M. Mehdi Afsahi et al. / Thermochimica Acta 473 (2008) 61–67
[2] S.K. Srivastava, B.N. Avasthi, J. Mater. Sci. 28 (18) (1993) 5032–5035.
67
Similarity between the activation energy obtained from two
[
[
3] J. Chen, S.L. Li, Z.L. Tao, J. Alloys Compd. 356–357 (2003) 413–417.
4] H.W. Wang, P. Skeldon, G.E. Thompson, G.C. Wood, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (2) (1997)
97–502.
[5] K. Du, W. Fu, R. Wei, H. Yang, S. Liu, S. Yu, G. Zou, Mater. Lett. 61 (27) (2007)
887–4889.
different methods supports the kinetic triplet obtained from the
shrinking unreacted core model.
It may be observed from Fig. 14 that dependency of activation
energy on conversion is rather weak, decreasing at the early stages
but increasing towards the end of the reaction. The changes in E
with conversion may be described as follows.
4
4
[
[
6] J.C. Wildervanck, F. Jellinek, Z. Anorg, Allgem. Chem. 328 (1964) 309–318.
7] H.W. Wang, P. Skeldon, G.E. Thompson, G.C. Wood, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 15 (6)
(1996) 494–496.
Nucleation, nuclei growth and diffusion of the gaseous product
provide the effective parameters that will determine the activation
energy. Interaction of these phenomena is such that at the start of
reaction, the activation energy is decreased. However, during a wide
range of conversion, the latter remains almost unchanged. Finally,
at the later stages of the reduction the activation energy is increased
rapidly with conversion. This observation may be explained by not-
ing that at the beginning of the reaction, the product layer imposes
a negligible resistance to the overall rate. However, as the result of
nuclei growth during the reaction, activation energy is decreased.
On the other hand, at the final stages of the reaction, formation of
a thick layer hinders the movement of gases towards the reaction
zone, leading to higher activation energy.
[8] Y. Feldman, E. Wasserman, D.J. Srolovitz, R. Tenne, Science 267 (5195) (1995)
22–225.
9] H.F. Barry, Lubricat. Eng. 33 (9) (1977) 475–480.
[10] J.P.G. Farr, Wear 35 (1975) 1–22.
[11] W.O. Winer, Wear 10 (1967) 422–452.
12] J.M. Martin, in: D. Dowson (Ed.), Molybdenum Disulphide Lubrication, Tribol-
ogy Series, vol. 35, 1999.
13] W. Hai-Dou, X. Bin-Shi, L. Jia-Jun, Z. Da-Ming, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 6 (5)
(2005) 535–539.
2
[
[
[
[
[
[
14] S. Watanabe, J. Noshiro, S. Miyake, Surf. Coat. Technol. 183 (2–3) (2004) 347–
351.
15] J. Xu, M.H. Zhu, Z.R. Zhou, Ph. Kapsa, L. Vincent, Wear 255 (1–6) (2003) 253–
258.
16] N.M. Renevier, J. Hamphire, V.C. Fox, J. Witts, T. Allen, D.G. Teer, Surf. Coat.
Technol. 142–144 (2001) 67–77.
17] L. Cizaire, B. Vacher, T. Le Mogne, J.M. Martin, L. Rapoport, A. Margolin, R. Tenne,
Surf. Coat. Technol. 160 (2–3) (2002) 282–287.
18] K. Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, fourth ed., John Wiley & Sons,
New York, 1998.
19] H. Kay, in: W.A. Krivsky (Ed.), High-Temperature Refractory Metals, Gordon and
Breach, New York, NY, 1968, p. 33.
[
[
In a previous study (Mehdi Afsahi et al., submitted for publica-
tion, A model for the intrinsic kinetic of the direct reduction of MoS2
with hydrogen), the intrinsic kinetic parameters for reduction of flat
pellets were determined, applying nucleation and growth models.
[
[20] F. Habashi, R. Dugdale, Metall. Trans. B 4 (1973) 1865–1871.
[21] P.M. Prasad, T.R. Mankhand, P. Suryaprakash Rao, Miner. Eng. 6 (8–10) (1993)
−
1
The activation energy was found to be 135.4 kJ mol which is close
to the value determined in the present work.
8
57–871.
[22] P. Suryaprakash Rao, P.M. Prasad, Mater. Trans. JIM 34 (12) (1993) 1229–
233.
1
[
[
[
23] J.D. Ford, M.A. Fahim, Metall. Trans. B 6 (1975) 461–464.
24] F. Habashi, B.J. Yostos, J. Metals 29 (7) (1977) 11–16.
25] A. Roine, HSC Chemistry 6.0, Chemical Reaction and Equilibrium Software with
Extensive Thermochemical Database and Flowsheet Simulation, Outokumpu
Research Oy Information Center, August 2006.
5
. Conclusions
In the present work variables affecting the reaction between
MoS2 powders and hydrogen gas were investigated. The data were
analyzed using shrinking unreacted core model and compared with
the free model method. The reaction rate constant was correlated
by the following equation:
[26] P.K. Tripathy, R.H. Rakhasia, Miner. Process. Extract. Metall. 115 (1) (2006) 8–
14.
[27] P.M. Prasad, P. Surya Prakash Rao, S.N. Singh, A.J.K. Prasad, T.R. Mankhand,
Metall. Mater. Trans. B: Process Metall. Mater. Process. Sci. 33 (3) (2002)
ꢀ
ꢁ
345–354.
4
3
−1.67×10
−1
k = 3.91 × 10 exp
(cm min )
[28] R. Padilla, M.C. Ruiz, H.Y. Sohn, Metall. Mater. Trans. B: Process Metall. Mater.
Process. Sci. 28 (2) (1997) 265–274.
[29] R.E. Cech, T.D. Tiemann, TMS AIME 245 (1969) 1727–1733.
[30] M.A. Fahim, J.D. Ford, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 54 (1976) 578–583.
T
It was found that the reaction rate was first order with respect
to hydrogen gas concentration. This work is used as a foundation
for further studies in the formation of Mo from molybdenite with
hydrogen as the reducing agent and CaO as the sulphur scavenging
agents.
[
31] T. Chida, J.D. Ford, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 55 (1977) 313–316.
[32] H.Y. Sohn, S. Won, Metall. Trans. B 16 (1985) 831–839.
[33] F. Ullmann, Ulmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, vol. 22, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2003, p. 26.
[
34] J. Szekely, J.W. Evans, H.Y. Sohn, Gas–Solid Reactions, Academic Press Inc., New
York, 1976.
References
[35] S. Vyazovkin, C.A. Wight, Thermochim. Acta 340 (341) (1999) 53–68.
36] S. Vyazovkin, Thermochim. Acta 355 (2000) 155–163.
[37] S. Vyazovkin, C.A. Wight, Chem. Mater. 11 (1999) 3386–3393.
[
[
1] L. Chang, H. Yang, J. Li, W. Fu, Y. Du, K. Du, Q. Yu, J. Xu, M. Li, Nanotechnology 17
(
2006) 3827–3831.