Please do not adjust margins
New Journal of Chemistry
Page 6 of 8
DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ03265J
ARTICLE
Journal Name
mass measurements were performed at a resolution of random individuals with a population size of 100 individuals
140.000.
was employed, a maximum number of 2.5 x 106 energy
evaluations, a maximum number of 27,000 generations, a
Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS).
The detection of the inclusion complex CAM1-CB7 was mutation rate of 0.02 and a cross-over rate of 0.80. The
undertaken on an AB SCIEX Triple Quad™ 4500 LC/MS/MS docked compound complexes were built using the lowest
Mass Spectrometer equipped with a Turbo Ion Spray (AB docked-energy binding positions.
Sciex) ion source. Specific compound-dependent MS Molecular dynamic simulations
parameters for each dye were determined by direct infusion Each host-guest complex was solvated with a TIP3 water
into the MS of individual standards dissolved in 10% (vol/vol) model and submitted to molecular dynamics (MD)
acetonitrile (concentration of 25 μM) at a flow rate of 7 simulations for 10 ns using a NPT ensemble. NAMD 2.6 was
μL/min. The 4500 QTRAP system was operated in positive ion used to perform MD calculations.18,19 Periodic boundary
mode using the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) scan conditions were applied to the system in the three
type. A declustering potential (DP) of +180, entrance coordinate directions.
A pressure of 1 atm and a
potential (EP) of +10, and collision cell exit potential (CXP) of temperature of 310 K were maintained.
+25 were used. The ion spray voltage was set at +3500 V,
Keywords: keto-enol equilibrium • β-ketodithioester •
cucurbit[7]uril • coumarin • dicarbonyl compounds.
source temperature was set at 300 °C, collision gas (CAD)
was set to high, and source gas GS1 and GS2 were set to 10
and 20, respectively. All data were acquired using Analyst
1.6.2 (AB Sciex).
Acknowledgements
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies.
1H NMR spectra were obtained at 25 °C on Bruker Avance
400 MHz spectrometer using TMS as an internal standard.
The NMR spectra were processed with MestreNova software
v9.0.
This work was supported by FONDECYT grant #1170753,
FONDEQUIP EQM-130032, Institutional Fellowship for Academics
(VRI-PUC) and
Pontificia
Universidad
Católica
de
Chile Projects 3913-189-81 and Puente Nº P1708/2017.
Determination of the quantum yield of emission.
Fluorescence quantum yields of dyes were measured using a
solution of quinine sulfate in 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 as standard (Φs
= 0.546). All values were corrected taking into account the
solvent refraction index. Quantum yields were calculated
using Eq. 1, where the subscripts x and s denote sample and
standard, respectively, Ф is the quantum yield, η is the
refractive index, and Grad is the gradient from the plot of
integrated fluorescence intensity vs. absorbance.
References
1
(a) J. Catalán, J. C. D. Valle, M. Kasha, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1999, 96, 8338-8343; (b) M. F. Goodman, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 10493-10495; (c) P. Nissen, J.
Hansen, N. Ban, P. B. Moore, T. A. Steitz, Science 2000, 289
,
920-930; (d) P. Naumov, M. Kochunnoonny, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 11566-11579; (e) M. Miura, J. Harada, K.
Ogawa, J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 9854-9858; (f) K. Epa, C.
B. Aakeröy, J. Desper, S. Rayat, K. L. Chandra, A. J. Cruz-
Cabeza, Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7929-7931; (g) D. J.
ꢉ
Φꢀ = Φ ꢁ ꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆꢀꢇ ꢂꢈꢈꢉꢀꢇ
(Eq. 1)
Sardella, D. H. Heinert, B. L. Shapiro, J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34
2817-2821.
,
ꢃꢄꢅꢆ
ꢁ
ꢁ
2
C. Reichardt, T. Welton in Solvents and Solvent Effects in
Organic Chemistry, Fourth Edition, (Eds.: C. Reichardt and T.
Welton) Wiley-VCH, Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim,
2011, pp. 121-123.
Modeling molecular studies
The dyes were constructed using Gaussian0317 and the
partial charges of compounds were corrected using ESP
methodology. Topology and parameters for CAM1 and
CAM2 and CB7 were obtained using the ParamChem server,
which uses CHARMM27 force field and a database to organic
compounds.
3
4
E. Iglesias, V. Ojea-Cao, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 3954-3963.
K. Gavvala, R. K. Koninti, A. Sengupta, P. Hazra, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 2823-2826.
N. Saleh, A. R. Ba Suwaid, A. Alhalabi, A. Z. A. Abuibaid, O. V.
Maltsev, L. Hintermann, P. Naumov, J. Phys. Chem. B 2016,
120, 7671-7680.
5
6
M. E. Aliaga, A. Fierro, I. Uribe, L. García-Río, A. Cañete,
Chem. Phys. Chem. 2016, 17, 3300-3308.
Molecular Docking
In order to obtain information regarding the principal host-
guest interactions, the molecular docking of CAM1 and
CAM2 in CB7 was carried out using AutoDock 4.0 suite.18 In
general, the grid maps were calculated using the autogrid4
option and were located on the center of β-CD. The volumes
for the grid maps were 40 x 40 x 40 points (a grid-point
spacing of 0.375 Å). The autotors option was used to define
the rotating bonds in the ligand. In the Lamarckian genetic
algorithm (LGA) dockings, an initial population of 1500
7
8
E. Iglesias, J. Incl. Phen. Mac. Chem. 2005, 52, 55-62.
(a) N. Barooah, M. Sundararajan, J. Mohanty, A. C.
Bhasikuttan, J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 7136-7146; (b) N.
Barooah, J. Mohanty, H. Pal, A. C. Bhasikuttan, Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2012, 10, 5055-5062; (c) N. Barooah, J. Mohanty, H.
Pal and A. C. Bhasikuttan, J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 3683-
3689; (d) A. L. Koner, W. Nau, Supramol. Chem. 2007, 19, 55-
66; (e) R. N. Dsouza, U. Pischel, W. M. Nau, Chem. Rev. 2011,
111, 7941-7980 and references therein.
6 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins