072508-3
Darques et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 072508 ͑2005͒
responds closely to the earlier mentioned upper bound. Such
large values are consistent with the very good structural
quality demonstrated by our TEM studies. In contrast, values
for HU are well below the maximum expected value when
the c axis is parallel to the wires. Furthermore, a gradual
decrease of HU with increasing pH clearly appears. This be-
havior can be associated to the influence on crystalline
growth by adsorbed hydrolysis products ͑such as Co hydrox-
ides͒ at the cathode when the pH is sufficiently high. Another
possible reason for the reduction of HU are stacking faults,
which might increase in number in the high pH samples.14
However, further structural characterization is required to
provide a better understanding on the relation between the
growth, crystalline structure and the value of the magneto-
crystalline anisotropy field.
In conclusion, the crucial role of the deposition current
on the preferential orientation of the hcp c axis in Co nanow-
ires with respect to the wire axis has been shown. In particu-
lar, both structural phases, hcp Co with the c axis parallel
and the c axis perpendicular to the wires, can be obtained
from a single electrolyte by changing the deposition current
in a limited pH range ͑5.0–5.5͒ by one order of magnitude.
This reorientation of the c axis leads to changes in sign of the
crystalline anisotropy field. This allows not only to chose the
desired orientation of the c axis, but also to simply grow
wires in which both phases are alternated, providing a simple
and convenient way to control the magnetic properties of
electrodeposited cobalt nanowire arrays to a large extent.
The authors would like to thank R. Legras and E. Ferain
for providing the polycarbonate membrane samples used in
this study, Th. Fournier for fabrication of Si/SiN membranes
used in the TEM experiments, and Dr. L. Vila for his valu-
able help in the experiment. This work was supported in part
by the European Program Contract No.: HPRN CT1999
00150 as well as by the Belgian Science Policy through the
Interuniversity Attraction Pole Program PAI ͑5/1/1͒. One of
the authors ͑A.E.͒ thanks CONACyT for financial support
through Grant No. J-40426.
FIG. 3. TEM bright field images and corresponding diffraction patterns of
two 30 nm Co nanowires electrodeposited at pH=5.2 and current densities
of ͑a͒ 5 and ͑b͒ 50 mA/cm2.
differ, but these values are consistent with a c axis oriented
perpendicular to the wire axis.
1J. L. Maurice, D. Imhoff, P. Etienne, O. Durand, S. Dubois, L. Piraux,
J.-M. George, P. Galtier, and A. Fert, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 184, 1
͑1998͒.
The dependence of the hcp c-axis orientation on the
deposition current is corroborated by TEM investigations as
shown in Figs. 3͑a͒ and 3͑b͒ for Co wires deposited at a pH
of 5.2. In the case of low current density ͓Fig. 3͑a͔͒, the TEM
bright field and diffraction images clearly show an orienta-
tion of the c axis oriented parallel to the wire axis ͑+/−5°͒.
Similarly, in the case of high current density ͓Fig. 3͑b͔͒, the
TEM bright field and diffraction images clearly show an ori-
entation of the c axis oriented perpendicular to the wire axis
͑+/−5°͒. Although only short sections are shown in the im-
ages, no grain boundaries were observed along longer sec-
tions of the ten wires that have been examined in detail.
As pointed out in previous works involving electroplated
Co films, these structural changes can be attributed to the
influence of absorbed hydrolysis products at the cathode as
well as to evolution of hydrogen, which are known to depend
on the pH and the plating current.9,12 For bulk hcp Co, the
magnetocrystalline anisotropy has an upper bound of
7.8 kOe13 ͑K=5.3ϫ106 erg/cm3 and HU=2K/MS͒. It is
noted that for perpendicularly oriented c axis, the maximum
crystal anisotropy field found in this study ͑ϳ7.8 kOe͒ cor-
2R. M. Metzger, V. V. Konovalov, M. Sun, T. Xu, G. Zangari, B. Xu, M.
Benakli, and W. D. Doyle, IEEE Trans. Magn. 36, 30 ͑2000͒.
3V. Scarani, B. Doudin, and J.-P. Ansermet, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 205,
241 ͑1999͒.
4G. J. Strijkers, J. H. J. Dalderop, M. A. A. Broeksteed, H. J. M. Swagten,
and W. J. M. de Jonge, J. Appl. Phys. 86, 5141 ͑1999͒.
5M. Kröll, W. J. Blau, D. Grandjean, R. E. Benfield, F. Luis, P. M. Paulus,
and L. J. de Jongh, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 249, 241 ͑2002͒.
6S. Nakahara and S. Mahajan, J. Electrochem. Soc. 127, 283 ͑1980͒.
7T. A. Tochitskii, A. V. Boltushkin, and V. G. Shadrov, Russ. J. Electro-
chem. 31, 178 ͑1995͒.
8I. M. Croll, IEEE Trans. Magn. 23, 59 ͑1987͒.
9T. Chen and P. Cavallotti, Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 205 ͑1982͒.
10M. Darques, A. Encinas, L. Vila, and L. Piraux, J. Phys. D 37, 1411
͑2004͒.
11In a first fit, Hu was obtained using Eq. ͑1͒. When Hu turned out to be
negative, the fit was repeated using Eq. ͑2͒.
12T. Cohen-Hyams, W. D. Kaplan, and J. Yahalom, Electrochem. Solid-State
Lett. 5, C75 ͑2002͒.
13E. Du Tremolet de Lacheisserie, in Magnétisme, edited by J. Bornarel
͑Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, Grenoble, 1999͒, p. 168.
14B. Bian, W. Yang, D. Laughlin, and D. Lambeth, IEEE Trans. Magn. 37,
1456 ͑2001͒.