Organic Letters
Letter
a
ketones catalyzed by a combination of a Ni/electron-rich N-
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
heterocyclic carbene ligand (Scheme 1a).9e Maiti’s group
Scheme 1. Previous Studies and This Work on C−C Bond
Activation
b
oxidant
(Y equiv)
yield of 3aa/
3aa′ (%)
entry acid (X equiv)
solvent/atm
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BF3·OEt2 (2.0)
BF3·OEt2 (2.0)
BF3·OEt2 (2.0)
BF3·OEt2 (2.0)
BF3·OEt2 (2.0)
BF3·OEt2 (2.0)
BF3·OEt2 (2.0)
DMSO
24/62
57/20
60/0
50/0
15/43
85/0
58/0
ND
18/0
10/0
50/0
0/82
c
DMSO/O2
DMSO/O2
DMSO/O2
d
e
TBHP(2.0)
DTBP (2.0)
K2S2O8 (2.0) DMSO/O2
f
PIDA (0.6)
PIFA (0.6)
PIDA (0.6)
DMSO/O2
DMSO/O2
DMSO/O2
DMSO/O2
DMSO/O2
DMF/O2
g
h
acetic acid (1.0) PIDA (0.6)
10
11
12
Sc(OTf)3 (0.3)
BF3·OEt2 (2.0)
BF3·OEt2 (2.0)
PIDA (0.6)
PIDA (0.6)
PIDA (0.6)
i
DMSO/O2
a
All reactions were performed using 1a (0.5 mmol, 1 equiv), 2a (0.6
developed an imine-directed copper-catalyzed rearrangement
reaction to synthesize symmetrical and unsymmetrical diaryl
ketones (Scheme 1b).9f In this series, we disclosed a transition-
metal-free and directing-group-free cascade C(sp2)−C(sp2)
bond cleavage and new intramolecular C(sp2)−C(sp2) bond-
forming reactions to synthesize dihydrobenzo[c]acridine and
bis(heteroaryl) ketones with the generation of CO and CO2 as
traceless byproducts. To the best of our knowledge, this is the
first report of an in situ generated carbonyl group undergoing
BF3·OEt2- or TfOH-mediated decarbonylative C−C bond
activation to synthesize an acridine scaffold via dearomatiza-
tion/aromatization reaction sequences. The PMA-PdCl2 test
confirmed the CO gas liberation in the reaction medium. Our
environmentally friendly protocol can replace benchmark
expensive noble metals in unstrained C−C bond activation
reactions using abundant and low-cost acids.
Initially, our transition-metal-free decarbonylation reaction
was studied using 2-(p-tolylethynyl) aniline (1a) and α-
tetralone (2a) as model substrates (Table 1). Both starting
materials were treated in the presence of BF3·OEt2 using
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as the solvent at 110 °C. This
reaction yielded 24% of the dihydrobenzo[c]acridine product
3aa (entry 1, Table 1, closed vial). When we performed the
same reaction under an oxygen atmosphere, we observed a two
fold improvement in the reaction yield (entry 2, Table 1).
Therefore, a strong oxidant may be a necessary part of the
reaction conditions to improve the yields. Next, we screened
several different oxidants with the reaction conditions to
determine the optimal oxidizing source (entries 3−7, Table 1).
The highest yield (i.e., 85%) was obtained in the presence of
0.6 equiv of (diacetoxyiodo)benzene (PIDA) (entry 6, Table
1). Furthermore, changing the acid source in the reaction
conditions did not improve the yield (entries 9 & 10, Table 1
acid source the reaction did not proceed (entry 8 Table 1). The
role of the solvent in these C−C bond activation reactions is
crucial, because a high yield was only obtained when polar
S1). Moreover, the DMSO played a dual role as both an
oxidant and a solvent.10 The low-temperature reaction failed to
furnish the decarbonylated product (entry 12).
mmol, 1.5 equiv), acid (X equiv), oxidant (Y equiv), and solvent (2
mL) at 110 °C stirring with the indicated atmosphere for 16 h unless
b
c
otherwise noted. Isolated yield. Reaction performed under oxygen
d
e
atmosphere. 70% aq TBHP was used. Di-tert-butyl-peroxide
(DTBP). (Diacetoxy iodo)benzene (PIDA). (Bis(trifluoroacetoxy)-
iodo)benzene (PIFA). Reaction performed without BF3·OEt2.
Reaction performed at 65 °C.
f
g
h
i
The success of our optimized reaction conditions was
demonstrated by synthesizing a library of acridine derivatives.
Both the electron-rich and electron-poor o-alkynylanilines
(1a−1d) were transformed into corresponding heterocyclic
compounds 3aa−3da with 48−85% yields (Scheme 2).19 The
o-alkynylanilines containing the 3-Me (1e) and 3,4-di-Me (1f)
functional groups underwent the reaction using our optimized
reaction conditions to afford desired products 3ea (68%) and
3fa (88%). Next, we explored the reaction efficiency with
different R1-substituted starting materials (1g−1i). In general,
the R1 group with meta-substituted o-alkynylanilines (3ga and
3ha) afforded lower yields compared to the para-substituted
one (3ia). Furthermore, the α-tetralones (2b−2j) reactivity
was examined with simple o-alkynylaniline (1a). In all these
reactions, dihydrobenzo[c]acridines were isolated in good to
moderate yield (3ab−3ai, 48−87%). 2,3-Dihydro-1H-inden-1-
one (2j) was not compatible under our reaction conditions
(3aj, Scheme 2).
When similar reaction conditions were employed with simple
o-alkynylanilines (1j), a lower yield was obtained, and a major
cyclized intermediate 3ja′ as well as oxidized intermediate 3ja″
were isolated (see Scheme 7b,c). This unsatisfactory result may
be due to coordination of the current Lewis acid, which is too
weak, to the in situ formed carbonyl group to achieve the
dearomatization step. Therefore, we screened the reaction with
a diverse array of Lewis acids and Brønsted acids (Supporting
aniline (1j) and α-tetralone (2a) reacted in the presence of 1
equiv of TfOH to afford the highest yield (i.e., 78%) for the
acridine derivative (3ja) (Scheme 3). Similarly, the 4-Me (3ka)
substituted dihydrobenzo[c]acridine was also prepared in 71%
yield. Next, the substrate scope was expanded with different
electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups bearing α-
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX