Published on Web 03/14/2003
1H Fast MAS NMR Studies of Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions
in Self-Assembled Monolayers
†
‡
‡
‡
†
Shane Pawsey, Mark McCormick, Susan De Paul, Robert Graf, Y. S. Lee,
,
†
,‡
Linda Reven,* and Hans W. Spiess*
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry, McGill UniVersity, 801 Sherbrooke Street West,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2K6, and Max-Planck-Institut f u¨ r Polymerforschung,
Postfach 3148, D-55021 Mainz, Germany
Abstract: The structures formed by the adsorption of carboxyalkylphosphonic acids on metal oxides were
1
1
investigated by H fast magic angle spinning (MAS), heteronuclear correlation (HETCOR), and H double-
quantum (DQ) MAS solid-state NMR experiments. The diacids HO C(CH PO (n ) 2, 3, 11, and 15)
were adsorbed on TiO and two types of ZrO powders having average particle sizes of 20, 30, and 5 nm,
respectively. Carboxyalkylphosphonic acids bind selectively via the phosphonate group, forming monolayers
with pendant carboxylic acid groups. Whereas dipolar coupled P-OH protons are detected on TiO , there
are only isolated residual P-OH groups on ZrO , reflecting the relative binding strengths of phosphonic
acids on these two substrates. From a comparative H MAS NMR study with an analogous monolayer
system, HO C(CH SH coated gold nanoparticles, the hydrogen-bonding network at the monolayer/air
2
)
2 n
3 2
H
2
2
2
2
1
2
2 7
)
interface is found to be quite disordered, at least for SAMs deposited on nonplanar substrates. Whereas
only hydrogen-bonded homodimers occur in the bulk diacids, hydrogen bonding between the carboxylic
and phosphonic acid groups is present in multilayers of the diacids on the ZrO nanopowder.
2
1
. Introduction
to treat industrial materials and minerals containing alumina,
1
1
iron, and tin. Titanium surfaces have been modified with
phosphonic acids to improve the bone binding of medical
Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) are widely used to
introduce different chemical functionalities on metal and metal
oxide substrates. With the exception of silanes on silica, the
modification of metal oxide surfaces with SAMs is poorly
developed. For metal oxides other than silica, long chain
carboxylic acids have been the surfactants of choice to form
SAMs, but there are relatively few studies as compared to the
1
5
implants and for photoelectrochemical cells based on poly-
16,17
crystalline titanium dioxide films.
More exotic metal oxides,
such as tantalum and niobium oxides, have been derivatized
with self-assembled monolayers of alkyl phosphonates for sensor
3
-5
development.
1
We have recently shown that phosphonic acid based SAMs
can be used to introduce polar functional groups on metal
thiol/gold or silane/silica systems. Limitations of the fatty acid
SAMs include the stability of the surface bond which is ionic
rather than covalent and the possibility of forming undesirable
looping structures for surfactants of the type X(CH2)nCO2H,
where X is some other polar functionality.1,2 Alkyl phosphonates
1
4 31
13
oxides.
P and C solid-state NMR and vibrational spectro-
scopic studies of carboxyalkylphosphonic acids, HO2C(CH2)n-
PO3H2, deposited on TiO2 and ZrO2 powders demonstrate that
the PO3H2 group binds preferentially, creating pendant car-
boxylic acid groups. This particular surfactant is an important
test case as elemental analysis indicates a high degree of surface
and phosphonic acids present an attractive alternative because
they bind more strongly than carboxylic acids to a wide range
of metal oxides.3
-14
Phosphonic acids are commonly employed
1
3
coverage, and spectroscopic data ( C NMR and FT-IR) show
that long chain carboxylic and phosphonic acids both form
as corrosion inhibitors, adhesion promoters, and flotation agents
†
McGill University.
Max-Planck-Institut f u¨ r Polymerforschung.
‡
(10) Shafi, K. V. P. M.; Ulman, A.; Yan, X.; Yang, N.-L.; Estournes, C.; White,
H.; Rafailovich, M. Langmuir 2001, 17, 5093-7.
(
(
(
1) Ulman, A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 1533-54.
2) Pawsey, S.; Yach, K.; Halla, J.; Reven, L. Langmuir 2000, 16, 3294-303.
3) Brovelli, D.; Haehner, G.; Ruiz, L.; Hofer, R.; Kraus, G.; Waldner, A.;
Schloesser, J.; Oroszlan, P.; Ehrat, M.; Spencer, N. D. Langmuir 1999, 15,
(11) Van Alsten, J. G. Langmuir 1999, 15, 7605-14.
(12) Gao, W.; Dickinson, L.; Grozinger, C.; Morin, F. G.; Reven, L. Langmuir
1997, 13, 115-8.
4
324-7.
(13) Gao, W.; Dickinson, L.; Grozinger, C.; Morin, F. G.; Reven, L. Langmuir
1996, 12, 6429-35.
(
4) Textor, M.; Ruiz, L.; Hofer, R.; Rossi, A.; Feldman, K.; Haehner, G.;
Spencer, N. D. Langmuir 2000, 16, 3257-71.
(14) Pawsey, S.; Yach, K.; Reven, L. Langmuir 2002, 18, 5205-12.
(15) Viornery, C.; Chevolot, Y.; Leonard, D.; Aronsson, B.-O.; Pechy, P.;
Mathieu, H. J.; Descouts, P.; Graetzel, M. Langmuir 2002, 18, 2582-9.
(16) Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Pechy, P.; Rotzinger, F. P.;
Humphry-Baker, R.; Kalyanasundaram, K.; Graetzel, M.; Shklover, V.;
Haibach, T. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 5937-46.
(
(
5) Hofer, R.; Textor, M.; Spencer, N. D. Langmuir 2001, 17, 4014-20.
6) Woodward, J. T.; Ulman, A.; Schwartz, D. K. Langmuir 1996, 12, 3626-
9
.
(
(
7) Woodward, J. T.; Schwartz, D. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7861-2.
8) Woodward, J. T.; Doudevski, I.; Sikes, H. D.; Schwartz, D. K. J. Phys.
Chem. B 1997, 101, 7535-41.
(17) Bonhote, P.; Moser, J.-E.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Vlachopoulos, N.;
Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Walder, L.; Graetzel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 1324-36.
(
9) Yee, C.; Kataby, G.; Ulman, A.; Prozorov, T.; White, H.; King, A.;
Rafailovich, M.; Sokolov, J.; Gedanken, A. Langmuir 1999, 15, 7111-5.
4174
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2003, 125, 4174-4184
10.1021/ja029008u CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society