D.E. Jenkins, Z. Assefa / Journal of Molecular Structure 1133 (2017) 374e383
375
ray crystal structure of silver complexes with the same ligand [18]
and interesting geometries around the metal ions were observed.
The ligand is thought to offer stability for metal e metal interactions
including the lighter group 11 metals that possess the same abilities
to coordinate two or more metal atoms in close proximity to each
other. Rigid ligands such as dmpp are found to constrain the metal-
Schlenk flask containing 100 mL THF was added a 6.6085 g
(50 mmol) of 1-methylbenzimidazole. The solution was stirred
ꢀ
until the solid has dissolved and cooled to ꢁ78 C in acetone/dry ice
bath. To this solution 31.25 mL (50 mmol) of n-BuLi was added
slowly while stirring for 1 h. Then 9 mL (50 mmol) of chlor-
odiphenylphosphine was added drop-wise. The solution was
allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 3 h. The
solvent was then evacuated by vacuum suction to yield an orange
2 2 4 2
metal separation, and [dmpp Au ](BF ) was found to have an
AueAu separation of only 2.776 Å [28]. More recently, Ag(I) com-
plexes of similar ligands have been shown to exhibit argentophillic
bonding analogous to the Au(I) systems [29]. A number of other
interesting structures consisting of Cu(I) and Ag(I) metal ions with
N, P ligands have been characterized [15e18,30e33]. These com-
pounds also have interesting luminescent properties, hence further
supporting the desire for using this type of ligand.
foamy product. To this solution Et
was added and the organic layer collected. The Et
2
O and then H
2
O (50 mL each)
O was removed
2
under vacuum to produce an oily product. The product was soni-
cated for 10 min in warm hexanes. A cloudy layer was then formed,
collected, and allowed to cool. X-ray quality crystals were pro-
31
1
duced. P{ H} NMR -25.6 ppm with phosphoric acid standard.
In this manuscript we report the coordination of the methyl
benzimidazolediphenyl phosphine (MBDP) ligand to an Au(I) cen-
ter and compare the structural feature with that of Ag(I) complexes.
The structural analysis and luminescence studies are compared for
the two types of complexes as well as results from theoretical DFT
calculations reported.
2.4. Preparation of (MBDP)Au(I) chloride (1)
To a 25 mL round-bottom flask a 0.064 g (0.20 mmol) (tht)AuCl
was dissolved in 10 mL THF. To this solution a 0.064 g (0.20 mmol)
of the ligand was added and allowed to stir for 3 h. The solution was
concentrated under high pressure vacuum to approximately 3 mL
2
. Experimental
then layered with Et
night and x-ray quality crystals were formed. H NMR in CDCl
(ppm); 3.98 (s, 1H), 7.33e7.54 (m, 5H), 7.58e7.60 (m, 6H), and
2
O. The flask was placed in the freezer over-
1
3
2.1. Materials and methods
31
1
7.70e7.83 (m, 5H). The P{ H} NMR 14.59 (s).
Methylbenzimidazole, n-butyllithium (nBuLi), and chlor-
odiphenylphosphine (PPh
2
Cl) were commercially available from
2.5. Preparation of [(MBDP) Au ](CH CN)(BF ) (2)
2
2
3
4 2
the Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. The (tht)
Au(I) chloride (tht ¼ tetrahydrothiophene) was prepared and pu-
rified following the methods of Uson and coworkers [34]. All of the
solvents used including tetrahydrofuran (THF), acetonitrile
In a 25 mL round-bottom flask, a 0.064 g (0.20 mmol) of (tht)
AuCl was dissolved in 10 mL CH CN. A 0.040 g (0.20 mmol) of AgBF
3
4
was added to the flask and stirred for 5 min. A white precipitate
®
(
CH
3
CN), dichloromethane (DCM), diethyl ether (Et
2
O), chloroform
formed, which was filtered through a pad of Celite . To the filtrate,
(
CHCl
3
), and hexanes were degassed using a N purge.
2
the ligand MBDP (0.064 g, 0.20 mmol) was added and allowed to
stir for 3 h. The solution was concentrated under vacuum to
2.2. Physical measurements
approximately 3 mL. The solution was then layered with Et
2
O and
placed in a freezer. X-ray quality crystals were obtained after 4 days.
The infrared (IR) spectra were collected using potassium bro-
mide (KBr) pellets on a Shimadzu IRPrestige21 Fourier-Transform
2 2 3 4 4 2
2.6. Preparation of [(MBDP) Ag (CH CN) ](BF ) (3)
ꢁ1
infrared spectrophotometer, over the range 4000e400 cm
.
ꢁ1
Spectra were collected at 64 scans and a resolution of 1 cm . The
ultraviolet and visible (UVeVis) spectra were collected using a
Shimadzu UV-2401PC UVeVis spectrometer. The photo-
luminescence (PL) data were collected using a Photon Technology
International (PTI) spectrometer model QM-7/SE, equipped with a
Hamamatsu R928P photomultiplier tube with corning filters.
Excitation and emission spectra obtained at room temperature and
at 77 K with liquid nitrogen filled in the cold-finger dewar flask. The
instrument operation, data collection, and handling were all
controlled using the advanced FeliX32 software. Selection of exci-
tation and emission wavelengths are conducted by means of
computer controlled autocalibrated “QuadraScopic” mono-
chromators that are equipped with aberration corrected emission
and excitation optics.
The silver(I) tetrafluoroborate complex 3 with the MBDP ligand
(1:1 M ratio) was prepared in a 25 mL round-bottom flask covered
with aluminum foil. A 0.0397 g AgBF
4
(0.20 mmol) was dissolved in
10 mL CH CN and to this solution MBDP ligand (0.0637 g,
3
0.20 mmol) was added and allowed to stir for 3 h. The solution was
concentrated under vacuum to approximately 3 mL. The partial
removal of the solvent was followed by layering with Et O. The flask
2
was then placed in the refrigerator, where X-ray quality crystals
were formed after 4 days.
2.7. X-ray crystallography
X-ray data were collected using a Bruker AXS SMART X2S sys-
tem based diffractometer equipped with a CCD 485 Breeze detector
and a Ricor K535 power supply unit. A suitable crystal was chosen
and mounted on a pin using a micro-mount needle from Bruker
Corporation using Paratone-N oil purchased from Hampton
Research. The diffraction data for the determination of the crystal
structures were collected on CD-R using the Bruker CCD 485 Breeze
detector for cell refinement, and data reduction with Apex2 and X-
SHELL. For structural display, report and visualization the Mercury
software version 3.5.1 from CCDC 2001e2014 was used. The
structures were solved using the Apex 2 series of software program
from Bruker and by direct methods. The XSHELL program(s) was
used to refine the structures, while molecular graphics were done
using the APEX2 software.
The proton ( H) and phosphorus (31P) nuclear magnetic reso-
1
nance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a 300 MHz Varian NMR
3
00e411149 FT-NMR spectrometer. Chemical shifts (
d ppm) were
reported relative to an internal standard, tetramethylsilane (TMS)
1
for H, while 85% phosphoric acid (H
standard for the 31P NMR in CDCl
3 4
PO ) was used as an external
3
2.3. Synthesis of 1-methylbenzimidazole diphenylphosphine
(
MBDP)
The MBDP ligand was synthesized following a modified pro-
cedure of the previously reported scheme [35,37]. In a 250 mL