2622
Journal of the American Ceramic Society—Ikeda et al.
Vol. 92, No. 11
Table I. Structural Units, Tc and Crystalline Phase, Refractive Index, and Dielectric Constant of the Glasses Prepared by the Sol–Gel
and Melt-Quench Methods
Structural units
Tc, Crystalline phase
Refractive index
Dielectric constant
Sol–gel method
TeO4, TeO6
5201C
BaTe2O6, a-TeO2
3701C
1.79
(l 5 660 nm)
19–22
(1 k–1 MHz)
Melt-quench method
TeO4, TeO3
2.10 (Takebe et al.2)
(l 5 587.6 nm)
27.5 (Hampton et al.4)
(24BaO–76TeO2)
BaTe4O9, a-TeO2
methods. The glass prepared by the sol–gel method had a Tc of
B5201C and contained a-TeO2 and BaTe2O6 crystalline phases,
whereas that prepared by the melt–quench method had a Tc
of B3701C and contained a-TeO2 and BaTe4O9 crystalline
phases. In the previous work,14 the phase formation temperature
of BaTe2O6 composed of the TeO6 units18 was much higher
than that of BaTe4O9 composed of the TeO4 units. Therefore,
the TeO6 units are thermodynamically more stable relative to
the TeO4 units. This is the reason that the glass produced by the
sol–gel method had a higher Tc than the one by the melt-quench
method.
The BaO–TeO2 glass produced by the sol–gel method had
smaller refractive index and dielectric constant than that pro-
duced by the melt-quench method. The TeO4 unit has a trigonal
bipyramidal structure, in which one equatorial site of the Te sp3d
hybrid orbitals is occupied by a lone pair of electrons and the
other two equatorial sites are occupied by oxygen atoms.3,19 The
TeO3 unit has a trigonal pyramidal structure, in which one of
the Te sp3 hybrid orbitals is occupied by a lone pair of elec-
trons.3,19 The presence of these lone pairs leads to a high po-
larizability.20 Therefore, the tellurite glasses containing the TeO3
and TeO4 units have a high refractive index and high dielectric
constant. On the contrary, the TeO6 unit has a six-coordinated
tellurium(VI) oxygen with an octahedral structure, which does
not contained a lone pair of electrons and does not have a dis-
torted structure.21 Therefore, the polarizability of the TeO6 units
may be low relative to the TeO3 and TeO4 units. As a result, the
refractive index and dielectric constant of the glasses prepared
by the sol–gel method, which contain the TeO6 and TeO4 units,
are lower than those of the glasses prepared by the melt-quench
method, which contain the TeO3 and TeO4 units.
References
1H. Burger, W. Vogel, and V. Kozhukharov, ‘‘IR Transmission and Properties
of Glasses in the TeO2–[RnOm, RnXm, Rn(SO4)m, Rn(PO3)m and B2O3] Systems,’’
Infrared Phys., 25 [1–2] 395–409 (1985).
2H. Takebe, S. Fujino, and K. Morinaga, ‘‘Refractive-Index Dispersion of
Tellurite Glasses in the Region from 0.40 to 1.71 mm,’’ J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 77 [9]
2455–7 (1994).
3N. Mochida, K. Nakata, and S. Shibusawa, ‘‘Properties and Structure of
the Binary Tellurite Glasses Containing Mono- and Di-valent Cations,’’ Yogyo–
Kyokai–Shi, 86 [7] 317–25 (1978).
4R. N. Hampton, H. Wang, G. A. Saunders, and R. A. El-mallawany,
‘‘The Dielectric-Properties of Tellurite Glass,’’ Phys. Chem. Glasses, 29 [3] 100–5
(1988).
5S. H. Kim, T. Yoko, and S. Sakka, ‘‘Linear and Nonlinear-Optical Properties
of TeO2 Glass,’’ J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76 [10] 2486–90 (1993).
6G. S. Murugan, T. Suzuki, and Y. Ohishi, ‘‘Tellurite Glasses for Ultra-
broadband Fiber Raman Amplifiers,’’ Appl. Phys. Lett., 86 [16] 161109, 3pp
(2005).
7Y. W. S. Dai, F. Chen, T. Xu, and Q. Nie, ‘‘Physical Properties and Optical
Band Gap of New Tellurite Glasses within the TeO2–Nb2O5–Bi2O3 System,’’
Mater. Chem. Phys., 113 [1] 407–11 (2009).
8H. M. M. Moawad, H. Jain, and R. El-Mallawany, ‘‘DC Conductivity of Silver
Vanadium Tellurite Glasses,’’ J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 70 [1] 224–33 (2009).
9L. Weng and S. N. B. Hodgson, ‘‘Sol–Gel Processing of Tellurite Materials
from Tellurium Ethoxide Precursor,’’ Mater. Sci. Eng., B87 [1] 77–82 (2001).
10A. Lecomte, E. Bamiere, S. Coste, P. Thomas, and J. C. Champarnaud-
Mesjard, ‘‘Sol–Gel Processing of TeO2 Thin Films from Citric Acid Stab-
ilised Tellurium Isopropoxide Precursor,’’ J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 27 [2–3] 1151–8
(2007).
11L. Weng, S. N. B. Hodgson, and J. Ma, ‘‘Preparation of TeO2-TiO2 Thin
Films by Sol-Gel Process,’’ J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 18 [24] 2037–9 (1999).
12L. Weng, S. Hodgson, X. Bao, and K. Sagoe-Crentsil, ‘‘Achieving Control-
lable Sol–Gel Processing of Tellurite Glasses Through the Use of Te(VI) Precur-
sors,’’ Mater. Sci. Eng., B107 [1] 89–93 (2004).
13R. Swanepoel, ‘‘Determination of the Thickness and Optical-Constants of
Amorphous-Silicon,’’ J. Phys. E : Sci. Instrum., 16 [12] 1214–22 (1983).
14H. Sieberg, ‘‘Ultrarotspektren Von Tellursauren, Telluraten Und Antimona-
ten,’’ Zeitschrift Fur Anorganische Und Allgemeine Chemie, 301 [3–4] 161–70
(1959).
15M. Dimitrovapankova, Y. Dimitriev, M. Arnaudov, and V. Dimitrov, ‘‘In-
frared Spectral Investigation of the Influence of Modifying Oxides on the Structure
of Tellurite Glasses,’’ Phys. Chem. Glasses, 30 [6] 260–3 (1989).
16M. J. Collins and J. A. Ripmeester, ‘‘CP/MAS in Solids: An Example of
125Te35,37Cl J Coupling,’’ J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109 [13] 4113–5 (1987).
17S. Sakida, S. Hayakawa, and T. Yoko, ‘‘125Te NMR Study of MO–TeO2
(M5 Mg, Zn, Sr, Ba, and Pb) Glasses,’’ J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., 107 [5] 395–402
(1999).
IV. Conclusions
BaO–TeO2 thin films were prepared in air from tellurium(VI)
alkoxide. The thin films heat treated at 4501C were transparent
in the visible region. Their refractive index was about 1.79 in
the transparent region, dielectric constant was about 20 between
1 kHz and 1 MHz, and Tc was about 5201C. These films had a
higher Tc and lower refractive index and dielectric constant than
the the glass prepared by the by melt-quench method. These
differences may arise from differences of their structural units.
18D. K. Kwon, M. T. Lanagan, and T. R. Shrout, ‘‘Microwave Dielectric Prop-
erties of BaO–TeO2 Binary Compounds,’’ Mater. Lett., 61 [8–9] 1827–31 (2007).
19E. F. Lambson, G. A. Saunders, B. Bridge, and R. A. El-mallawany, ‘‘The
Elastic Behavior of TeO2 Glass under Uniaxial and Hydrostatic-Pressure,’’ J. Non-
Cryst. Solids, 69 [1] 117–33 (1984).
20R. R. Reddy, Y. N. Ahammed, P. A. Azeem, K. R. Gopal, and T. V. R.
Rao, ‘‘Electronic Polarizability and Optical Basicity Properties of Oxide
Glasses Through Average Electronegativity,’’ J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 286 [3] 169–
80 (2001).
Acknowledgment
21M. Kocak, C. Platte, and M. Tromel, ‘‘Barium Hexaoxoditellurate(IV,VI)-
Oxygen Coordination Number 5 with Tetravalent Tellurium,’’ Acta Cryst, B35
The authors would like to thank Dr. Yomei Tokuda of Institute for Chem-
ical Research, Kyoto University for the NMR measurements and thoughtful
comments.
1439–41 (1979).
&