models. However, for concentrated solutions in the
low-temperature range, vacancies form associates by
the coulombic interactions. Thus, the carrier concen-
tration becomes diminished, and then the conductivity
is decreased with increasing doping concentration. We
cannot discriminate the correct mechanism for this
study, but the data of the conductivity behaviour are
reasonable.
4
. Conclusions
Y O -doped and ZrO thin films were prepared by
ꢀ
ꢁ
ꢀ
the sol—gel process using the dip-coating method. The
following conclusions are drawn.
1
. A uniform thin film was prepared by using zirco-
nium chloride octahydrate and yttrium chloride
hexahydrate as raw materials, with ethylene glycol,
2
-butanol and distilled water as solvents.
2. YZ crystalline films were produced by the ther-
Figure 12 Electrical conductivity of YZ thin film measured at
00°C in air. The specimens heat treated at 1300 °C for 2 h were
used.
6
mal treatment above 600 °C, at which temperature
raw materials were completely decomposed.
3
. In all YZ thin films, the tetragonal phase was
stable at low temperatures as a result of the crystallite
size effect; however, at the higher temperatures the
tetragonal phase was transformed into either the mono-
clinic phase or the cubic phase, depending on the
doping concentration. YZ thin film of 8 mol % Y O
in air. The line is drawn as a guide to the eye.
Logr (S cm\ꢂ) has a maximum value at around
1
0 mol %, and then decreases with increasing yttria
content. It is known that the location of the conductiv-
ity maximum corresponds to the minimum amount of
the dopant required to stabilize fully the fluorite
phase.
The conductivity of YZ thin films prepared in this
study was similar to the values of the sintered body,
the single crystal and the plasma-sprayed films re-
ported by Chiodelli et al. [21].
ꢀ
ꢁ
content was stabilized to almost cubic phase at
000 °C.
. Reasonable conductivity behaviour at YZ was
1
4
observed for the YZ thin films. The electrical conduct-
ivity of YZ thin films was similar to the values of the
sintered body.
According to the general expression r"r exp
ꢄ
(
!*H/R¹), the variations in log r and the activa-
ꢄ
tion energy, *H, with the dopant content were ob-
References
tained from the Arrhenius plots between the conduct-
ivity and the measured temperature. The result is
1. Y. TAKAHASHI, K. NIWA, K. KOBAYASHI and M. MAT-
SUKI, ½ogyo-Kyokai-Shi 95 (1987) 942.
L. YANG and J. CHENG, J. Non-Crystl. Solids 112 (1989)
442.
2
.
characteristic of the tendency for log r to increase
ꢄ
with increasing yttria content. The pre-exponential
3.
K. IZUMI, M. MURAKAMI, T. DEGUCHI and A. MORITA,
J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 72 (1989) 1465.
factor, r , is known to be proportional to the carrier
ꢄ
concentration and a square of the jumping distance. In
4. P. DE LIMA NETO, M. ATIK, L. A. AVACA and M. A.
AEGERTER, J. Sol-Gel Sci. ¹echnol. 2 (1994) 529.
this case, the increase in log r can be approximated
ꢄ
5
6
.
.
R. CARUSO, N. PELLEGRI, O. DE SANCTIS, M. C.
CARACOCHE and P. C. RIVAS, ibid. 3 (1994) 241.
M. ATIK, C. R. KHA, P. DE LIMA NETO, L. A. AVACA,
M. A. AEGERTER and J. ZARZYCKI, J. Mater. Sci. ¸ett. 14
(1995) 178.
to the increase of the carrier concentration, because
the variation in the jumping distance with the yttria
dopant is much smaller than that in the carrier con-
centration.
Therefore, the increase in the conductivity up to the
maximum in the conductivity—dopant concentration
curves of Fig. 12 can be explained by the increase in
the carrier concentration. Many yttrium cations sub-
stitute for Zrꢃ> in the lattice sites and as a result
of their lower valence state, they also create more
vacancies in the oxygen sublattice.
The decrease in conductivity from a maximum
value with increasing yttria content, however, can be
explained in terms of a blocking effect of the larger
cations. The migration of vacancies is more effectively
blocked by larger dopant cations.
The conductivity behaviour in dilute solid solutions
and in the high-temperature range, when vacancies are
free and mobile, is more easily explained by such
7
8
.
.
A. NEGISHI, ½ogyo-Kyokai-Shi 93 (1985) 566.
M. SHANE and M. L. MECARTNEY, J. Mater. Sci. 25 (1990)
1
537.
9
.
R. D. MAGGIO, P. SCARDI and A. TOMASI, Mater. Res.
Soc. Symp. Proc. 180 (1990) 481.
10. P. PESHEV and V. SLAVOVA, Mater. Res. Bull. 27 (1992)
269.
1
1
1. T. W. KUEPER, S. J. VISCO and L. C. DE JONGHE, Solid
State Ionics 52 (1992) 251.
1
2. C. SAKURAI, T. FUKUI and M. OKUYAMA, J. Amer.
Ceram. Soc. 76 (1993) 1061.
13. K. MIYAZAWA, K. SUZUKI and M. Y. WEY, ibid. 78 (1995)
47.
4. U. B. PAL and S. C. SINGHAL, J. Electrochem. Soc. 137
1990) 2937.
5. M. C. CAROLAN and J. N. MICHAELS, Solid State Ionics 37
1990) 189.
16. R. C. GARVIE, J. Phys. Chem. 69 (1965) 1238.
3
1
1
(
(
5255