Table 1 Condensation of isobutene and formaldehyde to 3-methylbut-3-en-1-ol (MBOH) over silica based catalysts and catalyst recyclinga
SnCl
loading/mmol
(g support)
4
Conversion of
formaldehydeb
(%)
MBOH
selectivity
(%)
c
MBOH yieldd
(%)
21
Entry
Catalyst
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SnCl
SnCl
SIL–TPA SnCl
MCM–TPA SnCl
Recycling 1
Recycling 2
MCM–TPA SnCl
SIL–TPA–SnCl
SIL/SnCl
4
4
—
—
97.4
54.6
89.0
88.1
94.0
94.1
93.5
90.1
79.8
63.2
53.0
68.7
56.4
71.4
69.9
70.0
90.1
45.5
49.2
–TPACle
77.1 (2.68)
64.1 (2.22)
76.0 (2.63)
74.3
74.9
100
+
2f
5
0.46
1.11
1.10
—
1.11
0.32
0.95
+
2g
2i
5
h
+
5
j
4
57.0
77.9
4
a
5
4
6 g isobutene, 3 g paraformaldehyde, catalyst containing 4 mmol of SnCl and 40 g of chloroform solvent were introduced in the reactor and stirred for
b
23
c
2
h at 60 °C. The turnover number (TON) based on the no. of mol of formaldehyde converted per mol of catalyst per s (310 ) shown in parentheses. Other
d
products included 4,4-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane and traces of poly-condensation products. Yield was determined by using butan-2-ol as an internal standard.
e
f
complex. g TPACl-functionalised MCM-41–SnCl
complex. h Recycling of MCM–
TPACl–SnCl
4
complex. TPACl-functionalised silica–SnCl
4
4
+
2
i
j
TPA SnCl
5
after exhaustive washing with dichloromethane. Reaction continued for 3.5 h. Direct immobilization of complex on silica.
(TON = 2.63 3 10 s21) as that obtained in solution with the
23
detector, sensitivity > 0.1 wt%) were found to be 0.46 and 1.11
mmol g , respectively. The MCM-41 structure remained intact
after the catalyst anchoring. The retention of organic groups on
2
1
23 21
homogeneous catalyst (TON = 2.68 3 10
s ). We believe
that the accessibility of the active sites for the reactants will be
highest in the present case as it is anchored to the support
through a organic chain rather than being directly bonded to the
support surface. In addition, the regular and well ordered
hexagonal array of pores present in the MCM-41 support
provides nanosized micro-reactors for the reaction. The better
catalytic activity obtained with the MCM-41 supported catalyst
compared to the silica supported counterpart indicates a
favorable reaction environment inside the well ordered pores of
the former where the active sites are grafted through an organic
spacer. Another important feature of this catalyst is the higher
concentration of active sites per gram of the support compared
to the silica support.
4
the functionalized support after anchoring the SnCl was proved
by IR spectroscopy. The formation of a complex between tin
chloride and tetrapropylammonium chloride in dichlorome-
thane solution was confirmed by 1 Sn NMR (external stan-
dard). A shift in the NMR signal from 2665.0 to 2725.2 ppm
after the reaction with tetrapropylammonium chloride reflects a
19
7
change in the coordination number at tin. The tin/chlorine
atomic ratio in the anchored catalysts determined by elemental
+
2
analysis (EDAX): 0.195 for SIL–TPA SnCl
5
and 0.204 for
2
5
, was in accordance with such complex
+
MCM–TPA SnCl
formation. The solid state 1 Sn MAS NMR study of the SnCl
19
–
4
tetraalkylammonium adduct anchored on MCM-41 is now in
progress in order to obtain more precise definition of the
environment around the Sn.
T. M. J. is grateful to the Blechner foundation for a post-
doctoral fellowship.
The results of the Prins condensation of isobutene and
formaldehyde to isoprenol over different catalysts are summa-
rized in Table 1.†‡ It is clear that complexation of tin chloride
with tetrapropylammonium chloride improves the selectivity
towards the unsaturated alcohol. Tin chloride alone under
anhydrous conditions displayed high activity but the selectivity
to MBOH was poor. The tin chloride catalysts immobilized on
organic quaternary ammonium functionalized silica/MCM-41
showed highest selectivity towards the unsaturated alcohol,
MBOH (88–95%). More interestingly, the MCM-41 based
catalyst is far more active than its silica counterpart and
outperforms the latter both in terms of isoprenol yield and
catalyst turnover. An X-ray fluorescence spectroscopic analysis
of the filtrate after the reaction (X-ray spectrometer Phillips
PW-1410; sensitivity > 0.5 ppm Sn) revealed that the new
catalysts are resistant to leaching under the reaction conditions.
Furthermore, when a subsequent reaction was performed with
the filtrate after separating the catalyst by adding fresh
formaldehyde and isobutene, no formaldehyde conversion was
observed. Recycling of the catalyst leads to no appreciable loss
in activity. Increasing the reaction time to 3.5 h, increased the
MBOH yield to a maximum of 90%. The performance of an
Notes and references
† Tetrapropylammonium chloride (4 mmol) was dissolved in 40 g of dry
dichloromethane and 1.04 g (4 mmol) of anhydrous tin chloride was added
slowly with constant stirring. The mixture was stirred overnight at ambient
temperature and the solution was concentrated in vacuo to obtain a white
crystalline material which was recrystallised from dichloromethane–hexane
and stored under moisture free conditions. Analysis: found (calc.) Sn 24.78
(24.61), Cl 36.40 (36.74)%.
‡
The Silica/TPA–SnCl catalyst was prepared by adding a chloroform
4
solution of the complex prepared as mentioned above to 4 g of pre-dried
silica support suspended in chloroform with constant stirring. The excess
solvent was removed after overnight stirring and the material was extracted
with chloroform for 12 h in a Soxhlet apparatus. The material was finally
dried and kept under moisture free conditions before use.
1
2
Chemistry of Waste Minimisation, ed. J. H. Clark, Chapman and Hall,
London, 1995, p. 141.
R. S. Drago, S. C. Petrosius and P. B. Kaufman, J. Mol. Catal., 1994, 89,
3
17; A. A. Krzywicki and M. Marczewski, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.
1
, 1980, 1311; S. J. Barlow, T. W. Bastock, J. H. Clark and S. R. Cullen,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 3339; A. Cornellis, A. Gerstmans, P. Laszlo,
A. Mathy and I. Zreba, Catal. Lett., 1990, 6, 103.
3 D. Brunel, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 1999, 27, 329.
4 A. P. Courtot, J. Chem. Soc., 1906, 90, 788.
SnCl
4
/silica catalyst, prepared by treating a chloroform solution
of tin chloride and silica, in the selective synthesis of MBOH is
poor compared to immobilized complexes. Also, a direct
immobilization of the complex on silica (Silica/TPA–SnCl )
4
5
6
E. Arundale and L. A. Mikelska, Chem. Rev., 1952, 52, 505.
G. A. Parshall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972, 94, 8716; P. Wasserscheid and
W. Keim, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3772; C. DeCastro, E.
Sauvage, M. H. Valkenberg and W. F. Holderich, J. Catal., 2000, 196,
was not advantageous in terms of MBOH yield.
The present MCM-41 based Lewis acid catalyst system
satisfactorily meets the ultimate aims of heterogenization of
metal complexes. In short, we have demonstrated the prepara-
tion and application of a novel stable, reusable, heterogeneous
Lewis acid catalyst, which shows almost the same turnover rate
8
6.
7
S. E. Johnson and C. B. Knobler, Organometallics, 1992, 11, 3684;
Kuraray Co. Ltd., Jpn. Pat., H09-262478, 1997.
8 M. V. Landau, S. P. Varkey, M. Herskowitz, O. Regev, S. Pevzner, T. Sen
and Z. Luz, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 1999, 33, 149.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 992–993
993