in single quantum dots similar to what was reported for the
luminescence in the InAs systems.16 However, we believe
that this is extremely unlikely in our case, since in our
samples these peaks always appear in the same position. As
a consequence, a very narrow distribution of islands with a
preferential size would be necessary to sustain such a hy-
pothesis, a narrow distribution which we do not observe.
In summary, we have shown the possibility to realize
quantum confinement conditions in uncapped 2D and 3D
Ge/Si structures. In the latter case the PL measurements evi-
dence quantum confinement effects even for clusters much
larger than the Bohr exciton radius. Our results suggest that
the 3D cluster shape plays an important role to determine the
quantum confinement conditions.
FIG. 3. PL spectrum of a VW type sample measured at 10 K.
of the capped sample support the explanation of the PL band
in terms of quantum confined systems. Indeed, in the capped
sample the band is centered at lower energy ͑780 meV͒ with
a FWHM equal to ϳ65 meV. This red shift can be accounted
for by the smaller confining potential of the capping Si as
compared to that of the oxide. Moreover, since in a shal-
lower confining potential the eigenvalues are less sensitive to
the well dimensions, the dimension fluctuations of the re-
combination regions on the island top are less effective
hence, the narrowing of the band in the capped sample.
The third sample series was obtained by increasing the
deposition temperature above 700 °C. In this regime the is-
lands were distributed according to two coexisting distribu-
tions: the first consisting of large and steep islands and the
second formed by very small islands having typical sizes of
10 nm. These small islands are regarded as the growth
precursors.15 As inferred by a close scrutiny of the LFM
images, these small clusters do not seem to be connected by
a Ge wetting layer to the larger islands. Therefore, we con-
cluded that the samples were of the Volmer–Weber ͑VW͒
type. The PL spectra of this series show the two bands re-
ported in Fig. 3. The first PL band is centered around 800
meV and is practically identical to the emission observed in
the SK type samples. Similarly, to the SK case it can be
attributed to the emission from the top regions of the large
islands. The second PL band is centered at higher energy
around 970 meV. It would be tempting to relate it to the PL
emission originated in the small islands acting as growth
precursors. However, further work is needed in order to
check this hypothesis. Finally, we want to indicate that in
some samples we observed the appearance of narrow lines
͑FWHMϷ2 meV, see Fig. 3͒ probably due to transitions of
excitons bounded to impurities. An alternative explanation
could be that these lines are related to transitions occurring
We are grateful to D. Zintu for her assistance during
the experiment and A. Miriametro and R. Moretto for tech-
nical assistance. This work was partially supported by
the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Contract No.
93.01269.CT02. L.D.G. is a recipient of a Postdoctoral Fel-
`
lowship of the Universita di Roma III and G.C. is a recipient
`
of a Doctoral Fellowship of the Universita di Tor Vergata,
Roma.
1 F. Capasso and S. Datta, Phys. Today 74 ͑1990͒.
2 T. Takahagara and K. Takeda, Phys. Rev. B 46, 15578 ͑1992͒.
3 J. R. Heath, J. J. Shiang, and A. P. Alivisatos, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 1607
͑1994͒.
4 J. Brunner, T. S. Rupp, H. Gossner, R. Ritter, I. Eisele, and G. Abstreiter,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 994 ͑1994͒.
5 N. Usami, T. Mine, S. Fukatsu, and Y. Shiraki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1126
͑1994͒.
6 H. Sunamura, N. Usami, S. Fukatsu, and Y. Shiraki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66,
3025 ͑1995͒.
7
¨
R. Apetz, L. Vescan, A. Hartmann, C. Dieker, and H. Luth, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 66, 445 ͑1995͒.
8 B. Cunningham, J. O. Chu, and S. Akbar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3574
͑1991͒; A. Sakai and T. Tatsumi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 52 ͑1994͒.
9 L. Di Gaspare, G. Capellini, C. Chudoba, M. Sebastiani, and F. Evange-
listi, Appl. Surf. Sci. ͑to be published͒.
10 P. Schittenhelm, M. Gail, J. Brunner, J. F. Nutzel, and G. Abstreiter, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 67, 1292 ͑1995͒.
L. Vescan, K. Schmidt, C. Dieker, H. P. Tang, T. Vescan, and H. Luth,
11
¨
Thin Solid Films 222, 5 ͑1992͒.
12 D. J. Eaglesham, F. C. Unterwald, and D. C. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. Lett.
70, 966 ͑1993͒.
13 J. Brunner, J. Nutzel, M. Gail, U. Menczingar, and G. Abstreiter, J. Vac.
Sci. Technol. B 11, 1097 ͑1993͒.
A. Hartmann, C. Dieker, R. Loo, L. Vescan, H. Luth, and U. Bangert,
14
¨
Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1888 ͑1995͒.
15 Y. W. Mo, D. E. Savage, B. S. Swartzentruber, and M. G. Lagally, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 65, 1020 ͑1990͒.
16
´
¨
J.-Y. Marzin, J.-M. Gerard, A. Izrael, D. Barrier, and G. Bastard, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 73, 716 ͑1994͒.
2984 Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 68, No. 21, 20 May 1996 Palange et al.
On: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:05:28