Journal of
10
GUO ET AL.
MASS
SPECTROMETRY
Given the relatively short time period of 24 hours after
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
thermoembolization and before euthanasia, the full extent of tissue
damage and the immune response resulting from thermoembolization
is not expected to be apparent in these samples. At 24 hours after
thermoembolization, a robust infiltrate of neutrophils is present at
the periphery of the severely injured zone and represents a host
response to the nucleic acids, proteins, and ATP released during
necrosis. The release of cellular contents serves as damage‐associated
molecular patterns or “danger signals” to the host that result in the ini-
tiation of a noninfectious inflammatory response.22,23 The neutrophils
attracted to the embolization site help create a sterile proinflammatory
environment into which it would be expected that classically activated
(M1) macrophages or Kupffer cells will be recruited. In addition, in an
incompletely ablated tumor, the inflammatory response initiated by
embolization might be able to reprogram tumor‐associated alterna-
tively activated (M2) macrophages to a proinflammatory phenotype
and thus carry out tumoricidal activities and initiate an adaptive
immune response.24,25
This work was supported by NIH 1R01CA201127‐01A1, MD Ander-
son Cancer Center Institutional Research Grant program, NIH CCSG
P30 CA016672, and The James B. and Lois R. Archer Foundation,
the E.L. Wiegand Foundation, and the J.S. Dunn Foundation. The
authors thank Amanda McWatters and Katherine Dixon for technical
and administrative support and the personnel in the Department of
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery for animal care and histologic
processing.
ORCID
REFERENCES
1. Kulik L, El‐Serag HB. Epidemiology and management of hepatocellular
carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:477‐491.
2. Rimassa L, Santoro A. Sorafenib therapy in advanced hepatocellular
carcinoma: the SHARP trial. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther.
2009;9:739‐745.
The discussion up to this point has centered on aqueous hydroly-
sis of the acid chloride to produce the carboxylic acid. However, other
possibilities exist. The large relative amount of water (ie, high concen-
tration) as an available nucleophile compared with other compounds
argues strongly for water being the most likely partner in reaction
with an electrophile, but water is not the only possible reaction part-
ner. Given the plethora of hydroxyl groups on carbohydrates and gly-
coproteins, and the free hydroxyls on serine, threonine, and tyrosine
in proteins for example, any of these could in principle function as
alternate nucleophiles. Nitrogen and sulfur also cannot be excluded.
Reaction in such instances would yield covalent modification much
the same as many standard labeling or derivatization techniques.
However, one can speculate that such changes would almost certainly
be indiscriminate and could change and indeed possibly alter or elim-
inate crucial functions of proteins. Even without considering perturba-
tion of function from covalent bond formation, an equivalent of HCl is
still formed, and substantial energy is released in such a situation.
These factors would likely still cause local denaturation. Experimental
validation of the question would likely require enzymatic techniques
such as tryptic digestion26 or PNGase F for glycan fragments27 that
are beyond the scope of the current work.
3. Llovet JM, Montal R, Sia D, Finn RS. Molecular therapies and precision
medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncol-
ogy. 2018;15:599‐616.
4. Worns MA, Weinmann A, Pfingst K, et al. Safety and efficacy of soraf-
enib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in
consideration of concomitant stage of liver cirrhosis. J. Clin.
Gastroenterol. 2009;43:489‐495.
5. El‐Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T, et al. Nivolumab in patients with
advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open‐label,
non‐comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lan-
cet. 2017;389:2492‐2502.
6. Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and manage-
ment of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology.
2018;68:723‐750.
7. de Baere T, Arai Y, Lencioni R, et al. Treatment of liver tumors with
lipiodol TACE: technical recommendations from experts opinion.
Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2016;39:334‐343.
8. Marin HL, Furth EE, Olthoff K, Shaked A, Soulen MC. Histopathologic
outcome of neoadjuvant image‐guided therapy of hepatocellular carci-
noma. J. Gastrointestin. Liver Dis. 2009;18:169‐176.
9. Cressman E, Guo C. Feasibility study using tissue as reagent for cancer
therapy: endovascular ablation via thermochemistry. Convergent Sci-
The present study does have limitations. A relatively short time
passed prior to euthanasia as noted above, MSI data are from a
small number of animals at a single time point, and the method
was tested in normal rather than tumor tissue. Future work will
address these issues. Putative biomarkers of ischemia will need more
rigorous characterization and confirmation. In addition, although
neutral lipids are more challenging to analyze with MSI, confirmation
of the location of the ethiodized oil, not identified in the current
data, would also strengthen the findings. Finally, work remains to
determine why hepatocyte injury and apoptosis was present at loca-
tions remote from where the coagulation zones where iodide was
detected. In conclusion, MSI can demonstrate the spatial distribution
of thermoembolization by‐products and provides unique insights
with regard to metabolism.
10. Cressman ENK, Guo C, Karbasian N. Image‐guided chemistry altering
biology: an in vivo study of thermoembolization. PLoS One. 2018;13:
e0200471.
11. Chaurand P, Schwartz SA, Billheimer D, Xu BJ, Crecelius A, Caprioli
RM. Integrating histology and imaging mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.
2004;76:1145‐1155.
12. McDonnell LA, Heeren RM. Imaging mass spectrometry. Mass
Spectrom. Rev. 2007;26:606‐643.
13. Reyzer ML, Hsieh Y, Ng K, Korfmacher WA, Caprioli RM. Direct analy-
sis of drug candidates in tissue by matrix‐assisted laser
desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom.
2003;38:1081‐1092.