Angewandte Chemie International Edition
10.1002/anie.201902109
COMMUNICATION
N-C-1 and Pt/C catalysts dramatically increase from 42.4 mV at 1
mA cm-2 and 1 mV at 10 mA cm-2 to 25.7 mV at 100 mA cm-2
(
Figure S15b), suggesting that the Zn-N-C-1 catalyst is more
conducive to the mass-transfer at higher current densities. The
specific capacity was measured according to the consumption of
−2
Zn (Figure S16). At 100 mA cm , the Zn-N-C-1 catalyst enabled
the Zn–O
battery with a specific capacity of 683.3 mAh gZn−1
about 83.3% utilization of the theoretical capacity 820 mAh gZn−1),
2
(
−
1
corresponding to a high energy density of 666 Wh kgZn (about
6
−
1
1.3% of the theoretical energy density 1086 Wh kgZn ). These
values also significantly outperform those of the battery prepared
−
1
with Pt/C (specific capacity of 601.4 mAh gZn and energy density
−
1
of 563 Wh kgZn ), and even comparable to the best results
recently reported for Zn-O batteries (Table S5).
2
In conclusion, we have successfully synthesized ultrahigh
loading Zn single-atom catalysts by controlling the annealing rate
of ZnCl
experiments reveal that Zn-N
2
precursor at 1º/min. The XANES and EXAFS
is the main active site in Zn-N-C
4
catalyst. Electrochemical experiment tests show that the
atomically dispersed Zn-N-C catalyst exhibits not only
comparable ORR activity with Fe-N-C catalyst in both acidic and
alkaline media, but also better durability than that of Fe-N-C
catalyst. XPS analysis demonstrates that the Zn-N-C-1 catalyst is
less susceptible to protonate than Fe-N-C-1 catalyst in acidic
medium. Meanwhile, DFT calculations reveal that the Zn-N
4
Figure 4. (a) DFT-optimized structures of PNG and PNG-O as non-protonated,
structure is more electrochemical stable than the Fe-N structure
during ORR process. This work may represent a new class of
high-efficiency and stable single-atom site catalysts for both
fundamental research and practical applications.
4
protonation-H and protonation-2H. (b) Free energy diagrams for the Zn(OH)
Fe(OH) and Fe(OH) during the metal corrosion process based on M-N
M=Zn/Fe) structure.
2
,
2
3
4
(
existence of O
2
will accelerate the breaking of C-N bond, and thus
decrease the number of active sites and reduce the ORR activity. Acknowledgements
The anti-corrosion ability of Zn-N
4
and Fe-N
4
structures is
also evaluated by DFT calculation.[13] The OH , which is the ORR
*
This work was financially supported by the National Key Research
intermediate, can adsorb on the metal sites and then oxidize them. and Development Program of China (2016YFB0101202), and by
Once two OH* bond to a metal site, the oxidized metal tends to
dissociate in the solution. As shown in Figure 4b, the free energy
transferring Zn site (*Zn) to *Zn(OH) is 1.42 eV, which is much
larger than the value of 1.07eV for the formation of *Fe(OH).
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.
21761162015, 91534205, 21436003, 21576031, and 21776023).
Keywords: fuel cells • metal-air battery • oxygen reduction
Moreover, we found that the formation of *Zn(OH)
is almost impossible because the free energy is larger than 10 eV.
While, the formation of *Fe(OH) from *Fe(OH) is feasible due to
the low free energy (ΔG = 1.68 eV). These results indicate that
the corrosion of *Zn site in Zn-N structure is tougher than that of
Fe site in Fe-N during ORR process. This phenomenon can be
attributed to the distinction of valence electron configurations
2
from *Zn(OH)
reaction • electrocatalyst • Zn single-atom catalyst
2
[1]
a) M. K. Debe, Nature 2012, 486, 43-51; b) J. Guo, C. –Y. Lin, Z. Xia, Z.
Xiang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57,12567-12572; c) S. G. Chen, Z.
D. Wei, X. Q. Qi, L. C. Dong, Y. G. Guo, L. J. Wan, Z. G. Shao and L. Li,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13252-13255.
4
*
4
[2]
[3]
[4]
M. Lefèvre, E. Proietti, F. Jaouen, J.–P. Dodelet, Science 2009, 324, 71-
74.
between Fe(3d
6
4s
2
) and Zn(3d104s
2
), in which the Fe site with
J. Li, S. Chen, W. Li, R. Wu, S. Ibraheem, J. Li, W. Ding, L. Li, Z. Wei, J.
Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 15504-15509.
*
more d empty orbital tends to adsorb OH and form Fe(OH)
species in the ORR process.
X
X. F. Yang, A. Wang, B. Qiao, J. Li, J. Liu, T. Zhang, Acc. Chem. Res.
Finally, we constructed a Zn-O
potential of our catalyst for real energy conversion devices
Figure S14).[14] Commercial Pt/C was also tested under the
same conditions for comparison. The maximum power density for
2
battery to evaluate the
2
013, 46, 1740-1748.
[5]
Z. Y. Wu, X. X. Xu, B. C. Hu, H. W. Liang, Y. Lin, L. F. Chen, S. H. Yu,
Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 8297-8301.
(
[6]
[7]
J. Shui, M. Wang, F. Du, L. Dai, Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, 1:e1400129.
P. Song, M. Luo, X. Liu, W. Xing, W. Xu, Z. Jiang, L. Gu, Adv. Funct.
Mater. 2017, 27, 1700802.
−
2
Zn-N-C-1 catalyst is 179 mW cm , slightly higher than that of Pt/C
−2
(
173 mW cm ) (Figure S15a). The potential gaps between Zn-N-
[
8]
9]
S. H. Ahn, X. Yu, A. Manthiram, Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606534.
R. Lang, T. Li, D. Matsumura, S. Miao, Y. Ren, Y. –T. Cui, Y. Tan, B.
Qiao, L. Li, A. Wang, X. Wang, T. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016,
C-1 and Pt/C catalysts at different discharge currents were also
calculated to give insight into the origin of high activity of the Zn-
N-C-1 catalyst. It was found that the potential gaps between Zn-
[
55, 16054-16058.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.