(<400 nm). The introduction of the rhodamine moiety to
construct probes of the “off-on” type is a reliable method
because of the well-known spirolactam (fluorescence “off”)
to ring-opened amide (fluorescence “on”) equilibrium (Figure
1) of rhodamine derivatives.6 We have successfully designed
range immediately as a result of the Cu(II)-induced ring
opening of the spirolactam form. We also found that a
solution of 10 µM 1 in 50% (v/v) buffered (10 mM Tris-
HCl, pH ) 7.0) water/CH3CN could display an obvious
purple color in the presence of Cu(II) at the micromolar level,
and other ions of our interest showed little interference
(Figure 2). These results suggested that 1 could serve as a
Figure 1. Chemical structures of compound 1, 1-Cu(II),5 and 2.
a fluorescence chemosensor for Fe(III) utilizing rhodamine
B as the fluorophore in our previous work.6d Herein, we
describe a new rhodamine-based chemosensor 1 (Figure 1),
which shows a reversible, selective, and sensitive fluores-
cence enhancement response to Cu(II) in neutral buffered
media.
Figure 2. Pictures of 10 µM 1 as a selective naked-eye chemosen-
sor for Cu(II) in 50% (v/v) water/CH3CN (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
) 7.0). Top (from left to right): 0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 µM Cu(II). Bottom
(from left to right): 50 µM Fe(III), Fe(II), Zn(II), Pb(II), Hg(II).
Compound 1 was facilely synthesized from rhodamine B
by a two-step reaction (Supporting Information, S-Figure 1).
This Shiff base was stable in neutral water solutions for at
least 2 days. It was designed to chelate with metal ions via
its carbonyl O, imino N, and phenol O atoms.7 The
spirolactam moiety of the rhodamine group acted as a signal
switcher, which was envisioned to turn on when the cation
was bound. A solution of 1 in Tris-HCl buffer (5 mM, pH
) 7.0) or organic media is colorless and weakly fluorescent,
indicating that the spirolactam form of 1 exists predomi-
nantly. The characteristic peak of the 9-carbon of 1 near 66
ppm in the 13C NMR spectrum (Supporting Information,
S-Figure 2d) also supports this consideration.8 Besides, no
obvious characteristic color or fluorescence of rhodamine
could be observed for 1 between pH 5.0 and 10.0 (Supporting
Information, S-Figure 3), suggesting that 1 is insensitive to
pH and that the spirolactam form is still preferred in this
range. As we expected, addition of Cu(II) to a solution of 1
in either CH3CN or water caused a significant enhancement
of absorbance and fluorescence intensity in the 500-650 nm
“naked-eye” chemosensor selective for Cu(II) in neutral
buffered media.
The absorption spectra of 1 (10 µM) in 50% (v/v) water/
CH3CN (10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH ) 7.0) exhibited only
a very weak band above 500 nm, which was ascribed to the
trace ring-opened form of molecules of 1. Upon the addition
of up to 5 equiv of Cu(II), the absorbance was significantly
enhanced (> 500-fold) and a new peak at 558 nm was
observed (Figure 3a), suggesting the clear formation of the
ring-opened amide form of 1. Other metal ions had little
interference. Only Fe(II) displayed a 65-fold enhancement
at the same concentration, but a much longer response time
was required (Supporting Information, S-Figure 4a-d). The
nonlinear fitting of the titration curve assumed a 1:1
stoichiometry for the 1-Cu(II) complex (Figure 1) with an
association constant Ka value of far more than 106,9 showing
the high affinity of 1 to Cu(II). This binding mode was also
supported by the data of Job’s plots10 evaluated from the
absorption spectra of 1 and Cu(II) with a total concentration
of 3.3 µM (Supporting Information, S-Figure 5). A more
direct evidence was obtained by comparing the ESI mass
spectra of 1 and 1-Cu(II) (Figure 4). The unique peak at
m/z ) 622.5 (calcd ) 622.3) corresponding to [1 + Cu-
H]+ was clearly observed when 1.2 equiv of Cu(II) was
(5) The copper ion may be chelated by the counteranion or solvent
oxygen to satisfy the need for four-coordination. They are omitted for clarity.
(6) For rhodamine-based chemosensors for metal ions, see: (a) Dujols,
V.; Ford, F.; Czarnik, A. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7386. (b) Yang,
Y.-K.; Yook, K.-J.; Tae, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16760. (c) Kwon,
J. Y.; Jang, Y. J.; Lee, Y. J.; Kim, K. M.; Seo, M. S.; Nam, W.; Yoon, J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10107. (d) Xiang, Y.; Tong, A. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 1549.
(7) Lee, P. F.; Yang, C.-T.; Fan, D.; Vittal, J. J.; Ranford, J. D.
Polyhedron 2003, 22, 2781.
(8) Anthoni, U.; Christophersen, C.; Nielsen, P.; Puschl, A.; Schaumburg,
K. Struct. Chem. 1995, 3, 161.
(9) (a) Connors, K. A. Binding Constants-The Measurement of Molecular
Complex Stability; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1987; Chapter 4.
(10) Vosburgh, W. C.; Cooper, G. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1941, 63, 437.
2864
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 13, 2006