4
2
Z. Zhong et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 330 (2000) 41±47
even the same carbon product can possess various
structure and shape. For example, the SWNTs
have theoretically three conformations, namely
armchair, zig-zag and chiral, and a particular
carbon nanotube can further exhibit various
shapes in straight, curved, helical and planarspiral
eter of 1.5 cm, and prior to the reaction, the cat-
alyst was pre-reduced at 700°C for 40 min in the
¯ow of hydrogen. The reaction was then con-
ducted at 600°C for 1 h in the ¯ow of CH
4
with a
¯ow-rate of 30 ml/min. After reaction, the mixture
was cooled in hydrogen and subjected to treatment
with concentrated sulfuric acid to dissolve metallic
catalyst. The microstructure and the morphology
of the carbon product were observed by low and
high resolution transmission electron microscope
(TEM and HRTEM) on a JEM-100CX and a
Philips FEG CM300 electron microscope, respec-
tively, and SEM and EDX measurements were
carried out on a XL-FEG scanning electron mi-
croscopy. Magnetic measurements were carried
out using a superconducting vibration sample
magnetometer (Oxford Instruments) at room
temperature. The saturation magnetization was
measured at the maximum ®eld of 3 T. Prior to the
magnetic measurement, the powder was shaped
into small pellet.
[
11,18,19]. So we believe the carbon production
reaction should be an ideal model catalytic reac-
tion to study the relationship between the nature
of the catalysts, reaction kinetics and the struc-
tures as well as the morphologies of carbon
products. However, we have found that, though
several reaction models have been proposed
[
11,20±22], the catalytic mechanism and reaction
kinetics are still not very clear, and in most cases,
the control of the composition and structure of
carbon product still poses a big challenge. Our
strategy is to study systematically the nature of
catalyst and the carbon product formation mech-
anism, and if possible, to develop technologies to
control the structure and morphology of carbon
products. Here we demonstrate a simple catalytic
approach to the growth of carbon nanoballs under
controlled conditions.
3. Results and discussion
Table 1 lists the composition of catalysts, cat-
alytic reaction conditions and reaction results.
Figs. 1±3 show some of TEM and SEM images of
carbon products. We found that typical MWNTs
were obtained from the decomposition of methane
on Ni/MgO catalyst (Fig. 1a). These carbon tubes
are slightly curved in shape and have a hollow
structure inside. The diameters of tubes range
from 10 to 40 nm. In the carbon product produced
from NiCo/MgO catalyst, we observed few ring-
like carbon balls besides the curved MWNTs. We
guessed that the growth of carbon nanoballs
should be related to the existence of Co sites in the
catalyst, because we did not observe similar
structure in the carbon product from Ni/MgO
catalyst. The guess was soon con®rmed from our
experiments. Fig. 1b shows a TEM image of car-
bon product from Co/MgO catalyst. It is clearly
seen that most of the carbon products are carbon
ring-like nanoballs. The diameters of these carbon
nanoballs range from 50 to 200 nm. We have also
found that by simply increasing the content of
supported cobalt from 50 to 75 mol% in Co/MgO
2
. Experimental
The preparation of catalysts was carried out
according to the method described in literature
23]. For example, 2.91 g of nitrate salt of cobalt
[
was mixed with 2.56 g of magnesium nitrate (50
mol% Co/MgO) and dissolved in distilled water,
followed by addition of citric acid with a molar
ratio of citric acid: metal ions 1:1. The aqueous
solution was gelled at 60±70°C with stirring and
dried at 200°C for 1 h. The dried powder was
further heated in air at 400°C for 1 h, and 700°C
for 5 h. For comparison, pure MgO and Co
powder, which were prepared according to the
above procedures using their nitrate as precursors,
were also used as catalysts, respectively, and
several catalysts were calcined at 900°C for 2 h.
All the above chemicals were from Aldrich and in
AR grade.
The catalytic conditions were studied very
carefully. For a typical catalytic reaction, 0.20 g of
catalyst was loaded in a quartz tube with a diam-