1740
GOLIKOV et al.
Stability constants of silver(I) with 18C6 in AN–DMSO sol-
stable solvates between the solvent and ligand mole-
cules, which is favored by the linear conformation of
strongly polar AN molecules and the optimal distances
between the donor atoms of the crown ether [8–10].
Addition of dimethyl sulfoxide destabilizes the solva-
tion shell of the ligand, favoring an increase in the sta-
bility of [Ag18C6]+. However, the Ag+ ion is stabilized
with increasing DMSO content in the binary solvent,
which is due to the formation of rather stable solvates
of silver(I) with DMSO [11, 12]. Therefore, the overall
increase in the stability of the complex ions is not so
significant as expected from the change in the solvate
state of the ligand.
vents at 298.15 K and I = 0.1 mol/L (NaClO4)
xDMSO, mole fraction
logK°
0
0.42 0.05
0.54 0.10
0.63 0.08
0.66 0.08
0.67 0.08
0.74 0.02
0.76 0.02
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
The performance ability of the electrode system was
verified by calibrating it in each composition of the
AN–DMSO mixed solvent.
REFERENCES
1. M. Ignaczak and A. Grzejdziak, Monatsh. Chem. 115,
943 (1984).
2. A. M.Yampol’skii and V. A. Il’in (Mashinostroenie, Lenin-
grad, 1981) [in Russian].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3. A. Cassol, P. Pi Bernardo, and P. Zanonato, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 657 (1987).
In the mixed nonaqueous solvent studied system,
the stability of Ag+ complexes with 18-crown-6 ether
increases insignificantly on going from AN to DMSO.
The difference between the logK° values reaches
~0.34 while the DMSO mole fraction in the mixture
ranges from 0.0 to 1.0 (see table). The errors in logK°
are represented as standard root-mean-square devia-
tions taking into account the Student test [6, 7] with a
confidence probability of 0.95 for a set of experiments
in each molar fraction of the mixed solvent, which was
calculated by the formula
4. J. F. Coetzee, Anal. Chem. 34, 1139 (1962).
5. Handbook of Electrode Technology (Orion Research,
Cambridge (USA), 1982; Mir, Moscow, 1986).
6. D. Skoog and D. West, Fundamentals of Analytical
Chemistry (Holt, Rinehart, Winston, New York, 1976;
Mir, Moscow, 1979), Vol. 1.
7. K. Doerffel, Statistik in der analytischen Chemie ( Deut-
scher Verlag fuer Grundstoffindustrie, Leipzig, 1990;
Mir, Moscow, 1994).
8. R. L. Garrel, J. C. Smyth, F. R. Fronczek, et al., J. Inclu-
sion Phen. 6, 73 (1988).
9. P. D. J. Grootenhuis and P. A. Koolman, J. Am. Chem.
Σ(n – ni)2
δ = t -----------------------,
i(i – 1)
Soc. 111 (24), 4046 (1989).
10. R. Fush, G.E. McGrary, and J. L. Blumfield, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 83, 4281 (1961).
11. I. A. Kuz’mina and V. A. Shormanov, Izv. Vyssh.
Uchebn. Zaved., Khim. Khim. Tekhnol. 43 (4), 71
(2000).
12. I. A. Kuz’mina and V. A. Shormanov, Izv. Vyssh.
Uchebn. Zaved., Khim. Khim. Tekhnol. 43 (5), 138
(2000).
where t is the Student coefficient, n is the mean value,
ni is the current value, and i is the number of experi-
ments in the set.
Presumably, a decrease in the stability of the com-
plex in AN is predominantly due to the formation of
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 52 No. 11 2007