Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 85, No. 6, 9 August 2004
Baumer et al.
945
line core to the surrounding oxide, E -centers and
Ј
EX-centers located in the oxide. For the EX-centers, the two
characteristic hyperfine lines were detected. A total spin den-
sity of 1.5ϫ1018 cm−3 was found for the as-grown SiNWs.
After HF etching, the spin density was reduced by a factor of
50. PDS measurements of the as-grown and H-terminated
SiNWs showed that the optical absorption properties of the
nanowires above photon energies of 1.5 eV are essentially
identical to those of microcrystalline Si. In addition, the PDS
experiments confirmed the decrease in defect density after
HF etching.
The work done in Germany was supported by the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through SFB 563, while
that in China was supported by the Research Grants Council
of Hong Kong SAR (CAV project City U 3/01C) and by a
grant from the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
FIG. 3. Optical absorption coefficient of as-grown and H-terminated SiNWs
determined by PDS plotted as a function of the incident photon energy. As a
reference, the absorption spectrum of microcrystalline Si (Ref. 27) is
included.
as-grown samples, because both types of defects should not
be affected by the HF treatment.
1Y. Cui, Z. Zhong, D. Wang, W. U. Wang, and C. M. Lieber, Nano Lett. 3,
149 (2003).
Electronically active defects also influence the optical
absorption properties. The fact that SiNWs do not form
densely packed thin films impedes the determination of the
absorption via classical transmission measurements. Rather,
experimental techniques such as photothermal deflection are
needed to directly detect the absorption of the samples. Fig-
ure 3 shows the optical absorption coefficient obtained from
such PDS experiments as a function of the incident photon
energy. The experimental data were aligned to the maximal
absorption, correcting for different layer thicknesses. For en-
ergies above Ϸ1.5 eV, the absorption spectra of as-grown
and H-terminated SiNWs agree within the experimental er-
rors with the absorption spectrum of microcrystalline silicon.
At 3.3 eV, the E1 maximum of the absorption is found,
which is due to direct optical transitions in crystalline Si. For
energies above E1, the absorption coefficient of the SiNWs
seems to decrease again. However, this is an experimental
artifact since at very strong absorption the incident light is no
longer absorbed by the whole SiNW layer. For energies be-
low the indirect band gap ͑Ϸ1.1 eV͒, absorption is caused by
defects. As expected from the ESR spin densities reported
above, the absorption of the as-grown SiNWs below
Ϸ1.5 eV is considerably higher than the absorption of the
H-terminated SiNWs indicating a difference in defect density
of about a factor of 30. The inhomogenity of the deposited
SiNW layers as well as the lack of adequate calibration data
impedes an absolute quantification of the defect densities via
PDS at this position. Nevertheless, the relative decrease in
defect density by the HF treatment observed in ESR is con-
firmed by PDS.
2X. Duan, Y. Huang, R. Agarwal, and C. M. Lieber, Nature (London) 421,
241 (2003).
3X. T. Zhou, J. Q. Hu, C. P. Li, D. D. D. Ma, C. S. Lee, and S. T. Lee,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 369, 220 (2003).
4Y. Cui, Q. Wei, H. Park, and C. M. Lieber, Science 293, 1289 (2001).
5A. M. Morales and C. M. Lieber, Science 279, 208 (1998).
6Y. Cui, L. J. Lauhon, M. S. Gudiksen, J. Wang, and C. M. Lieber, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 78, 2214 (2001).
7N. Wang, Y. H. Tang, Y. F. Zhang, C. S. Lee, I. Bello, and S. T. Lee,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 299, 237 (1999).
8R. Q. Zhang, Y. Lifshitz, and S. T. Lee, Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 15,
636 (2003).
9Y. Cui, X. Duan, J. Hu, and C. M. Lieber, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 5213
(2000).
10X. H. Sun, S. D. Wang, N. B. Wong, D. D. D. Ma, S. T. Lee, and B. K.
Teo, Inorg. Chem. 42, 2398 (2003).
11D. D. D. Ma, C. S. Lee, F. C. K. Au, S. Y. Tong, and S. T. Lee, Science
299, 1874 (2003).
12W. S. Shi, H. Y. Peng, Y. F. Zheng, N. Wang, N. G. Shang, Z. W. Pan, C.
S. Lee, and S. T. Lee, Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 12, 1343 (2000).
13A. C. Boccara, D. Fournier, and J. Badoz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 130
(1980).
14F. L. Galeener, Phys. Rev. B 19, 4292 (1979).
15F. L. Galeener and P. N. Sen, Phys. Rev. B 17, 1928 (1978).
16G. J. Pietsch, G. S. Higashi, and Y. J. Chabal, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 3115
(1994).
17E. H. Poindexter, P. J. Caplan, B. E. Deal, and R. R. Razouk, J. Appl.
Phys. 52, 879 (1981).
18M. Stutzmann and D. K. Biegelsen, Phys. Rev. B 40, 9834 (1989).
19J. L. Cantin and H. J. von Bardeleben, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 303, 175
(2002).
20R. A. Weeks, J. Appl. Phys. 27, 1376 (1956).
21A. Stesmans, Phys. Rev. B 45, 9501 (1992).
22A. Stesmans and F. Scheerlinck, Phys. Rev. B 50, 5204 (1994).
23W. E. Carlos and S. M. Prokes, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 2129 (1995).
24M. Dohi, H. Yamatani, and T. Fujita, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 815 (2002).
25H. Kusumoto and M. Shoji, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 17, 1678 (1962).
26A. Stesmans and F. Scheerlinck, J. Appl. Phys. 75, 1047 (1994).
27M. Stutzmann, in Handbook on Semiconductors, edited by T. S. Moss,
(Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994), Vol. 3, p. 657.
To summarize, we have shown H termination of SiNWs
by FTIR measurements after the removal of the as-grown
oxide layer by HF etching. ESR measurements on the
as-grown SiNWs revealed several paramagnetic defects:
Dangling bonds or Pb-centers at the interface of the crystal-
216.165.95.79 On: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 05:37:08