Scheme 1
Scheme 2a
backbone. The epoxide group in the desired targets can be
installed at a late stage in the synthesis from the correspond-
ing dienone by taking advantage of peripheral epoxidation
to set the relative stereochemistry of this moiety.6 Examina-
tion of molecular models of potential intermediates suggested
that of the two enone double bonds the required one would
be more reactive to a nucleophilic epoxidizing agent due to
its greater degree of conjugation with the ketone carbonyl.
Two methods were conceived for the synthesis of the
macrocycle. In one case, intramolecular acetylide addition
to the unsaturated aldehyde of intermediate 5,7 formed
regioselectively via the kinetic enolate of ketone 6, would
produce the required 12-membered ring. Conjugate addition
of the cuprate of enyne 88 to known enone 79 was predicted
to give ketone 6 (X ) H) with good diastereoselectivity.
For the real system, the expectation was that the enolate
formed upon cuprate addition would be intercepted by a
suitable electrophile (cf. 6, X ) CH2OP) to introduce the
one-carbon unit required for the natural products.10 In the
second case, ketone 6 would again be a key intermediate,
but the ring closure would be achieved by a carbonylative
coupling reaction (vide infra). The goal of the initial study3
was to validate the overall strategy through the synthesis of
a compound bearing the desformylphomactin carbon skel-
eton.
a (a) AlMe3, Cp2ZrCl2, Cl(C2H4)Cl; then I2; (b) TBSCl, DMAP,
imidazole, CH2Cl2; (c) n-BuLi, TMSCl, THF; (d) 2M HCl; (e) PPh3,
imidazole, I2, CH2Cl2; (f) 10, Rieke zinc, THF; 9, Pd(PPh3)4; (g)
H2O, AcOH, THF; (h) t-BuLi, Et2O; Cu(C5H7), PBu3; add 7; (i)
LDA, THF; Comins’ triflimide; (j) TBAF, THF; (k) n-BuLi, Et2O;
Me3SnCl; (l) PdCl2dppf‚CH2Cl2, LiCl, CO, DMF.
mmol scale in high overall yield. Hydrolysis of the TBS ether
followed by conversion of the hydroxyl to an iodide produced
8 in 67% overall yield from 9. Iodine-lithium exchange
followed by addition of a solution of copper pentynylide12
gave a mixed cuprate that was treated with 7 at -78 °C.
The solution was then allowed to warm gradually to -25
°C and upon workup afforded the desired addition product,
ketone 13, in 88% yield as a 13:1 mixture of diastereomers.
This reaction is noteworthy in that the cuprate derived from
iodide 8 was not used in excess, as is often the case, but
was used in a 1:1 ratio with enone 7. Kinetic deprotonation
followed by trapping of the regioselectively formed enolate
with Comins’ reagent afforded enol triflate 14 (ca. 9:1 ratio),
poised for assembling the macrocyclic ring.13
A direct route from triflate 14 to the phomactin macrocycle
was through a carbonylative cyclization.14,15 To that end, the
trimethylsilyl group was exchanged for a trimethylstannyl
under standard conditions.16 We were gratified to find that
stannyl triflate 16 underwent the desired transformation upon
heating in a Fischer-Porter bottle under a CO atmosphere
in the presence of a Pd catalyst. Although the yield of this
reaction must be optimized further, it represents a powerful
strategic construct for the phomactin skeleton, accomplishing
As shown in Scheme 2, iodide 8 was prepared from two
butyn-1-ol-derived units using a slight modification of
Negishi’s method. Upon treatment with Rieke zinc,11 iodide
10 was converted to the corresponding organozinc, which
was coupled with vinyl iodide 9 using Pd catalysis. This
coupling protocol has been carried out reliably on a >20
(6) This concept was elegantly demonstrated in the synthesis of peripl-
anone B: Still, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 2493-2495.
(7) (a) Danishefsky, S. J.; Mantlo, N. B.; Yamashita, B. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988, 110, 6890-6891. (b) Kende, A. S.; Smith, C. A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1988, 34, 4217-4220.
(8) Rand, C. L.; Van Horn, D. E.; Moore, M. W.; Negishi, E. I. J. Org.
Chem. 1981, 46, 4093-4096.
(9) Compound 7 was prepared according to the general method of Braude
et al.: Braude, E. A.; Webb, A. A.; Sultanbawa, M. U. S. J. Chem. Soc.
1958, 3328-3336.
(12) Corey, E. J.; Beames, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 7210-
7211.
(13) Comins, D. L.; Dehghani, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6299-
6302.
(14) (a) Crisp, G. T.; Scott, W. J.; Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984,
106, 7500-7506. (b) Gyorkos, A. C.; Stille, J. K.; Hegedus, L. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8465-8472.
(10) A recent report clearly supports the feasibility of such a transforma-
tion: Laval, G.; Audran, G.; Galano, J.-M.; Monti, H. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 3551-3554.
(11) Zhu, L.; Wehmeyer, R. M.; Rieke, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
1445-1453.
3616
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 23, 2001