Hydrogen Sorption in Pd Clusters
A R T I C L E S
volumetric device (Sievert’s method) equipped with calibrated and
thermostated volumes and pressure gauges. The samples were
enclosed in a stainless steel sample holder closed with a metal seal.
Before any sorption measurements, the samples were outgassed
under primary vacuum at 473 K for 10 h. The sample holder is
immersed in a liquid N2 Dewar at 77 K or in a thermostated water
bath maintained at 298 K, and high purity hydrogen (6 N) is
introduced step by step up to 9 MPa. The pressure variations due
to both gas cooling and hydrogen sorption are measured after
reaching thermodynamic equilibrium, usually in the range of
minutes. The real equation of state for hydrogen gas was used from
the program GASPAK V3.32.15 The PCI curves were measured
twice (i.e., two full adsorption-desorption cycles) to check the
hysteresis effect and the measurement repeatability. One additional
PCI curve at room temperature and H2 pressure up to 0.4 MPa has
been measured with the help of an automated volumetric instrument
(PCTPro) to confirm the manually recorded isotherm for CT/nPd.
Good agreement is noticed between the two types of measurements.
All capacities reported here in wt % are determined with respect
to the hydrogen loaded material after correction of the sample
weight loss by outgassing. Sample volume correction is derived
from density measurement obtained with a helium AccuPyc 1330
Micromeritics pycnometer. By use of this method, the measured
diffraction, and X-ray absorption experiments have been
performed to characterize the hydrogen sorption properties of
the hybrid material. A thorough comparison between the
hydrogen sorption properties of the hybrid material, the carbon
precursor, and bulk Pd will be addressed and will clarify the
size dependent properties of the Pd clusters.
Experimental Details
The carbon template (CT) was obtained by a replica method of
the SBA-15 silica, as described elsewhere.9-11 The SBA-15 silica
was prepared according to the synthesis procedure already presented
in the literature.12 It displays cylindrical pores with a diameter close
to 5 nm and a mean wall width of ∼4 nm. Carbon was deposited
into the SBA-15 porosity by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of
a mixture of 3 vol % of propylene and argon at 1023 K. The total
amount of carbon introduced in the SBA-15 porosity is 37 wt %.
To remove the silica template, the mixed material (silica/carbon)
was stirred for 4 h in a HF solution (40% volume concentration)
before being filtered and washed with distilled water and finally
dried at 80 °C overnight. The as-synthesized CT displays a
hexagonal arrangement of carbon nanorods (4.5 nm) and a very
well organized mesoporosity. The total mesoporous volume is 1.1
m3/g with a narrow pore size distribution of around 5 nm.
densities of CT and CT/nPd are 1.8 ( 0.2 and 2.5 ( 0.1 g cm-3
,
respectively.
To generate in situ Pd nanoparticles (nPd) into the CT porosity,
a chemical wetting procedure was used, as described elsewhere.13,14
A solution of tetrachloropalladous acid (H2PdCl4) was prepared by
mixing 0.3353 g of PdCl2 (Alfa Caesar, purity 99.9%) into 20 mL
of 10% vol HCl aqueous solution under stirring at 300 K until
complete dissolution. The CT in powder form was then impregnated
twice with the tetrachloropalladinic acid solution for a final Pd
concentration of around 20 wt %. The mixture of powder and
The local structure of the nPd was investigated by X-ray
absorption spectroscopy (XAS) in transmission mode on SAMBA
beamline at the SOLEIL synchrotron. The X-ray absorption spectra
at the K edge of Pd were measured under vacuum at 77 and 298 K
and under hydrogen atmosphere (80 kPa) at 298 K. Bulk Pd powder
(<100 µm) was also measured under similar conditions and used
as reference. The powder samples were mixed with a polymer
(PTFE) to ensure the mechanical cohesion. The measurements were
performed in a special cell connected to a gas sorption device that
allows careful control of the hydrogen pressure.16 The XAS data
treatment and the EXAFS modeling and fit were performed by the
help of the MAX program package.17 The FEFF8 program was
used to obtain the theoretical phase shifts and amplitudes of the
Pd-Pd(O) shells.18 The photoelectron mean free path was deter-
mined empirically. The refined parameters are the coordination
number (N), the Debye-Waller factor (σ2), the distance between
the shells (R), and the energy shift (∆E0). A single Pd-Pd shell
model was successfully used for almost all spectra, excluding the
nPd under vacuum at 298 K, where a two-shell (Pd-O and Pd-Pd)
model has to be taken into account because of the presence of
oxygen. The energy shift ∆E0 was close to zero for all refinements.
2-
solution was stirred for 3 h and dried in air at 330 K. The PdCl4
ions were reduced by heating the impregnated CT in a Ar/H2 flow
(0.5 L min-1) at 573 K for 6 h. The sample was then outgassed
under secondary vacuum for 11 h at 573 K.
The chemical composition of the impregnated material has been
determined by an inductively coupled plasma optical emission
spectrometer (ICP-OES). The measured Pd content is 17.2 wt %,
close to the nominal composition. The hybrid material will further
be named CT/nPd.
Microstructural analyses were performed by transmission electron
microscopy (TEM-Tecnai F20 with a field emission gun of 200
kV, punctual resolution of 0.24 nm, and energy filtering GIF), and
the chemical composition was determined by energy dispersion
spectroscopy (EDS).
Neutron powder diffraction (NPD) experiments were performed
on D1B instrument at the Institute Laue Langevin. This instrument
can provide high neutron flux with a wavelength of 2.52 Å and is
suitable for in situ study under different gas pressure and temper-
ature conditions. In situ neutron diffraction was measured during
the thermal D2 desorption with the help of a special sample holder.
The silica sample holder can be used in a wide range of temperature
and pressure conditions. Deuterium isotope has been chosen instead
of hydrogen because of its lower incoherent scattering cross section.
Bulk Pd powder and pristine CT were also measured under
comparable gas pressure and temperature conditions and used as
references. The thermal desorption spectra (TDS) were recorded
simultaneously to neutron diffraction patterns as the total pressure
under dynamic high vacuum while applying a constant temperature
The textural properties were determined from nitrogen adsorp-
tion/desorption isotherms measured with a Micromeritics ASAP
2020 instrument. The specific surface area was obtained by the
Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. The total pore volume
was computed from the amount of gas adsorbed at p/p0 ) 0.99,
and the micropores volume was calculated using the Dubinin-
Radushkevich equation in the relative pressure range 10-4-10-2
.
Structural characterizations were performed by X-ray diffraction
(XRD) using a Bruker D8 Advance instrument (Cu KR, Bragg-
Brentano geometry). To characterize the crystallographic changes
induced by hydrogen absorption in CT/nPd, in situ XRD measure-
ments were performed by stepwise increase of hydrogen pressures
at ambient temperature. The sample was initially evacuated under
primary vacuum, and hydrogen pressure was incremented to 10
kPa. As reference, in situ XRD measurements have been performed
on bulk Pd (bPd) powder (<100 µm) under comparable conditions.
Hydrogen sorption properties were determined by measuring the
pressure-composition isotherms (PCI) at 77 and 298 K to 9 MPa
hydrogen pressure. The PCI curves were recorded using a manual
(15) Lemmon, E. W.; Peskin, A. P.; McLinden, M. O.; Friend, D. G.
NIST12 Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of Pure Fluids,
version 5.0; NIST: Gaithersburg, MD, 2000.
(16) Paul-Boncour, V.; Joubert, J.-M.; Latroche, M.; Percheron-Gue´gan,
A. J. Alloys Compd. 2002, 330-332, 246.
(17) Michalowicz, A.; Moscovici, J.; Muller-Bouvet, D.; Provost, K. J.
Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2009, 190, 012034.
(14) Campesi, R.; Cuevas, F.; Leroy, E.; Hirscher, M.; Gadiou, R.; Vix-
Guterl, C.; Latroche, M. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 117,
511.
(18) Ankudinov, A. L.; Ravel, B.; Rehr, J. J.; Conradson, S. D. Phys. ReV.
B 1998, 58, 7565.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 22, 2010 7721