D. Iselt et al. / Electrochimica Acta 56 (2011) 5178–5183
5179
highly negative standard potential of Ga3+/Ga (E00 = −0.560 V) [23]
and its strong tendency to hydrolyse [24]. McGary reported first
on the electrochemical deposition of Fe–Ga alloys, the fabrication
of nanoscale Galfenol structures [26] and their use as sensor sys-
tems for sonar applications [10]. Using a Watt’s type electrolyte
containing iron(II) and gallium(III) sulphates, boric acid and ascor-
bic acid Fe–Ga nanowire arrays have been deposited into anodic
aluminium oxide templates at a constant potential of −1.36 V.
The Ga content was found to decrease along the length of the
wires and the nanowire arrays were magnetically soft and slightly
anisotropic [26]. However, even for films no crystalline Fe–Ga phase
was observed [10] and no statement was made about the oxygen
content of the deposit. Another group investigated the electro-
chemical fabrication of magnetic multilayered films and nanowire
arrays containing Fe–Ga in order to achieve novel magnetostrictive
behaviour [27,28]. By adjusting both, the electrolyte composition
and deposition potential, Fe78Ga22 films with a crystalline (Fe, Ga)
solid-solution phase were obtained. Multilayered nanowire arrays
were deposited from a single electrolyte by applying different con-
stant potentials. A novel magnetostrictive behaviour was explained
by the formation of twisted spin structures. Very recently, a detailed
study of Fe–Ga codeposition was published by McGary [29]. Using
a Hull cell, where the deposition current density varies across the
cathode, metallic iron, Galfenol, oxide and Ga-rich metal films have
been produced. Complexing the Ga ions with citrate and varying the
3
+
2+
ratio of Ga /Fe ions and the current density allowed to control
the composition as well as grain size and texture of the alloy.
Our present study aims on the preparation and detailed char-
acterization of Fe–Ga alloy films with a gallium concentration of
around 20 at.%. The particular focus is to investigate the origin of the
high oxygen content and to identify appropriate deposition param-
eters for homogeneous, dense alloy films with low oxygen content
that are promising to achieve a high magnetostriction constant.
Fig. 1. (a) Current–potential curves of single element and complete electrolytes on
Au substrates, scan rate 10 mV s−1 and (b) ratio of Ga in potentiostatically deposited
Fe100−xGax films on Au substrates in dependence on the deposition potential.
Cu-K␣ radiation. For magnetic measurements a vibration sample
magnetometer (VSM, Quantum Design PPMS) at 300 K was used.
Hysteresis loops were measured parallel and perpendicular to the
substrate plane using low background signal quartz holders.
2
. Experimental details
Oxidized (1 0 0)Si wafers were coated with either Au or Pt which
3. Results and discussion
acts as working electrodes for the deposition experiments. Based
on McGary’s work [10] the electrolyte consists of an aqueous solu-
tion of 0.3 M FeSO ·7H O, 0.06 M Ga (SO ) ·18H O, 0.5 M boric acid
In order to identify the suitable potential range for the co-
deposition of Fe and Ga potentiodynamic current–potential curves
of both single element and complete electrolytes have been per-
formed, shown in Fig. 1. The cathodic polarization of pure Fe
solution (red dotted curve in Fig. 1a) starts with a first step at
−0.6 V which is attributed to proton reduction. The following
strong current increase, starting at around −1.05 V, represents
the iron reduction overlapped by water decomposition. The
current–potential curve of the pure Ga3+ solution (blue dashed
curve in Fig. 1a) is characterized by a continuous current increase
starting at −0.7 V. The first step observed in Fe solution does not
occur, pointing out the inhibition of proton reduction. This, as well
as the much smaller slope compared to the Fe2+ solution, might be
explained by a passivation of the electrode surface by hydrolysis
products of Ga. The starting point of Ga3+ reduction cannot be iden-
tified because of its potential overlapping with the one for water
decomposition. The behaviour of the complete electrolyte (black
solid curve in Fig. 1a) is similar to the Ga3+ solution down to −0.95 V.
Afterwards a two step behaviour is observed that approaches the
current density of the iron solution at potentials around −2.0 V.
Potentiostatic deposition experiments from the single element
solutions provide stable films at potentials E ≤ −1.0 V for iron and
E ≤ −1.8 V for Ga, in contrast to the results reported by Flamini
et al. [24] who quote the suitable deposition potential for Ga
as E ≤ −1.58 V. Potentiostatically deposited films from the com-
plete electrolyte are unstable at potentials more positive than
−1.3 V, dissolving immediately under gas evolution after stopping
4
2
2
4
3
2
(
H BO ) as a buffer and 0.04 M ascorbic acid (C H O ) as an antiox-
3 3 6 8 6
idant agent, where the pH was adjusted to 1.5 by adding sulphuric
acid. For each experiment 20 ml of fresh electrolyte was used. All
deposition experiments were performed at room temperature in
a three electrode arrangement placed in a Teflon cell. A Pt sheet
was used as the counter electrode and a Saturated Calomel Elec-
trode (SCE) as reference electrode. The electrode potentials all refer
to the potential of the SCE (−241 mVSHE). Deposition experiments
were carried out using an EG&G Potentiostat/Galvanostat Model
2+
2
63A.
Sample surface and cross sectional morphologies as well as
film thickness were examined using high-resolution scanning elec-
tron microscopy (HR-SEM Leo 1530 Gemini, Zeiss) and focused
ion beam technique (FIB, Zeiss Cross Beam 1540XB), respectively.
The integral composition was obtained by energy dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy (EDX, Leo 1530 Gemini, Zeiss with Si(Li)-detector).
To estimate the oxygen content and the detailed oxygen binding
behaviour depth profiles were measured by Auger electron spec-
troscopy (AES, PHI Model 660 Scanning Auger Microprobe, Physical
Electronics) and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS, PHI 5600
CI, Physical Electronics, Excitation: Mg-K␣ radiation, sputtering:
+
Ar -ions 3.5 keV, 3 nm/min sputter abrasion). The structure was
analysed by X-ray diffraction in Bragg–Brentano geometry (XRD,
Phillips PW 3400, Co-K␣ radiation) and the texture by pole figure
measurements using a Philips X‘Pert 108 Texture Goniometer with