J. Liu et al. / Electrochimica Acta 212 (2016) 113–121
117
[F(ig._7)TD$FIG]
3.3. Photoelectrocatalytic oxidation of UA
While turning on the light, as depicted by Figs. 4 and 5, the
catalytic currents or linear slopes are enhanced, suggesting that
the visible light irradiation facilitates the oxidation of UA. In the
absence of Ru(II)PTPP, the anodic electric field extracts the excited
electrons from conducting band of CdS, yielding photocurrent
response from CdS/ITO electrode and visible light-enhanced
oxidation current response of UA (Fig. 4b). Similarly, the visible
irradiation can promote Ru(II)PTPP to generate Ru(III)PTPP, which
oxidizes UA to regenerate Ru(II)PTPP, leading to an increase in the
catalytic oxidation of UA. To further demonstrate the contribution
of the light irradiation to the oxidation of UA, Fig. 6 gives
absorption spectra of Ru(II)PTPP/CdS/ITO, Ru(II)PTPP/ITO and CdS/
ITO electrodes in visible wavelength regions, showing metal-to-
ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transition characteristics of [Ru
2
+
(
phen)
2
(IP-)] moiety at 455 nm, Soret and Q bands of TPP moiety
Fig. 7. Effects of increasing UA concentration on open-circuit photovoltage (VOCP) of
Ru(II)PTPP/CdS/ITO electrode vs. Ag/AgCl electrode upon visible light irradiation
under nitrogen (1) or oxygen (2) atmospheres. The line 3 was obtained by
subtracting line 2 with line 1.
at 430, 560 and 610 nm, as well as characteristic absorbance band
of CdS [54]. The result suggests that Ru(II)PTPP can absorb the
visible light to form [Ru(phen) (IP-)] and TPP-based excited
2
2+
*
*
states, i.e. Ru(II)P TPP and Ru(II)PTPP , which are expressed as
electron donors that sustain the integrity of the CdS and Ru(II)PTPP
sensitizers [7,59]. Consequently, UA is photoelectrocatalytically
oxidized on the Ru(II)PTPP/CdS/ITO anode as depicted by Eqs. (4)–
Eq. (3).
RuðIIÞPTPP@h RuðIIÞP TPP þ RuðIIÞPTPP
n
ꢄ
ꢄ
ð3Þ
(
5).
*
To illustrate the electron transfer among Ru(II)P TPP, Ru(II)
PTPP , and CdS conduction band, their energy levels vs. NHE are
compared. The previously reported results from voltammetric
measurements have shown that the excited MLCT state potential of
*
ꢄ
ꢀ
RuðIIÞP TPP þ CdS@RuðIIIÞPTPP þ CdSðe Þ
ð4Þ
ð5Þ
2
+
[Ru(phen)
2
(IP-)]
is ꢀ1.24 V [44], which is above the CdS
RuðIIIÞPTPP þ UA!RuðIIÞPTPP þ UAOx
conduction band edge (ꢀ0.95 V) [57], ensuring electron injection
into the CdS conduction band. The excited state potential of TPP
was estimated to be ꢀ0.87 V [44], which is lower than the energy
3
2
.4. Electrocatalytic reduction of O on Ru(II)PTPP/CF electrode
*
level of Ru(II)P TPP. However, the intramolecular photoinduced
A number of metal porphyrins have been considered as
potential electrocatalysts for the reduction of O [60,61]. In this
study, it is interesting to know whether Ru(II)PTPP could have the
electrocatalytic activity towards the reduction of O . To facilitate
the immobilization of Ru(II)PTPP and the mass transport of O , a
electron transfer is difficult to carry out because of weak electronic
interaction between TPP and Ru(II) polypyridyl moiety by the
2
*
ꢀ
C
4
O- covalent linking [54]. In addition, Ru(II)PTPP exhibits an
2
excited state potential of only about 0.08 V below the CdS
conduction band, leading to relatively slow electron transfer
kinetics [58].
The open-circuit photovoltage (VOCP) of Ru(II)PTPP/CdS/ITO
electrode vs. Ag/AgCl electrode is also measured by changing UA
concentration. As shown in Fig. 7, the VOCP vs. logCUA plot under a
nitrogen atmosphere exhibits a linear increase as described by
2
carbon felt (CF) sheet is chosen as the supporting substrate. While
adding a Ru(II)PTPP/CF electrode to a nitrogen-saturated buffer
solution, the cyclic voltammograms show a pair of distinct redox
ꢁ
0
peaks at E = –0.213 V (peak III), whereas no corresponding redox
response is observed for the bare CF electrode in a same potential
range (Fig. 8). While further purging with pure nitrogen or using Ru
ꢀ1
2
V
OCP,N2/V = 0.571 + 0.0289log(CUA/mmol L ) (R = 0.988), suggest-
(
II)PTPP/ITO instead of Ru(II)PTPP/CF electrode, the peak III
*
ing that Ru(II)PTPP absorbs the visible light to form Ru(II)P TPP,
which releases the electron via the CdS layer to produce Ru(III)
PTPP used to oxidize UA. Simultaneously, UA acts as sacrificial
disappears. According to the molecular structure of Ru(II)PTPP, it
is anticipated to have a large stacking among TPP, IP and CF surface,
which favors the strong binding to O
(peak III) may be ascribed to redox reactions of O
II)PTPP/CF electrode. While nitrogen is changed to the oxygen
atmosphere, the cathodic peak is largely enhanced, suggesting the
electrochemical reduction of dissolved O . It is worthy to note that
the redox peak current height of O on the Ru(II)PTPP/CF electrode
2
. Therefore, the redox peaks
[
(
F
i
g
.
_
6
)
T
D
$
F
I
G
]
2
bound to the Ru
(
2
2
is larger than that on the bare CF electrode, revealing the
electrocatalytic activity of Ru(II)PTPP towards the reduction of
O
2
. This proposition is further demonstrated by the open-circuit
voltage (VOCV) measurement. As depicted by Fig. 9, VOCV shows a
linearly positive shift in the O permeation flux rate ranged
2
ꢀ1
2
between 10 and 60 mL min (R = 0.998).
2
To throw light on the binding of Ru(II)PTPP to O , the nitrogen
atmosphere is changed to oxygen, and an interesting phenomenon
is observed. VOCP is found to linearly decrease with increasing CUA
(
Fig. 7), and the regression equation is described as VOCP,O2/
ꢀ1
2
V = 0.348–0.218(CUA/mmol L ) (R = 0.992). Combined with the
previous reported result [44], there exists the energy transfer
between photoexcited Ru(II)PTPP and molecular oxygen to
Fig. 6. Absorption spectra of Ru(II)PTPP/CdS/ITO (1), Ru(II)PTPP/ITO (2) and CdS/ITO
3) electrodes.
(