S. Ito et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 5310–5313
5313
Table 3
Profiles of the most advanced isoindolinone analog 23
In vitro profiles
Group 1
In vivo profiles
Brain penetrabilityb
Mouse brain/plasma concd 0.45 nmol/g/0.17 lM
hmGluR1 (IC50 a
)
4.3 ± 0.66 nM
3.6 ± 0.68 nM
1500 ± 170 nM
a
a
hmGluR1 (IC50
hmGluR5 (IC50
)
)
Pharmacokineticsc
Group 2
Rat F: 46%, T1/2 0.7 h, CLp: 20 mL/min/kg
hmGluR2 (IC50)a >10,000 nM
Group 3
Efficacyd
hmGluR8 (IC50)a >10,000 nM
Rat PPI disruption model MED 1 mg/kg, po
Adverse effectd
Quisqualic acid binding site (IC50) >10,000 nM
Rat catalepsy. No effects 30 mg/kg, po
a
b
c
The IC50 value is the mean of multiple results (at least three independent determinations performed in duplicate) with standard error of the means.
At 30 min after oral administration (1 mg/kg).
The oral dose was 1 mg/kg and the IV dose 0.3 mg/kg.
Ref. 8.
d
optimum value for oral CNS drugs,13 and also good metabolic sta-
bility. We promptly replaced the fluoropyridine part of the potent
compounds with promising benzene substructures, which were
well investigated in the tetrahydropyridine prototype lead class.
Among the combined compounds, we finally identified com-
pound 23 as a candidate for further development (Table 3). Com-
pound 23 had a 2,4-difluorobenzene at the triazole N part in the
molecule and its log D7.4 value was 3.1. GSH adducts were not ob-
served at all in rat hepatocytes incubation. In vitro mGluR1 antag-
onistic activities for human and rat were 4.3 and 3.6 nM,
respectively, and there were no species differences. Selectivity for
other mGluRs was sufficient and it did not have any affinity for
the quisqualic binding site, which meant that it is an allosteric
antagonist. In terms of the in vivo DMPK profile, following an oral
dose of 1 mg/kg of compound 23, the mean (n = 3) plasma and
activity, and also an improved PK profile in rats. Moreover, it also
demonstrated an antipsychotic-like effect in an animal model.
The other isoindolinone derivatives 19–22 with a fluoropyridine
part also have quite potent mGluR1 antagonistic activity and in-
creased hydrophilic profiles and would be suitable for develop-
ment of a PET tracer to examine the in vivo pharmacodynamics
of mGluR1 antagonists. These isoindolinone derivatives would
have great potential for the elucidation of the functions of mGluR1
in humans.
1
8
References and notes
1.
Swanson, C. J.; Bures, M.; Johnson, M. P.; Linden, A. M.; Monn, J. A.; Schoepp, D.
D. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2005, 4, 131.
2
3
4
.
.
.
Kew, J. N. C. Pharmacol. Ther. 2004, 104, 233.
Marek, G. Curr. Med. Chem.-Cent. Nerv. Syst. Agents 2002, 2, 29.
Marino, M. J.; Conn, P. J. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2006, 6, 98.
brain concentrations in mice were 0.17
lM and 0.45 nmol/g at
3
0 min post-dose, respectively. The brain level of the compound
5. Kohara, A.; Takahashi, M.; Yatsugi, S. I.; Tamura, S.; Shitaka, Y.; Hayashibe, S.;
Kawabata, S.; Okada, M. Brain Res. 2008, 1191, 168.
after oral administration seemed to be good enough to elicit
in vivo efficacy given its great in vitro intrinsic potency. In addition,
it maintained an acceptable oral bioavailability in rats (46%).
To reiterate, we previously demonstrated that blockage of
mGluR1 mimics some effects of antipsychotics. Compound 1 inhib-
ited psychostimulant methamphetamine (MAP)-induced behav-
ioral alterations such as hyperlocomotion and disruption of
6
7
.
.
Schkeryantz, J. M.; Kingston, A. E.; Johnson, M. P. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 2563.
Suzuki, G.; Kimura, T.; Satow, A.; Kaneko, N.; Fukuda, J.; Hikichi, H.; Sakai, N.;
Maehara, S.; Kawagoe-Takaki, H.; Hata, M.; Azuma, T.; Ito, S.; Kawamoto, H.;
Ohta, H. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2007, 321, 1144.
8.
Satow, A.; Maehara, S.; Ise, S.; Hikichi, H.; Fukushima, M.; Suzuki, G.; Kimura,
T.; Tanaka, T.; Ito, S.; Kawamoto, H.; Ohta, H. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008, 326,
577.
9. Ito, S.; Satoh, A.; Nagatomi, Y.; Hirata, Y.; Suzuki, G.; Kimura, T.; Satow, A.;
Maehara, S.; Hikichi, H.; Hata, M.; Kawamoto, H.; Ohta, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
prepulse inhibition (PPI) at intraperitoneal doses of 10 and
2008, 16, 9817.
8
3
0 mg/kg. We next tested the developed compound 23 in PPI as-
10. Sakamoto, T.; Uchiyama, D.; Kondo, Y.; Yamanaka, H. Heterocycles 1993, 35,
1273.
say system to confirm its potential for the development of an orally
available antipsychotic. As a result, an antipsychotic-like effect was
observed from an oral dose of 1 mg/kg in rats. On the other hand,
we previously examined haloperidol, a typical marketed antipsy-
chotic, in this PPI efficacy model and a catalepsy adverse effect
model in rats. The minimum effective dose of the efficacy is
1
1. Grey, J.; Dyck, B.; Rowbottom, M. W.; Tamiya, J.; Vickers, T. D.; Zhang, M.; Zhao,
L.; Heise, C. E.; Schwarz, D.; Saunders, J.; Goodfellow, V. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2005, 15, 999.
12. Almansa, R. C.; Virgili, B. M. WO 2007000337, 2006; Chem. Abstr. 2006, 146,
21696.
1
1
3. John, E. A. C. In Drug Bioavailability: Estimation of Solubility, Permeability,
Absorption and Bioavailability; van de Waterbeemd, H., Lehhemas, H.,
Artursson, P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany; p 23.
0
.03 mg/kg and the catalepsy was observed at a dose of 0.3 mg/
14. Dohta, Y.; Yamashita, T.; Horiike, S.; Nakamura, T.; Fukami, T. Anal. Chem. 2007,
kg by subcutaneous injections of haloperidol. Compound 23 at up
to 30 mg/kg did not cause any catalepsy and there was an over
7
9, 8312.
1
5. Lévesque, J. F.; Day, S. H.; Chauret, N.; Seto, C.; Trimble, L.; Bateman, K. P.; Silva,
J. M.; Berthelette, C.; Lachance, N.; Boyd, M.; Li, L.; Sturino, C. F.; Wang, Z.;
Zamboni, R.; Young, R. N.; Nicoll-Griffith, D. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17,
3
0-fold window. These results suggest that potent mGluR1 alloste-
ric antagonist 23 is an attractive lead to go into pre-clinical phase
as a novel antipsychotic.
3038.
1
6. Kumar, S.; Kassahun, K.; Tschirret-Guth, R. A.; Mitra, K.; Baillie, T. A. Curr. Opin.
In summary, a series of 5-(1-aryl-3-methyl-1,2,3-triazole-4-yl)
isoindolin-1-one derivatives were rapidly screened for a developed
allosteric mGluR1 antagonist by using both library and conven-
tional medicinal chemistry techniques. Representative compound
Drug Disc. Dev. 2008, 11, 43.
17. Untrecht, J. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007, 47, 513.
1
1
8. Analytical data of 23: H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d: 1.33 (6H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 2.45
(
(
3H, d, J = 1.7 Hz), 4.43 (2H, s), 4.72 (1H, sept.), 7.03–7.18 (2H, m), 7.52–7.62
1H, m), 7.80 (1H, dd, J = 7.8, 1.2 Hz), 7.95 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 8.00 (1H, s). MS
+
+
2
3 has quite potent mGluR1 antagonistic activity, low off-target
(ESI ): m/z 369.1 [M+H] .