9
938
Y.-C. Weng et al. / Electrochimica Acta 56 (2011) 9937–9945
Au/Al
2
O
3
3. Results and discussion
3
3
.1. Microstructure investigation of the Ni–Pt electrode
0.3 cm
.1.1. Morphology investigation
The portion of the Ni–Pt electrode with a Ni matrix contained
agglomerated spinodal crystals whereas the portion with a Pt
matrix was characterized by coarse grains. The local morphology
of the Ni–Pt electrode varied according to the local matrix. Fig. 1(a)
shows an erinaceous surface that was observed on a Ni crystal.
Ni film was particularly notable on the embedded needles. The
three images of Fig. 1(b)–(d) show how Pt caused the spinodal sur-
faces to mix with the particle phases. These images indicate that Pt
atoms affected crystallization as they blended into the Ni crystal lat-
tices. Fig. 1(e) shows a surface for which all spinodal crystals were
replaced with coarse particles. The high sensitivity of the surface
was determined by two conditions: a high specific area, i.e., high
surface area per unit weight of crystal, and a sensitive preferred
crystal orientation on the electrode [17]. Fig. 1(a) shows a spinodal
surface with a large specific area; Fig. 1(e) shows a coarse surface
littered with agglomerate particles. With regard to the preferred
crystal orientation, we discuss in Section 3.1.2 how crystallization
can be identified by diffraction patterns.
2 3
Al O substrate
1.4 cm
Scheme 1. The screen printing pattern for the conductive Au paste.
in an acetone bath for 20 min to remove the organic coating. The
cleaned slices were then rinsed with deionized (DI) water and dried
in an oven at 100 C for 20 min. A “doctor blade” screen-printing
process [14] was used to deposit conductive gold paste (Heraeus
C-5754B, 87.5%) onto each aluminum substrate to form the pattern
shown in Scheme 1. Each as-printed substrate was maintained at
◦
◦
1
50 C for 40 min to evaporate the solvent in the paste and was
◦
then heated in a furnace (CHEMIST DF20) at 850 C for 40 min
to sinter the gold layer. Each as-sintered substrate was soaked
in an acetone bath for 30 min and then cleaned in DI water for
3
0 min.
The electrode layers were prepared by electrodeposition. A
3.1.2. Composition-induced phase transformation in the Ni–Pt
alloys
reference electrode made of Ag/AgCl (KCl sat’d) was configured
to maintain a standard applied potential. To prevent inhomo-
geneous deposition, a stirring plate was used to agitate all the
deposition solutions. For the pure Pt layer, a solution of 0.01 M
H PtCl ·6H O (dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate (IV) hexahydrate
An alloy that incorporates Ni into a Pt matrix is expected to
exhibit a porous morphology. Fig. 2 shows a series of X-ray diffrac-
tion patterns for the Ni–Pt alloys. The intensities of the Au(1 1 1)
peaks in both pure Ni and pure Pt are smaller than those in Pt61Ni39
,
2
6
2
Pt70Ni30, and Pt82Ni18 because the Au(1 1 1) signal originates from
the sub-layer. A lower Au(1 1 1) intensity reflects a smaller exposed
Au sub-layer area. A small exposed sub-layer area results in a large
exposed deposited layer. We concluded that the porous morpholo-
gies of the alloyed compositions Pt61Ni39, Pt70Ni30, and Pt82Ni18
tended to reflect signals from the substrates.
9
9.9%, UR) was used at an applied potential of −100 mV in a
potentiostat (CHI 824B). For the pure Ni layer, a solution of 1 M
NiCl ·6H O (nickel chloride hexahydrate, SHOWA, 96%) was used
2
2
at an applied potential −800 mV. The deposition rate between Ni
and Pt strongly depends on the applied potential. We therefore
adjusted the alloy composition by increasing the deposition rate
of Ni and reducing the deposition rate of Pt. The distinct applied
potentials were applied to differentiate the composition of the
Ni–Pt alloys. A solution of 0.01 M H PtCl ·6H O was blended with
The intermetallic compounds (IMCs) of the Ni–Pt alloys exerted
critical effects on the microstructural variations of the electrodes.
Fig. 2 shows that a Pt(1 1 1) peak was present for all compositions
except pure Ni. Pure Ni does not show this peak, but materials with
some Pt show a peak proportional to the amount of Pt. This result
indicates that the Pt component enhanced the Pt(1 1 1) preferred
orientation. Only pure Ni displayed the Ni(2 0 0) peak. This result
suggests that the Ni lattice was reconstructed as soon as Pt atoms
infiltrated the Ni matrix. We further confirmed the result that only
two IMCs, Ni Pt and NiPt , contributed to the intermediate com-
2
6
2
a solution of 1 M NiCl ·6H O, and potentials of −200 mV, −400 mV,
2
2
and −600 mV were applied. All depositions were performed for
1
0 min.
2.2. Instruments for the investigation of the electrode
3
3
positions Pt61Ni39, Pt70Ni30, and Pt82Ni18; details are provided in
Appendix A.
The morphology of each electrode was investigated with a
scanning electron microscope (Hitachi 3000-H). Electrode com-
positions were measured with an energy-dispersive spectrum
analyzer (Noran Voyager 2.0). The crystallization of the Ni–Pt alloys
was measured with a thin-film X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (Bruker
D8-SSS).
3
3
.2. The electrochemical reaction on the electrode
.2.1. Cyclic voltammetry
The results of the cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests were compli-
cated by faradic and non-faradic currents that contributed to the
peak shifts in this study. The following paragraphs describe the
results of CV tests on the Pt, Ni–Pt and Ni electrodes with both
2.3. Preparation of the test solution
blank and H A-containing solutions.
The Pt electrode was found to be sensitive to ascorbic acid.
The CV measurement of Pt subjected to H A is shown in Fig. 3.
In the blank solution, the response current in the forward scan
increased appreciably at −0.68 V and −0.62 V, as shown by the
dashed line. The first peak was related to the desorption pro-
cess for the weakly bound hydrogen ions on the electrode; the
second peak showed the desorption process for hydrogen atoms
strongly bound to platinum [18]. Pitara and co-workers investi-
gated the preferred orientations of the adatom peaks; they found
2
Ascorbic acid (C H O , l-(+)-ascorbic acid 99%, Acros) was
diluted to serve as a stock solution for the subsequent blend-
ing. The alkaline test solution was a blank solvent that contained
6
8
6
2
0
.1 M KOH (85%, Showa). The interference reagents for the
H A test were anhydrous oxalic acid (99%, H C O , Showa),
2
2
2
4
sucrose (>99.9%, C12H22O11
, Showa), sodium benzoate (99%,
C H5COONa, Showa), l-(+)-tartaric acid (99%, C H O , Showa), d-
6
4
6
6
(
−)-fructose (99%, C H O , Acros), and anhydrous citric acid (99%,
6
12
6
C H (OH)(COOH) , Showa).
3
4
3