ability is expected to provide higher per-
formance of phosphorescent EL devices. EL devices with com-
pounds 1b, c are currently under study.
a)
ITO/TPD (500 Å)/4.8%-Ir(ppy)3:CBP (200 Å)/ETL (300
This work was supported by a grant from Innovation Plaza
Tokai ‘‘Investigation of organic device integration using self-
alignment technology.’’ M. O. thanks the Shorai Foundation
for Science and Technology for financial support. We thank
M. Uchida at Chisso Corp. for providing the PyPySPyPy sample.
Å)/LiF (10 Å)/Al (700 Å).
device 1 ( ) : ETL = 1a (300 Å)
device 2 ( ) : ETL = 1a (100 Å) + Alq3 (200 Å)
device 3 ( ) : ETL = 1a (100 Å) + PyPySPyPy (200 Å)
device 4 ( ) : ETL = BCP (300 Å)
×
References
1
104
b)
C. W. Tang and S. A. VanSlyke, Appl. Phys. Lett., 51, 913
(1987); C. Adachi, S. Tokito, T. Tsutsui, and S. Saito, Jpn.
J. Appl. Phys., 27, L713 (1988).
H. Nakada, Eur. Patent 564224 (1993); Chem. Abstr., 120,
204088r (1994).
Y. Hamada, C. Adachi, T. Tsutsui, and S. Saito, Jpn. J. Appl.
Phys., 31, 1812 (1992).
J. Kido, C. Ohtaki, K. Hongawa, K. Okuyama, and K. Nagai,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 32, L917 (1993).
K. Tamao, M. Uchida, T. Izumizawa, K. Furukawa, and S.
Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 11974 (1996).
S. B. Heidenhain, Y. Sakamoto, T. Suzuki, A. Miura, H.
Fujikawa, T. Mori, S. Tokito, and Y. Taga, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 122, 10240 (2000).
103
102
101
100
10-1
10-2
10-3
2
3
4
5
6
0
2
4
6
8
10 12 14
Applied voltage (V) / V
c)
80
60
40
20
0
7
8
9
T. Noda and Y. Shirota, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 9714
(1998).
M. A. Baldo, S. Lamansky, P. E. Burrows, M. E. Thompson,
and S. R. Forrest, Appl. Phys. Lett., 75, 4 (1999).
T. Tsutsui, M.-J. Yang, M. Yahiro, K. Nakamura, T.
Watanabe, T. Tsuji, Y. Fukuda, T. Wakimoto, and S. Miya-
guchi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 38, L1502 (1999).
η
10 C. Adachi, M. A. Baldo, S. R. Forrest, and M. E. Thompson,
Appl. Phys. Lett., 77, 904 (2000).
11 M. Ikai, S. Tokito, Y. Sakamoto, T. Suzuki, and Y. Taga,
Appl. Phys. Lett., 79, 156 (2001).
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
−2
1000
12 S. Lamansky, P. Djurovich, D. Murphy, F. Abdel-Razzaq,
H.-E. Lee, C. Adachi, P. E. Burrows, S. R. Forrest, and M.
E. Thompson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 4304 (2001).
13 D. F. O’Brien, M. A. Baldo, M. E. Thompson, and S. R.
Forrest, Appl. Phys. Lett., 74, 442 (1999).
Current density (J) / mA cm
Figure 1. EL devices fabricated by Ir(ppy)3 and 1a: a) EL
structures, b) current density-applied voltage curves, c) EL effi-
ciency-current density curves.
14 L. J. Henderson, Jr., F. R. Fronczek, and W. R. Cherry, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 106, 5876 (1984).
15 M. Yamada, J. Sun, Y. Suda, and T. Nakaya, Chem. Lett.,
1998, 1055.
16 J. J. P. Stewart, J. Comput. Chem., 10, 209 (1989); J. J. P.
Stewart, J. Comput. Chem., 10, 221 (1989).
17 M. Uchida, T. Izumizawa, T. Nakano, S. Yamaguchi, K.
Tamao, and K. Furukawa, Chem. Mater., 13, 2680 (2001).
18 G. Gu, D. Z. Garbuzov, P. E. Burrows, S. Venkatesh, S. R.
Forrest, and M. E. Thompson, Opt. Lett., 22, 396 (1997).
Figure 1c shows external EL efficiency (ꢁ) on the current
density (J). The efficiency of device 1 is higher than that of de-
vice 4 within the measured current density, indicating more ef-
fective recombination at the emitting layer of device 1. Com-
pound 1a is superior to BCP as a hole-blocking material. The
EL efficiency of device 2 is not different from that of device
1. On the other hand, significant increase of the efficiency was
observed in device 3. Thus, the efficiency is 1.5 times higher
than that of device 4. A maximum external efficiency reached
Published on the web (Advance View) February 9, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.276