Communications
mediator strategy that includes nPt as well as M. These two
mediators are reduced to nPt-Hads and Mred1 at ꢀ0.8 V. nPt-
Hads returns to nPt by donating a proton to Mred1 and an
electron to Mox or NAD+.
Figure 2a and b shows the change of voltammetric
features before and after the addition of nPt to the single-
mediator systems (M or M + NAD+). The reduction potential
Figure 1. a) Cyclic voltammograms of M (500 mm) in phosphate buffer
(100 mm) at pH8.2. Scan rates are indicated in mVs ꢀ1. b) Scan rate
dependency of cathodic and anodic peak currents obtained from (a).
Slopes of the lines were estimated at 0.5.
less than 100 mVsꢀ1. At slow anodic potential sweep, the
C step proceeds faster than the E step so that there is no
chance for Mred1 to donate electrons to the electrode. In fast
scans (rate above 500 mVsꢀ1), however, Mred1 is electro-
chemically oxidized to Mox before the C step proceeds, as the
electron-transfer rate between Mred1 and electrodes is con-
trolled by the scan rate and is faster than the rate of the
chemical reaction.
The anodic peak current ip followed the dependency on
scan rate of conventional faradaic processes (ip / [scan
rate]0.5) only at scan rates higher than 500 mVsꢀ1, which
indicates that Mred1 was totally converted to Mox by the E step
(Figure 1b). The peak currents at scan rates less than
500 mVsꢀ1 deviated from the extrapolated lines fitting peak
currents at the three largest scan rates, because Mred1 was
partly converted to Mred2 by the C step. Therefore, the kinetics
of proton uptake in the C step should be enhanced to achieve
efficient formation of Mred2, which is active for NADH
generation.
Platinum has been extensively used to reduce protons in
electrolytes to hydrogen (hydrogen evolution reaction, HER)
and also to oxidize hydrogen to protons in fuel cells.[10,11] The
main reason that makes the platinum catalyst superior to
other alternative metals is that protons are adsorbed onto
platinum atoms. The intermediate state Pt-Hads makes the H+/
H2 reaction kinetically more favorable, which results in a
decrease of overpotential.
Metal–Hads species, including Pt-Hads, were reported to be
able to function as a reducing agent for organic molecules,
markedly in their nanoparticulate form. Platinum nanopar-
ticles with adsorbed hydrogen atoms (nPt-Hads) were used to
reduce the lucigenin cation to its monocation radical in the
potential range of the HER.[12] Also, other metal nano-
particle–Hads species were reported to work as a reducing
agent:[13,14] nAg-Hads to reduce CH2Cl2 to CH3Cl or Tl+ to Tl0;
nPd-Hads to reduce Pt4+ or Pt2+ into Pt0.
Based on an understanding of the intermediate Pt-Hads, we
added nPt to the single-mediator strategy of M + NAD+. nPt
was introduced to play two functional roles in our tandem
strategy: 1) the homogeneous catalyst responsible for cata-
lyzing the proton uptake reaction of Mred1 to Mred2, and 2) the
secondary mediator to shuttle electrons from electrodes to
Mox. Scheme 2 shows the working mechanism of our tandem-
Figure 2. a,b) Cyclic voltammograms of solutions of a) M and
b) nPt+M in the absence and presence of NAD+. nPt (0.6 mm), M
(0.5 mm), and NAD+ (0.5 mm) were used in phosphate buffer
(100 mm) at pH7.0. GC electrodes were used as working electrodes.
The potential was scanned at 100 mVsꢀ1. Inset in (b): transmission
electron microscopy image of nPt. c,d) Conversion rates at ꢀ0.8 V of
c) NAD+ to NADHin the absence and presence of nPt and d) nPt to
nPt-Hads in the absence and presence of NAD+. The rates (=Di/nFA;
n=number of electrons, F=Faradaic constant, A=electrode area)
were calculated from the difference of the cathodic currents at ꢀ0.8 V
(in a,b) between M+NAD+ and M for “ꢀnPt” in (c); between
nPt+M+NAD+ and nPt+M for “+nPt” in (c); between nPt+M and
M for “ꢀNAD+” in (d); and between nPt+M+NAD+ and M+NAD+
for “+NAD+” in (d).
at the cathodic peak current (Epc) of M was estimated at
ꢀ0.7 V in the absence or presence of NAD+ (Figure 2a).
After addition of nPt, the cyclic voltammograms were totally
changed. The cathodic and anodic waves shown in Figure 2b
arise mostly from adsorption and desorption of protons on
nPt with Epc = ꢀ0.85 to ꢀ0.9 V and the oxidation potential at
the anodic peak current Epa = ꢀ0.52 V.[10]
The conversion rates of NAD+ to NADH (Figure 2c) or
nPt to nPt-Hads (Figure 2d) on electrodes were calculated
from the difference of cathodic currents at ꢀ0.8 V (the
working potential used to generate NADH). The addition of
nPt enhanced the rate of NADH generation 25 times (rate
difference = 3.82 nmolsꢀ1 cmꢀ2). Also, the rate of nPt reduc-
tion on electrodes increased 25% in the presence of NAD+
when compared with that in the absence of NAD+ (rate
difference = 7.64 nmolsꢀ1 cmꢀ2).
The amount of NADH was measured spectroscopically at
ꢀ0.8 V in the absence or presence of various concentrations
of nPt. The amount increased with nPt concentration and
1750
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1749 –1752