B. E. Blass et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 4629–4632
4631
5. Typical Experimental Procedure: Step 1: 1,2,3-triazole ring
formation: 1,2,3-triazole: 1-(3,4-dimethylphenyl) prop-2-
yn-1-one (1.0 g, 6.3 mmol) was dissolved in 63 ml DMA
and trimethylsilyl azide (0.874 ml, 7.59 mmol, 1.2 equiv)
was added. The reaction mixture was then heated to 110 °C
and monitored for loss of the alkyne. When the starting
alkyne was consumed, the reaction mixture was cooled to
room temperature and the solvent was removed under
reduced pressure. The residual material was then purified via
normal phase chromatography with a hexane and ethyl
acetate gradient to yield 865 mg (68%) of the desired product.
Step 2: Alkylation of the 1,2,3-triaozles: (3,4-dimethylphe-
nyl)(2H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methanone (1.0 g, 4.97 mmol) and
sodium carbonate (1.05 g, 0.99 mmol, 2.0 equiv) were
dissolved in 50 ml of DMA and stirred briefly. 4-Methoxy-
phenethylchloride (0.86 g, 763 lL, 5.47 mmol, 5.07 mmol,
1.02 equiv) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature while monitoring for loss of the starting
materials. When the reaction was complete, the solvent was
removed under reduced pressure, and the residual material
was purified by chromatography with a hexane and ethyl
acetate gradient to yield 869 mg (52%) of the desired product.
Data from Table 1: Entry 1 (1H NMR, 300 MHz, CD3OD): d
3.22 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 3.76 (s, 3H), 4.69 (t, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz),
6.80 (d, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 7.01 (d, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz), 7.40 (m,
2H), 7.51 (m, 2H), 8.18 (s, 1H). (M+H+) 342. Entry 2 (1H
NMR, 300 MHz, CD3OD): d 3.26 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 3.75 (s,
3H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 4.78 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 6.83 (d, 2H,
J = 6.6 Hz), 7.0 (d, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.06 (d, 2H, J = 8.6 Hz),
8.08 (d, 2H, J = 8.9 Hz), 8.17 (s, 1H). (M+H+) 338. Entry 3
(1H NMR, 300 MHz, CD3OD): d 3.27 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz),
3.76 (s, 3H), 4.80 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 6.85 (d, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz),
7.06 (d, 2H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.50 (d, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz), 8.06 (d, 2H,
J = 6.7 Hz), 8.24 (s, 1H). (M+H+) 342. Entry 4 (1H NMR,
300 MHz, CD3OD): d 1.29 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.73, (q, 2H,
J = 6.9 Hz), 3.24 (t, 2H, J = 6.5 Hz), 3.72 (s, 3H), 4.75 (t, 2H,
J = 6.9 Hz), 6.81 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.03 (d, 2H,
J = 8.5 Hz), 7.31 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.98 (d, 2H, 8.3 Hz),
8.19 (s, 1H). (M+H+) 336. Entry 5 (1H NMR, 300 MHz,
CD3OD): d 3.29 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 3.77 (s, 3H), 4.83 (t, 2H,
J = 7.0 Hz), 6.86 (d, 2H, J = 6.5 Hz), 7.08 (d, 2H,
J = 6.7 Hz), 7.68 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.03 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9,
8.37 Hz), 8.29 (s, 1H), 8.32 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz). (M+H+) 376.
Entry 6 (1H NMR, 300 MHz, CD3OD): d 2.36 (s, 3H), 2.39,
(s, 3H), 3.27 (t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 3.77 (s, 3H), 4.78 (t, 2H,
J = 6.9 Hz), 6.84 (d, 2H, J = 9.7 Hz), 7.07 (d, 2H,
J = 8.4 Hz), 7.27 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.83 (d, 1H, 8.3 Hz),
7.90 (s, 1H), 8.20 (s, 1H). (M+H+) 336. Entry 7 (1H NMR,
300 MHz, CD3OD): d 1.38 (d, 6H, J = 7.4 Hz), 3.07 (m, 1H,
J = 7.2 Hz), 3.31 (t, 2H, J = 6.3 Hz), 3.81 (s, 3H), 4.82 (t, 2H,
J = 6.5 Hz), 6.91 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.12 (d, 2H,
J = 8.1 Hz), 7.41 (d, 2H, J = 8.1 Hz), 8.04 (d, 2H, 7.9 Hz),
8.26 (s, 1H). (M+H+) 350. Entry 8 (1H NMR, 300 MHz,
CD3OD): d 3.13 (s, 3H), 3.27 (t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 3.77 (s, 3H),
4.78 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 6.74 (d, 2H, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.85 (d, 2H,
J = 8.7 Hz), 7.06 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 8.02 (d, 2H, 9.3 Hz),
8.10 (s, 1H). (M+H+) 351. Entry 9 (1H NMR, 300 MHz,
CD3OD): d 3.11 (s, 6H), 3.26 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 3.76 (s, 3H),
3.79 (s, 3H), 4.70 (t, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.33 (d, 2H,
J = 6.5 Hz), 6.82 (d, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 7.05 (d, 1H,
J = 6.7 Hz), 7.45 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz) 7.97 (s, 1H). (M+H+)
381.
the triazole in a 2,4-orientation, verifying the structural
assignment of the active series (Fig. 2).8
Initial screening of this class of compounds was accom-
plished by whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology to
determine channel block in LTK cells expressing the
Kv1.5 channel.9 Results for some representative exam-
ples are shown in Table 1. From this data, one can con-
clude that substitution in the 4-position of the
acetophenone-derived portion of the scaffold is highly
favored. Increased lipophilicity is well tolerated (e.g.,
1g and 1h), but the difference between electron donating
and electron withdrawing is not substantial. Substitu-
tion in the 2-position of the same scaffold, however, ap-
pears to be detrimental to the desired activity. This is
especially clear in the comparison of entries 1h and 1i,
as the simple addition of a methoxy substituent in the
2-position eliminates all of the desired activity. Interest-
ingly, 1,4-regioisomer 5 showed no activity.
Of this set, entry 1f was selected for further progression
based on its selectivity for Kv1.5 over other channels.
The Kv1.5 blockade IC50 was 294 nM. Significantly de-
creased potency was observed at other related channels,
such as hERG channel (>50 lM), Kv1.3 channel
(10.1 lM), and the L-type calcium channel (26 lM). In
vivo efficacy was demonstrated after a 15 min infusion
of 30 mg/kg in an anesthetized pig model. An increase
of 12% in the atrial effective refractory period (AERP)
was observed, and the ventricular effective refractory
period (VERP) remained unchanged. Control experi-
ments showed no changes in AERP.
In summary, we have developed a new class of selective
Kv1.5 channel blockers, which demonstrate atrial selec-
tive prolongation of the effective refractory period in a
pig model of arrhythmic events.
References and notes
1. (a) Kannel, W. B.; Wolf, P. A.; Benjarmin, E. J.; Levy, D.
Am. J. Cardiol. 1998, 82, 2N; (b) Pratt, C. M.; Moye, L. A.
Am. J. Cardiol. 1990, 65, 20B; (c) Waldo, A. L.; Camm, A.
J.; Deruyther, H. Lancet 1996, 348, 7; (d) Tomasell, G.
Heart Drug 2001, 1, 183.
2. (a) Cross, P. E.; Arrowsmith, J. E.; Thomas, G. N.; Gwilt,
M.; Burges, R. A.; Higgins, A. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33,
1151; (b) Lenz, T. L.; Hilleman, D. E. Pharmacotherapy
2000, 20(7), 776.
3. (a) Wang, Z.; Fermini, B.; Nattel, S. Circ. Res. 1993, 73,
1061; (b) Li, G. R.; Feng, J.; Wang, Z.; Fermini, B.; Nattel,
S. Circ. Res. 1996, 78, 907; (c) Purerfellner, H. Curr. Med.
Chem. CV & H Agents 2004, 2, 79.
4. Cappellacci, L.; Franchetti, P.; Grifantini, M.; Messini, L.;
Lucacchini, A.; Martini, C. XIIIth Int. Symp. Med. Chem.
1994, P13; Sankyo, K.K. JP07017861-A; Kohn, E.; Liotta,
L. A. WO9507695-A1; Adams, A. D.; Heck, J. V.
US5350746-A; Im, C.; Maiti, S. N.; Micetich, R. G.;
Daneshtalab, M.; Atchison, K.; Phillips, O. A. J. Antibiot.
1994, 47, 1030; Alvarez, R.; Velazquez, S.; San Felix, A.;
Aquaro, S.; Clercq, E. de; Perno, C. F. J. Med. Chem. 1994,
37, 4185; Palhagen, S.; Canger, R.; Henriksen, O.; van
Parys, J. A.; Riviere, M. E.; Karolchyk, M. A. Epilepsy Res.
2001, 43, 115.
6. Experimental conditions: 1-(2-azidoethyl)-4-methoxy ben-
zene: 4-methoxyphenethyl alcohol (2.65 g, 17.4 mmol, 1.0
equiv) and triphenyl phosphine (4.57 g, 17.4 mmol, 1.0
equiv) were dissolved in 100 ml of dry THF under a nitrogen
atmosphere, the reaction mixture was stirred briefly, and then
diisopropylazodicarboxylate (3.87 g, 3.78 ml, 19.2 mmol, 1.1
equiv) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min,