44
K.A. Pokrovski, A.T. Bell / Journal of Catalysis 244 (2006) 43–51
tion capacity. The authors attributed this latter effect to the for-
mation of Ce3+-O(H)-Zr4+ species by dissociative adsorption
of H2 on particles of supported Cu, followed by spillover of
atomic H onto the oxide surface and its reaction with Ce4+-O-
Zr4+ centers. The authors concluded that the higher concentra-
tion of Ce3+-O(H)-Zr4+ species on the oxide surface, together
with the higher Brønsted acidity of these species, appears to
be the primary cause for the fourfold-higher activity of 3 wt%
Cu/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 relative to 3 wt% Cu/ZrO2.
Table 1
Effect of oxide composition on the surface properties of 3 wt% Cu/
M
Zr
O
0.3 0.7 2
Catalyst
S.A.
H
adsorption
CO adsorption
capacity
(µmol/m )
2
2
capacity
(µmol/m )
(m /g)
2
2
3 wt% Cu/ZrO
3 wt% Cu/Ce Zr
3 wt% Cu/Pr Zr
3 wt% Cu/Mn Zr
123
127
96
0.3
0.50
0.65
0.71
0.67
2
O
1.51
1.42
0.94
0.3 0.7
2
O
0.3 0.7
2
O
160
0.3 0.7
2
The present study was undertaken to examine the influence
of different dopants incorporated into ZrO2 on the catalytic ac-
tivity of 3 wt% Cu/M0.3Zr0.7O2 (M = Ce, Mn, and Pr) for
methanol synthesis from CO/H2. Mixed oxides with the stoi-
chiometry M0.3Zr0.7O2 were prepared by forced hydrolysis at
low pH, and Cu was dispersed on the surface of these materi-
als by deposition–precipitation. These catalysts were character-
ized by XRD, XANES, and temperature-programmed reduction
(TPR) in H2, and the H2 and CO adsorption capacities of each
catalyst were measured by temperature-programmed desorp-
tion (TPD). Steady-state catalytic performance measurements
were made, and transient-response, in situ infrared studies were
conducted to probe the reactivity of adsorbed species.
393 K under vacuum for >2 h. BET surface areas were calcu-
lated using a five-point isotherm. The surface areas measured
after calcination ranged from 96 to 160 m2/g and are reported
in Table 1. Nearly identical values were obtained after the dis-
persion of Cu.
Hydrogen TPR was carried out using 0.15 g of a calcined
sample that had been purged with He at 298 K for 30 min. The
flow was then switched from pure He to a 2% H2/He mixture
flowing at 60 cm3/min, and the temperature of the sample was
ramped at 20 K/min from 298 to 673 K. The consumption of
H2 was monitored using a mass spectrometer (Cirrus, Spectra
Products).
Cu K-edge, Mn K-edge, Ce LIII-edge, and Pr LIII-edge
XANES data were acquired at the Stanford Synchrotron Radi-
ation Laboratory (SSRL) on beamline 2–3. Each sample was
mixed with boron nitride, pressed into a rectangular pellet
(0.43 × 1.86 cm), and then placed in an in situ cell for trans-
mission experiments [10]. A sufficient quantity of each sample
was used to give a calculated absorbance of 2. Each sample
was calcined in 10% O2/He at 573 K for 2 h, then cooled to
298 K, purged with He, and evacuated to 10−6 Torr to remove
residual oxygen. A 2% H2/He mixture was then passed through
the cell at a flow rate of 60 cm3/min. In situ XANES data at
Cu K-edge, Mn K-edge, Ce LIII-edge, and Pr LIII-edge were
acquired while heating each sample in a flow of 2% H2/He
(60 cm3/min) from 298 to 573 K at 4 K/min. XANES analyses
were carried out using the Athena version 0.8.041 software [11,
12]. The energy was calibrated using the Cu K-edge of a Cu foil
(E0 = 8980 eV), the Mn K-edge of a Mn foil (E0 = 6539 eV),
the Ce LIII-edge of CeO2 (E0 = 5728 eV), and the Pr LIII-edge
of Pr(C2H3O2)3 (Pr3+ white line at 5954 eV). Pre-edge absorp-
tions due to the background and detector were subtracted using
a linear fit to the data in the range of −200 to −50 eV relative to
the sample edge energy (E0). Each spectrum was then normal-
ized by a constant determined by the average absorption in the
range of 100–300 eV relative to E0. The edge energy of each
sample and reference were taken at the first inflection point be-
yond any pre-edge peaks.
2. Experimental
2.1. Catalyst preparation
M0.3Zr0.7O2 (M = Ce, Mn, and Pr) was prepared as de-
scribed previously [8,9]. Zirconyl nitrate (ZrO(NO3)2·xH2O,
99.99%, Aldrich), cerium(III) nitrate (Ce(NO3)3·6H2O,
99.999%, Aldrich), manganese(II) nitrate (Mn(NO3)2·xH2O,
99.999%, Alfa Aesar), and praseodymium(III) nitrate (Pr-
(NO3)3·6H2O, 99.99%, Alfa Aesar) were used as precursors.
Appropriate amounts of metal salts were dissolved in deionized
water (0.5 M total metals basis) and boiled under reflux for
240 h. The final solutions had a pH < 1. NH4OH was added
dropwise to agglomerate the resulting fine particles and fa-
cilitate their filtration. The recovered precipitate was washed
with deionized water. The washed solid was then dried in air
overnight at 383 K. Each sample was then calcined at 873 K
in dry air flowing at a rate of 100 cm3/min. The temperature
was ramped from room temperature at a rate of 2 K/min to the
final temperature, which was maintained for 3 h. Copper was
then dispersed onto each support by the method of deposition–
precipitation [6] to obtain a series of 3 wt% Cu/M0.3Zr0.7O2
catalysts.
2.2. Catalyst characterization
The crystallographic phase of M0.3Zr0.7O2 was determined
by X-ray diffraction (XRD). XRD patterns were obtained with
a Siemens D5000 diffractometer using CuKα radiation and a
graphite monochromator. Scans were made in the 2θ range of
20◦–90◦ with a step size of 0.02◦ and a time/step of 11 s.
The BET surface area of each M0.3Zr0.7O2 support was de-
termined using an Autosorb 1 (Quantachrome Instruments) gas
adsorption system. Before each analysis, samples were dried at
H2 and CO adsorption capacities were determined using
TPD. In the case of H2, the sample was calcined and then re-
duced at 573 K in a 2% H2/He mixture flowing at 60 cm3/min.
The sample was then cooled in 2% H2/He to 298 K and
purged in He. Desorption was conducted by ramping the sam-
ple temperature at 20 K/min from 298 to 773 K in flowing
He (60 cm3/min) while monitoring the desorbing gas by mass
spectrometry. To determine the CO adsorption capacity, the