Communications
0
.086 g (70%). To obtain suitable crystals for an X-ray diffraction
structures for both singlet and triplet states. Further calculations
were made by using DFT methods with the B3LYP hybrid
study,a metathesis of the anion was performed by treating a CH Cl /
MeOH solution of the compound with an excess of NaBPh4.
Elemental analysis (%) calcd for C H N B OP Ru: C 75.86,H
2
2
[
17b]
functional
and increasing the size of the basis set from the
[
17c]
9
3
98
4
2
2
quasi-relativistic pseudo-potential LanL2DZ basis set
and the standard 6-31G* basis set
H,N,and P),used in a first round,to the 3-21 + G*
for Ru
for all the other atoms (C,
[
17d]
6
.70,N 3.80; Found: C 75.79; H 6.45,N 4.02; IR (CH Cl ): ~n = 2223
2
2
À1
31
1
[17e]
(w),2181 (s),2164 cm
(sh) (CNtBu); P{ H} NMR (121.5 MHz,
basis set
for the latter
2
2
[17f,g]
CD Cl ): d = 67.7 (d, J(P,P) = 29 Hz),41.4 ppm (d, J(P,P) = 29 Hz);
for the former and the 6-311 + + G** basis set
2
2
1
H NMR (300 MHz,CD Cl ): d = 8.0–7.4 (60H,Ph),4.01 (dd,
used in the final round. All calculated structures represent real
minima as harmonic frequencies calculated at the same levels of
theory showed no imaginary frequencies. Scaled zero-point
energies (ZPE) were added to the final electronic energies to
2
2
2
2
J(P,H) = 11, J(P,H) = 9 Hz,2H,CH 2),1.73 (s,9H,CN tBu),1.53 (s,
H,CN tBu),1.10 ppm (s,18H,CN tBu).
-[Au(Cl)(I)]: [Au(Cl)(tht)] (0.031 g,0.096 mmol) was added to a
9
7
solution of 1-I (0.050 g,0.048 mmol) in THF (12 mL) and the resulting
mixture stirred for 10 min. The solution was then concentrated to
obtain singlet–triplet splittings (DE ) and electron affinities
ST
[
17h]
(EA). Scale factor used for ZPE: 0.9804.
10] Compound 1-I was prepared from [Ru(CNtBu) {(PPh ) CH ]-
6
0
mL and let to stand over night to afford yellow crystals,yield:
[
4
2
2
2
À1
.065 g (90%). IR (CH Cl ): ~n = 2215 (s),2177 cm
(vs) (CNtBu);
2
2
(ClO ) in a similar way to that described for the synthesis of
4 2
3
1
1
1
P{ H} NMR (121.5 MHz,CD Cl ): d = 13.4 ppm; H NMR
´
[Mn(CO) {(PPh ) CI}]: J. Ruiz,V. Riera,M. Vivanco,S. Garci a-
4 2 2
2
2
(
300 MHz,CD 2Cl ): d = 7.7–7.4 (20H,Ph),1.63 (s,18H,CN
tBu),
´
2
Granda,M. R. Di az, Organometallics 1998, 17,4562.
1
.44 (s,9H,CN tBu),0.99 ppm (s,9H,CN tBu).
[
[
11] H. Keller,G. Maas,M. Regitz, Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27,1903.
12] Carbene–pyridine adducts have been spectroscopically charac-
terized and used as evidence for the formation of carbenes: J. L.
Received: June 24,2002
Revised: June 23,2003 [Z19604]
Wang,J. P. Toscano,M. S. Platz,V. Nikolaev,V. Popik,
J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,5477; J. P. Toscano,M. S. Platz,V.
Nikolaev,V. Popic, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,8146.
Keywords: carbene ligands · density functional calculations ·
P ligands · ruthenium
.
[
13] Crystal data for [3-(BF ) ] ·[(AgPy )·(BF )]·(CH Cl ) ·(H O)
4
2
2
2
4
2
2
3
2
2
(
C113H142AgB Cl F N O P Ru ): M = 2781.03,monoclinic,
5 6 20 12 2 4 2 r
space group P2 /n, a = 16.8409(1), b = 14.9234(2), c =
1
3
5
1
5
3.8328(5) , B = 93.830(1)8, V= 13499.2(2) , Z = 4, 1
.368 gcm , F(000) = 5688,Cu Ka radiation (l = 1.5418 ), m =
.134 mm ; crystal dimensions 0.42 0.17 0.27 mm. Data col-
=
calcd
[
1] For recent reviews see: a) A. J. Arduengo, Acc. Chem. Res. 1999,
2,913; b) D. Bourissou,O. Guerret,F. P. Gabbaï,G. Bertrand,
À3
3
À1
Chem. Rev. 2000, 100,39 – 91; c) W. A. Herrmann, Angew.
Chem. 2002, 114,1326; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41,1290.
lection was performed at 120(2) K on a Nonius KappaCCD
single crystal diffractometer. Crystal structure was solved by
direct methods (SHELXS-97) and refined using full-matrix least
[
2] a) R. W. Alder,P. R. Allen,M. Murray,A. G. Orpen,
Chem. 1996, 108,1211; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35,
121; b) A. J. Arduengo,J. R. Goerlich,W. J. Marshall, J. Am.
Angew.
2
squares on F (SHELXL-97). Non-hydrogen atoms were aniso-
1
tropically refined,except for some atoms on three disordered
anions and the solvent molecules. Hydrogen atoms were geo-
metrically placed and left riding on their parent atoms. Some
restrains on the disordered anions and one solvent molecule
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,11027; c) M. K. Denk,A. Thadani,K.
Hatano,A. J. Lough, Angew. Chem., 1997, 109,2719; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36,2607; d) D. Enders,K. Breuer,G.
Raabe,J. Runsink,J. H. Teles,J. Melder,K. Ebel,S. Brode,
Angew. Chem. 1995, 107,1119; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
2
2
were applied. wR (F > 2s(F )) = 0.1889,conventional R [on F
2
2
2
values for 24246 reflections] (F > 2s(F )) = 0.0695 for 1452
1
995, 34,1021 – 1023.
3] A. Igau,A. Baceiredo,G. Trinquier,G. Bertrand, Angew. Chem.
989, 101,617; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28,621. For a
parameters. Crystal data for 4-(BF4) (C H B F N P RuS):
[
2
49 64
2
8
4 2
M = 1077.73,monoclinic,space group P2 /c, a = 14.5238(5), b =
1
r
1
2
0.9879(8), c = 17.9357(6) , b = 99.508(2)8, V= 5392.1(3) 3,
review on phosphanylcarbenes see: D. Bourissou,G. Bertrand,
Adv. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 44,175.
À3
Z = 4, 1calcd = 1.328 gcm , F(000) = 2232,Cu Ka radiation (l =
1
À1
.5418 ), m = 3.816 mm
;
crystal dimensions 0.25 0.10
[
4] N. Merceron,K. Miqueu,A. Baceiredo,G. Bertrand,
J. Am.
0.10 mm. Data collection was performed at 120(2) K on a
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,6806 – 6807.
Nonius KappaCCD single crystal diffractometer. Crystal struc-
ture was solved by direct methods and refined using full-matrix
[
5] a) A. Baceiredo,A. Igau,G. Bertrand,M. J. Menu,Y. Darti-
guenave,J. J. Bonnet, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,7868; b) M.
Soleilhavoup,A. Baceiredo,G. Bertrand, Angew. Chem. 1993,
2
least squares on F . All non-hydrogen atoms were anisotropi-
cally refined. Hydrogen atoms were geometrically placed and
105,1245; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32,1167.
2
2
left riding on their parent atoms. wR2 (F > 2s(F )) = 0.2001,
[
6] a) O. Treutler,R. Ahlrichs,M. Soleilhavoup, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2
2
conventional R [on F values for 9838 reflections] (F > 2s(F )) =
.0773 for 604 parameters. Crystal data for 7-[AuICl]·THF
C H Au Cl I N OP Ru): M = 1606.69,hexagonal,space
1993, 115,8788; b) W. W. Schoeller, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000,
0
369.
(
[
[
7] M. Soleilhavoup,A. Baceiredo,O. Treutler,R. Ahlrichs,M.
49 64
2
2
2
4
2
r
Nieger,G. Bertrand, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,10959.
group P63/m, a = 28.7293(5), b = 28.7293(5), c = 14.9542(3) ,
I
3
À3
8] Similar Mn carbenes are apparently implicated in the formation
V= 10689.2(3) , Z = 6, 1calcd = 1.489 gcm , F(000) = 4596,
À1
of diphosphanylketenimines,which open routes to an unprece-
dented phosphaheterocycles chemistry: a) J. Ruiz,V. Riera,M.
Vivanco,M. Lanfranchi,A. Tiripicchio, Organometallics 1998,
CuKa radiation (l = 1.5418 ), m = 17.422 mm ; crystal dimen-
sions 0.23 0.17 0.16 mm. Data collection was performed at
120(2) K on a Nonius KappaCCD single crystal diffractometer.
Crystal structure was solved by direct methods and refined using
´
7,3835; b) J. Ruiz,F. Marqui nez,V. Riera,M. Vivanco,S.
Garcia-Granda,M. R. Di az, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112,1891;
1
2
´
´
full-matrix least squares on F . All non-hydrogen atoms were
´
anisotropically refined,except for the chlorine atom in the
counteranion which is disordered in three positions. In the
counteranion the gold atom shows positional disorder. Hydro-
gen atoms were geometrically placed and left riding on their
parent atoms. Some restrains on a phenyl group and the solvent
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39,1821; c) J. Ruiz,F. Marqui nez,V.
´
,
´
Riera,M. Vivanco,S. Garci a-Granda M. R. Diaz, Chem. Eur. J.
002, 8,3872 – 3878.
9] The calculations were performed with the Gaussian98 program
2
[
[
17a]
package.
The experimental geometry of 3 was used as a
2
2
starting point for 2b and a preliminary calculation using the HF/
LanL2DZ level of theory converged to the first optimized
molecule were applied. wR2 (F > 2s(F )) = 0.2498,conven-
2
2
tional R [on F values for 6792 reflections] (F > 2s(F )) = 0.0864
4
770
ꢀ 2003 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4767 –4771