Notes
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 20, 1997 7019
Ta ble 2. In itia l Con cen tr a tion s a n d Ra te Con sta n tsa for
th e Rea ction of Tr a n s Th iir a n iu m Ion 2 w ith Wa ter , in
CD2Cl2 a t 25 °C (cf. Sch em e 2)
the known rearrangement of thiiranium ion 2 to thieta-
nium ion 7,3 the reaction shown in Scheme 1 can be
suggested. The attack of water on a ring carbon atom of
the cis thiiranium ion 1 gives the threo alcohol 5+, in
equilibrium with its conjugate base 5; both species will
readily assume the most stable conformation (with an-
tiperiplanar tert-butyl groups) which prevents the an-
chimeric assistance by the nucleophilic methylthio group
to the detachment of the hydroxyl group. The threo
alcohol 5 undergoes the acid-catalyzed nucleophilic sub-
stitution by a water molecule, yielding the epimeric
erythro alcohol 6. This latter gives, in an acid-catalyzed
process, trans thiiranium ion 2, which then rearranges
to the stable thietanium ion 7.15
[2], M
[H2O], M
kS, M-1 s-1
kR, s-1
1
2
1.4 × 10-2 5.7 × 10-2 3.6((1.1) x 10-5 10.4((0.5) x 10-6
1.2 × 10-2 1.9 × 10-2 5.9((1.0) x 10-5 11.2((0.8) x 10-6
a
Average and statndard deviation from three determinations.
in Table 2. The rate constants kR are in good agreement
with those measured in the case of the reactions of the
cis thiiranium ion 1 (Table 1).
A further point deserves a comment. No traces of E
olefin 4 could be detected in the reaction of thiiranium
ion 1, which also generates thiiranium ion 2, although
the reaction of authentic 2 gives rise to a small amount
of the same olefin. We propose the following rationale.
The attack of water to the ring carbons of 1 is about 2
orders of magnitude faster that the attack to sulfonium
sulfur of 2. Thus, during the greatest part of the reac-
tion, water is effectively sequestered by 1 in the form of
threo alcohol 5 or is deactivated as nucleophile by
protonation so that the attack to the newly formed
thiiranium ion 2 is minimized. The E olefin 4 might be
generated, but at such a low concentration to escape
detection.
The proposed mechanism is supported by an indepen-
dent experiment. The addition of CF3SO3H to a solution
of the threo alcohol 5 in CD2Cl2, obtained using an excess
of water, shows indeed that alcohol 5 is converted to trans
thiiranium ion 2 and, subsequently, to thietanium ion
7.
As the key point in the reaction Scheme 1 is the acid-
catalyzed interconversion of alcohols 5 and 6, the behav-
ior of cis thiiranium ion 1 with a large excess of water
may be understood: under these conditions the generated
threo alcohol 5 is not effectively protonated.
The differential equations related to the consecutive
and competitive reactions shown in Scheme 1 have been
numerically integrated16 and fitted (with a Simplex
procedure17) to the concentrations of 1, 2, and 7 and the
sum of the concentration of 5 and 5+. The most relevant
rate constants kC, describing the consumption of cis
thiiranium ion 1 by reaction with water, and kR, for the
rearrangement of the trans thiiranium ion 2 to thieta-
nium ion 7, are reported in Table 1.
The results herein reported outline the different reac-
tivity modes of cis and trans thiiranium ions 1 and 2,
even though the study is limited to only one nucleophile
and to a small range of concentrations. The reactivity
modes seem to be highly specific, and within the detection
1
limits of H NMR spectroscopy, the competitive attacks
at sulfur in cis thiiranium ion 1 and at the ring carbon
in trans thiiranium ion 2 may be considered at least 2
orders of magnitude slower than the observed ones.
Ta ble 1. In itia l Con cen tr a tion s a n d Ra te Con sta n tsa for
th e Rea ction of Cis Th iir a n iu m Ion 1 w ith Wa ter , in
CD2Cl2 a t 25 °C (cf Sch em e 1)
If the different behavior of thiiranium ions 1 and 2
toward the nucleophile water holds for other nucleo-
philes, and particularly for halide ions, then these results
call for a reconsideration in interpreting the reactivities
of Z and E di-tert-butylethylene 3 and 4 toward sulfenyl
chlorides and other electrophiles. The relevant rate ratio
of 1.6 × 105 measured for the addition of 4-chloroben-
zenesulfenyl chloride to isomers 3 and 418 is to be
compared with the much reduced rate ratios of 13.6 for
the addition of bromine19 and of 0.37 for the addition of
chlorine.20
-1
[1], M
[H2O], M
kC, M-1 s
kR, s-1
1
2
7.5 × 10-3 8.4 × 10-2
9.6((0.4) x 10-4
6.6 × 10-3 4.7 × 10-3 11.9((1.5) x 10-4 8.9((0.5) x 10-6
a
Average and standard deviation from three determinations.
Sch em e 2
The huge reactivity ratio for the addition of the sulfenyl
chloride was explained by invoking the spatial charac-
teristic of the olefins, i.e., by the greater steric hindrance
opposed to the approaching electrophile by two trans tert-
butyl groups than by two cis group.18 This rationalization
cannot account for the smaller reactivity ratios for the
addition of the halogens. Rather, the different spatial
characteristics of the electrophiles sulfenyl chloride and
bromine have been invoked.19 In thiiranium ions 10
(Scheme 3) the S-R′ bond is nearly perpendicular to the
three-membered ring;21 if this orientation is already
present in the transition state, then a nonbonding
interaction between R′ of the sulfenyl chloride 9 and the
cis-oriented tert-butyl group may lower the addition rate
to olefin 4.
Under the same reaction conditions we monitored the
behavior of trans thiiranium ion 2 in the presence of
water. We could follow the formation of thietanium ion
7 and of different amounts of the E di-tert-butylethylene
4, depending on water concentration. No trace of erythro
alcohol 6 could be observed. The reaction is therefore
described by Scheme 2. The related differential equa-
tions, integrated and fitted to the concentrations of 2, 4,
and 7, give the selected rate constants kS and kR reported
(15) This hypothesis is in agreement with the formation of thiira-
nium ion 2 from erythro-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-4-(methylthio)-3-chloro-
hexane in liquid SO2, as reported in ref 3.
(16) Press, W. H.; Flannery, B. P.; Teukolsky, S. A.; Vetterling, W.
T. Numerical Recipes. The Art of Scientific Computing; Cambridge
University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1986; p 547.
(17) Nash, J . C. Compact Numerical Methods for Computers; Adam
Hilger Ltd.: Bristol, U.K., 1979; p 141.
(18) Dean, C. L.; Garratt, D. G.; Tidwell, T. T.; Schmid, G. H. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 4958.
(19) Ruasse, M. F., Argile, A., Bienvenue-Goe¨tz, E., Dubois, J . E. J .
Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 2758.
(20) Fahey, R. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 4681.