1340
LEVINSKY et al.
Eq. (6) gives values many orders of magnitude below
those observed in experiment. Therefore, in what fol-
lows the effect of transport via molybdenum vapor can
be neglected.
As shown by Jehn [4], the presence of solid molyb-
denum in the Mo–O–H system leads to the formation of
solid MoO2 (the lower molybdenum oxide) and
åÓé2(éç)2 vapor even at very small amounts of oxy-
At 800, 900, and 1000°C, the Dg of åÓO2(OH)2
molecules is 2.17 × 10–5, 2.48 × 10–5, and 2.80 × 10–5
m2/s, respectively.
Under the conditions of our experiments, pH and
2
pH O, needed to find pMoO (OH) by Eq. (8), may
2
2
2
depend on two factors. First, the starting hydrogen has
a certain humidity. In flowing hydrogen, to this humid-
ity corresponds a constant water vapor pressure over
the molybdenum powder. Second, the starting powder
contains oxygen, and its traces are present in the final
product. This suggests that, throughout a given experi-
ment, the water vapor pressure may be determined by
equilibrium in the hydrogen reduction of the lower
molybdenum oxide.
gen and, accordingly, a low
partial pressure and
pH O
2
small pH O/pH ratio. Vapor transport and growth of
2
2
powder particles proceed with the participation of
åÓé2(éç)2 molecules, which form by the reaction
åÓé2(s) + 2ç2é(g) = åÓé2(éç)2 (g) + ç2, (7)
p
p
MoO2(OH)2 H2
In the former case, the water vapor pressure must be
constant, independent of the annealing temperature and
duration. For hydrogen with a dew point of –5°C, the
water pressure is 4.162 × 10–3 Pa. Substituting this water
vapor pressure and a hydrogen pressure of 105 Pa into
Eq. (8) and using the temperature dependence of the
equilibrium constant of reaction (7), we find that
--------------------------------
Kp(7)
=
.
(8)
2
p
H2O
The temperature dependence of this constant was deter-
mined by Jehn [4].
In addition, the vapor phase contains a variety of
oxide species. åÓ3é9, one the most stable oxides, with
the highest partial pressure, may form by the reaction
pMoO (OH) p∞ at 800, 900, and 1000°C is 8.7 × 10–8,
2
2
7.8 × 10–7, and 4.9 × 10–6 Pa, respectively. Substituting
these p∞ values and the corresponding Dg values into
Eq. (6) gives an increase in the radius of molybdenum
particles below the experimentally determined value by
more than one order of magnitude.
3åÓ3é2(éç)2(g) = åÓ3é9(g) + 3ç2é.
(9)
The equilibrium constant of this reaction is such
that, even at low water partial pressures (103 Pa), the
åÓ3é9(g) partial pressure is three orders of magnitude
below the åÓ2(éç)2(g) partial pressure.
In the latter case, the hydrogen pressure is deter-
mined by equilibrium in the reaction
Volatile molybdenum oxides may also form through
direct reaction between condensed molybdenum and
oxygen impurities, which are always present in gases
nonreactive with molybdenum. As shown in our exper-
iments, the weight loss during annealing in helium
(marked by two asterisks in Table 1) is substantially
lower than that in hydrogen, and therefore the mass
transport is predominantly due to åÓé2(éç)2 mole-
cules.
0.5åÓé2(s) + ç2(g) = 0.5åÓ + ç2é(g).
(10)
The equilibrium constant of this reaction, K =
pH /pH O , as a function of temperature has the form [5]
2
2
1383.2
---------------
T
logKp = 0.8799 –
.
(11)
Combining this equation with (5) and taking into
account that the total pressure is 105 Pa, we find that
pMoO (OH) at 800, 900, and 1000°C is 5.5 × 10–4, 7.5 ×
10–3, and 6.8 × 10–2 Pa, respectively, which is about four
orders of magnitude higher in comparison with the
former case.
The gas-phase diffusion coefficient of åÓé2(éç)2
was evaluated using the well-known formula Dg =
uλ/3, where u is the average speed of diffusant mole-
cules in the gas phase (m/s):
2
2
8kT
u = --------- = ----------,
πm πM
8RT
The pMoO (OH) and Dg MoO (OH) values thus
2
2
2
2
kT
obtained were used to evaluate the increase in particle
------------------------------------------------------------
λ =
.
size by Eq. (6) with V0 = 2.02 × 10–5 m3/mol and σ =
2π(rMoO (OH) + rH )2 pΣ
2
2
2
1.0 J/m2. The calculated particle sizes of the annealed
samples dcalc are listed in Table 1. The experimentally
determined average particle sizes are of the same order
as the values calculated by Eq. (6). This provides solid
evidence that the main mechanism behind the coagula-
tion of molybdenum particles during hydrogen anneal-
ing at temperatures from 800 to 1000°C is mass trans-
port by åÓé2(éç)2 vapor.
Here m is the molecular mass of the diffusant (kg), å is
its molar mass (kg/mol), λ is the mean free path of dif-
fusant molecules (m), rMoO (OH) is the molecular
2
2
radius of åÓO2(OH)2 (3 × 10–10 m), rH is the molecu-
lar radius of hydrogen (1.35 × 10–10 m), and pΣ is the
total pressure in the system (1.013 × 105 Pa).
2
INORGANIC MATERIALS Vol. 45 No. 12 2009