2
YAMAGUCHI AND YAMAJI
Me N‐OPP(3)‐OH with electron‐donating dimethylamino
gel column chromatography (eluent = chloroform). The sol-
vent was removed by evaporation and a resulting solid was
2
group and O N‐OPP(3)‐OH with electron–withdrawing
2
nitro group were synthesized via the Suzuki coupling reac-
tion. Furthermore, the presence of a π‐deficient pyridine ring
dried in vacuo to give Me N‐OPP(3)‐OH as a light brown
2
1
powder (0.13 g, 23%). H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‐d ): δ
6
(
Py) in Py‐OPP(2)‐OH would affect its optical properties
9.51 (s, 1H), 7.63 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.4 Hz,
2H), 7.55 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H),
6.85 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 2.94 (s,
because the charge shift from the sodium phenoxide groups
to the adjacent rings depends on the electronic properties of
the accepting site. Elucidation of the substitution (R) effect
on the chemical properties of R‐OPP‐OH may afford funda-
mental information for the synthesis of functional OPPs.
Additionally, elucidation of the optical properties of Me N‐
OPP(3)‐OH, O N‐OPP(3)‐OH, and Py‐OPP(2)‐OH before
and after the deprotonation of the OH groups will lead to a
better understanding of the intramolecular charge shift in
the π‐conjugated oligoarylenes and toward the development
of new functional materials.
13
3H). C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO‐d ): δ 157.0, 149.8,
6
138.2, 137.7, 130.6, 127.4, 127.2, 126.9, 126.3, 125.8,
−1
115.7, 112.7. IR (KBr, cm ): 3398 (OH), 3033, 2923,
2854, 2804, 1610, 1540, 1493, 1356, 1256, 1200, 809. Anal
2
calcd. for C H NO: C, 83.01; H, 6.62; N, 4.84. Found: C,
2
20 19
82.74; H, 6.85; N, 4.63.
2
.3 | Synthesis of Py‐OPP(3)‐OH
Herein, we report the synthesis of Me N‐OPP(3)‐OH,
2
Py‐OPP(2)‐OH was synthesized by the reaction of 4‐
pyridineboronic acid with 4‐bromo‐4′‐hydroxybiphenyl by
O N‐OPP(3)‐OH, and Py‐OPP(2)‐OH as well as their
optical and electrochemical properties before and after the
deprotonation of the OH groups.
2
the procedure that used for the synthesis of Me N‐OPP(3)‐
2
1
OH. Yield = 12%. H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO‐d ): δ 9.74
6
(s, 1H), 8.77 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 8.05 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H),
7
.97 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d,
2
2
|
EXPERIMENTAL
13
J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H). C NMR
(125 MHz, DMSO‐d ): δ 157.8, 150.1, 146.9, 142.0, 133.6,
6
.1 | General
−
1
129.6, 127.9, 127.8, 126.7, 121.9, 115.9. IR (KBr, cm ):
3076, 2800, 2679, 2617, 1634, 1601, 1489, 1278, 1223,
1177, 1100, 810. Anal calcd. for C H NO: C, 82.57; H,
5
Solvents were dried, distilled, and stored under nitrogen.
Reagents were purchased and used without further purifica-
tion. Reactions were conducted with standard Schlenk tech-
niques under nitrogen.
17 13
.30; N, 5.66. Found: C, 82.29; H, 5.54; N, 5.38.
IR and NMR spectra were recorded on a JASCO FT/IR‐
60 PLUS spectrophotometer and a JEOL AL‐400 spectrom-
6
2
.4 | Synthesis of O N‐OPP(3)‐OH
2
eter, respectively. Elemental analysis was performed on a
Yanagimoto MT‐5 CHN corder. UV‐vis and PL spectra were
obtained by a JASCO V‐560 spectrometer and a JASCO
FP‐6200 spectrofluorometer, respectively. Quantum yields
were calculated by using a diluted ethanol solution of 7‐
diethylamino‐4‐methylcoumarin (Φ = 0.50) as the stan-
Pd(PPh ) (0.045 g, 0.039 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of
dry THF under N . 4‐Nitrophenylboronic acid (0.50 g,
3
4
2
3
.0 mmol), 4‐bromo‐4′‐hydroxybiphenyl (0.50 g, 2.0 mmol),
K CO (aq) (2.0 M, 20 mL; N bubbled before use), and
2
3
2
three drops of aliquat336 were added to the solution. After
the mixture was refluxed for 158 h, the solvent was removed
under vacuum. The resulting solid was washed with water
and HCl(aq) (1.0 M, 40 mL) and dried under vacuum to give
a light brown solid, which was washed with acetone for
[
16]
1
dard. The solutions for the H NMR, UV‐vis, and PL mea-
surements of Me N‐OPP(3)‐ONa, O N‐OPP(3)‐ONa, and
2
2
Py‐OPP(3)‐ONa were prepared by treating Me N‐OPP(3)‐
2
OH, O N‐OPP(3)‐OH, and Py‐OPP(3)‐OH with an excess
2
3
0 sec and purified by silica gel column chromatography
amount of NaH under nitrogen. Cyclic voltammetry was per-
(eluent = chloroform). The solvent was removed by
formed with a Hokuto Denko HSV‐110.
evaporation and a resulting solid was dried in vacuo to
give O N‐OPP(3)‐OH as a yeloow powder (0.44 g, 79%).
2
2
.2 | Synthesis of Me N‐OPP(3)‐OH
1
2
H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO‐d ): δ 9.65 (s, 1H), 8.32
6
Pd(PPh ) (0.066 g, 0.057 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of
(d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 8.02 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.86
3
4
dry THF under N . 4‐Dimethylaminophenylboronic acid
(d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.59
(d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.88 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H). C NMR
2
1
3
(0.50 g, 3.0 mmol), 4‐bromo‐4′‐hydroxybiphenyl (0.50 g,
2
.0 mmol), K CO (aq) (2.0 M, 20 mL; N bubbled before
(125 MHz, DMSO‐d ): δ 157.6, 146.5, 146.2, 140.8,
2
3
2
6
use), and three drops of aliquat336 were added to the solu-
tion. After the mixture was refluxed for 113 h, the solvent
was removed under vacuum. The resulting solid was washed
with water and HCl(aq) (1.0 M, 40 mL) and dried under vac-
uum to give a light brown solid, which was purified by silica
135.1, 129.8, 127.8, 127.7, 127.5, 126.6, 124.1, 115.8. IR
−
1
(KBr, cm ): 3430 (OH), 3033, 2924, 2853, 1593, 1506,
1346, 1333, 1268, 1191, 1111, 822. Anal calcd. for
C H NO : C, 74.22; H, 4.50; N, 4.81. Found: C, 74.01;
18
13
3
H, 4.63; N, 4.68.