10.1002/cctc.201701629
ChemCatChem
FULL PAPER
a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in an N2 stream and platinum pan. Fe content
of each of the Fe/N/C catalysts was characterized by inductively coupled
plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) using a SHIMAZDU
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number
25708031 in a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A), JP15H03857,
JP17H05370 in Innovative Areas “Coordination Asymmetry” to
A.O., JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP15H05804 in Innovative
Areas “Precisely Designed Catalysts with Customized Scaffolding”
to T.H. Y.T. expresses his special thanks to the support from the
Interactive Material Science Cadet program (IMSC) and a JSPS
Research Fellowship (16J00939). We acknowledge Dr. Shinji
Tamura and Prof. Nobuhito Imanaka at Department of Applied
Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University for
Raman measurements, and the staff for their excellent support
during the data collection on BL11 at SAGA-LS.
ICPS-7510 system. Specific surface areas were obtained using
a
MicrotracBEL BELSORP-miniII system. The Raman spectra were
obtained using a JASCO NRS-3100 instrument with a 532 nm laser. X-ray
diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were obtained using an X-ray
diffractometer (Rigaku, SmartLab) equipped with a Cu K source. The
contents of iron oxide for the catalysts were estimated by the peak intensity
with the correction using the values of reference intensity ratio (RIR); 0.9%
(Fe/Salen@VC), 1.3% (Fe/Saloph@VC), 1.8% (Fe/1NAPD@VC), 1.1%
(Fe/2NAED@VC), and 1.2% (Fe/2NAPD@VC).Transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a HITACHI H-7650
microscope operated at 100 kV of accelerating voltage. High-resolution
transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) observations and the
chemical composition analyses were carried out using a HITACHI HF-
2000 field emission TEM operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.
The chemical composition of each samples was analyzed by EDS made
of NORAN Instruments. The analyses were carried out using an electron
probe of approximately 25 nm in diameter. The characteristic X-ray of iron
was collected with an ultra-thin window X-ray detector at a high take-off
angle of 68 degrees. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) was performed
at the BL11 beamline of SAGA Light Source (SAGA-LS) in Kyusyu, Japan.
The Fe K-edge spectra were analyzed by Athena program.[49] X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on a
KRATOS AXIS-165x (SHIMADZU) system, equipped with a Mg K X-ray
source. Individual chemical components of the N 1s binding energy region
were fitted to the spectra after a Tougaard-type background subtraction.
Electrochemical measurement. A rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE)
with a glassy carbon disk electrode ( =5 mm) and platinum ring was used
for evaluation of the carbon catalysts. Electrode rotation rates were
controlled using a Pine Instruments AFMSRCE rotator with a Pine MSRX
motor controller. The electrode was polished to mirror flat with alumina
powder (50 nm) before use. The catalyst ink was prepared with 4.0 mg of
Keywords: Fe/N/C catalyst • -expanded Fe(salen) complexes •
oxygen reduction reaction • cathode catalyst • fuel cell
[1]
[2]
[3]
M. K. Debe, Nature 2012, 486, 43−51.
Q. Li, R. Cao, J. Cho, G. Wu, Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1301415.
D. Higgins, P. Zamani, A. Yu, Z. Chen, Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 357
−390.
[4]
J. Snyder, T. Fujita, M. W. Chen, J. Erlebacher, Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 904
−907.
[5]
[6]
A. Rabis, P. Rodriguez, T. J. Schmidt, ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 864−890.
M. Shao, Q. Chang, J.-P. Dodelet, R. Chenitz, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116,
3594−3657.
[7]
F. Jaouen, E. Proietti, M. Lefevre, R. Chenitz, J.-P. Dodelet, G. Wu, H. T.
Chung, C. M. Johnston, P. Zelenay, Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 114−
130.
[8]
[9]
Z. Chen, D. Higgins, A. Yu, L. Zhang, J. Zhang, Energy Environ. Sci.
2011, 4, 3167−3192.
G. Wu, P. Zelenay, Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1878−1889.
[10] R. Bashyam, P. Zelenay, Nature 2006, 443, 63−66.
[11] M. Lefèvre, E. Proietti, F. Jaouen, J.-P. Dodelet, Science 2009, 324, 71−
74.
catalyst
(Fe/Salen@VC,
Fe/Saloph@VC,
Fe/1NAED@VC,
[12] G. Wu, K. L. More, C. M. Johnston, P. Zelenay, Science 2011, 332, 443
−47.
Fe/1NAPD@VC, Fe/2NAED@VC or Fe/2NAPD@VC) and 100 µL of 5
wt% Nafion® (Sigma-Aldrich) in mixture of lower aliphatic alcohols and H2O.
The ink was vortexed and sonicated in an ultrasonic bath at 100 W at 35
kHz for 30 min. Then 10 µL of catalyst ink was loaded onto the surface of
the electrode and dried.
[13] Y. Liang, Y. Li, H. Wang, J. Zhou, J. Wang, T. Regier, H. Dai, Nat. Mater.
2011, 10, 780−786.
[14] Y. Nabae, M. Sonoda, C. Yamauchi, Y. Hosaka, A. Isoda, T. Aoki, Catal.
Sci. Tech. 2014, 4, 1400−1406.
[15] T. Ishii, T. Maie, M. Hamano, T. Kishimoto, M. Mizushiri, Y. Imashiro, J.-
i. Ozaki, Carbon 2017, 116, 591−598.
Electrochemical tests were carried out on a potentiostat (ALS,
electrochemical analyzer model 610B) using a typical three-electrode
system, with platinum wire as the counter electrode and Ag/AgCl as the
reference electrode. The potential difference between Ag/AgCl and RHE
was calculated and the value is 0.258 V in a 0.1 M HClO4 solution. The
scan rate for all measurements was 5 mV·s−1 from −0.258 to 0.742 V
versus the Ag/AgCl reference electrode. Before each potential scan, the
electrolyte of the 0.1 M HClO4 solution was saturated with O2 for at least
30 min, and O2 purging was continued during the electrochemical
experiments. The measured current was subtracted from the background
current at the N2-saturated electrolyte. In the RRDE test, the ring potential
was set to 1.0 V versus the Ag/AgCl reference electrode.
[16] R. Jasinski, Nature 1964, 201, 1212−1213.
[17] H. Jahnke, M. Schönborn, G. Zimmermann, Top. Curr. Chem. 1976, 61,
133−181.
[18] G. Lalande, R. Côté, G. Tamizhmani, D. Guay, J. P. Dodelet, L. Dignard-
Bailey, L. T. Weng, P. Bertrand, Electrochim. Acta 1995, 40, 2635-−2646.
[19] S. Gupta, D. Tryk, I. Bae, W. Aldred, E. Yeager, J. Appl. Electrochem.
1989, 19, 19−27.
[20] J.-P. Dodelet, R. Chenitz, L. Yang, M. Lefèvre, ChemCatChem 2014, 6,
1866−1867.
[21] Y. Hu, J. O. Jensen, W. Zhang, L. N. Cleemann, W. Xing, N. J. Bjerrum,
Q. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 3675−3679.
[22] U. I. Kramm, J. Herranz, N. Larouche, T. M. Arruda, M. Lefevre, F.
Jaouen, P. Bogdanoff, S. Fiechter, I. Abs-Wurmbach, S. Mukerjee, J.-P.
Dodelet, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 11673−11688.
[23] N. Ramaswamy, U. Tylus, Q. Jia, S. Mukerjee, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013,
135, 15443−15449.
The RRDE collection efficiency (N) was calibrated in 0.1 M HClO4 with
10 mM K3Fe(CN)6 electrolyte. The measured N value is 0.26 in our system.
The H2O2 yield was calculated by following the equation:
H2O2(%) = 2 Ir / (N x |Id| + Ir) x 100
[24] Q. Jia, N. Ramaswamy, U. Tylus, K. Strickland, J. Li, A. Serov, K.
Artyushkova, P. Atanassov, J. Anibal, C. Gumeci, S. C. Barton, M.-T.
where Ir represents the ring current and Id represents the disk current.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.