C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. E Values after Definite Times in Probe Mixing Assaya
after 24 h), despite the formation of a large amount of 6a (87%),
indicating, as one would expect, that membrane stability is very
sensitive to the chemical structure of the composite lipids. Several
reports concerning dynamic morphological changes of a molecular
assembly induced by chemical reaction of lipids have appeared in
the literature;9 however, to the best of our knowledge, there has
been no report of successful spontaneous membrane fusion of
liposomes by synthetic chemical transformation (dehydroconden-
sation) of naturally occurring lipids.
E (%)
fatty acid
run
salt
product
1 h
2 h
3 h
24 h
1
2
3
1a
1b
1c
6ap
6bp
6cp
1
0
7
39
13
63
65
41
78
68
66
73
a The reaction was performed with 1, 2p, 3a, and CDMT. 1a, sodium
laurate; 1b, sodium stearate; 1c, sodium oleate.
It is well known that membrane fusion of liposomes is readily
induced by the addition of various fusogenic molecules, like
polyethyleneglycol and alkali earth ions.1c These methods can be
classified as external chemical stimulation, in which the fusogenic
molecules force the membrane to fuse by interaction with a lipid
headgroup or the surface of vesicles. In marked contrast, in our
system the SUV spontaneously undergoes membrane fusion upon
internal chemical stimulation by the product of our artificial enzyme
system.
Ceramide has been reported to serve a variety of functions in
inducing morphological changes of membranes; for example, it acts
as a signal molecule and a constituent of a microdomain (a lipid
raft).10 The present work introduces the possibility that endogenous
mere formation of ceramides from single-chain lipids (sphingosine
and fatty acids) may induce membrane fusion, without requiring
fusogenic proteins or other biological factors. Our system should
be very useful for elucidating the dynamic functions of a variety
of lipids in membranes.
Figure 2. Freeze-fracture transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of
liposome. Scale bar ) 200 nm. 1.3 mM each of PC, 1a, and 2p, and 0.26
mM of 3a. (a) Liposomes are present with vesicle size ranging from 50 to
100 nm before addition of CDMT. (b) Large to giant vesicles with diameters
up to about 1 µm are formed at 3 h after addition of CDMT (6.5 mM). (c)
A control experiment during the same period without CDMT.
When a water-soluble, dehydrocondensing agent 4-(4,6-dimethoxy-
1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholinium chloride (DMT-MM),5a
available in water, was employed instead of a combination of
catalyst 3a and CDMT in the reaction using 1a, the E value was
very low, even after 72 h (22%).
Since the probe mixing assay is known to be sensitive to
aggregation of vesicles, a probe dilution assay that is generally
insensitive to the mere aggregation of vesicles was also employed.6
This assay confirmed that, for experiments using 1a, membrane
fusion involving lipid mixing did indeed occur (see Supporting
Information).
The formation of pseudo-ceramide 6p appears to be essential for
inducing membrane fusion in this system, in that it apparently occurs
prior to the increase in the E value. Thus, the yields of 6ap, which
were determined by ESI-MS, were 48% and 77% at 1 and 2 h,
respectively, in the reaction under the same conditions as in Table
1, run 1. On the other hand, no significant formation of 6ap (2%)
was observed in the above system using DMT-MM after 24 h, and
under these conditions the E value was only 12%.
The change in size of the liposomes during the reaction was
measured by dynamic light scattering. The mean volume diameter
of the liposome, including 1a with CDMT, increased from 46 to
166 nm over the course of 3 h, whereas no change in the diameter
was observed without addition of CDMT. We also observed
liposomes prepared from lipids of a higher concentration (20 times)
by freeze-fracture transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The
liposomes containing 1a were in the range of 50-100 nm before
reaction (Figure 2a). When CDMT was added to start dehydro-
condensation, large to giant vesicles with diameters up to about 1
µm were formed after 3 h (Figure 2b). No change in the size of
liposomes was observed without CDMT during the same period
(Figure 2c). The increase in the diameter (up to 20 times the original
in the largest examples) indicates that hundreds of SUVs fused one
after another.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported partially by a
Grant-in-Aid for Science Research (No. 18659006) from the
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology,
Japan.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic methods, experi-
mental details, and further discussion. This material is available free
References
(1) (a) Devaux, P. F. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 1163-1173. (b) Lipowsky, R.
Biophys. J. 1993, 64, 1133-1138. (c) Blumenthal, R.; Clague, M. J.;
Durell, S. R.; Epand, R. M. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 53-69. (d) Cevc, G.;
Richardsen, H. AdV. Drug DeliVery ReV. 1999, 38, 207-232.
(2) McMahon, H. T.; Gallop, J. L. Nature 2005, 438, 590-596.
(3) Chernomordik, L.; Kozlov, M. M.; Zimmerberg, J. J. Membr. Biol. 1995,
146, 1-14.
(4) (a) White, J. M. Science 1992, 258, 917-924. (b) Su¨dhof, T. C. Annu.
ReV. Neurosci. 2004, 27, 509-547. (c) Chen, E. H.; Olson, E. N. Science
2005, 308, 369-373. (d) Bonifacino, J. S.; Glick, B. S. Cell 2004, 116,
153-166.
(5) (a) Kunishima, M.; Kawachi, C.; Hioki, K.; Terao, K.; Tani, S. Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 1551-1558. (b) Kunishima, M.; Yoshimura, K.; Morigaki, H.;
Kawamata, R.; Terao, K.; Tani, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10760-
10761. (c) Kunishima, M.; Imada, H.; Kikuchi, K.; Hioki, K.; Nishida,
J.; Tani, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7254-7257.
(6) NBD-PE, N-(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)dimyristoylphosphatidyl-
ethanolamine; Rh-PE, N-(lissamine rhodamine B sulfonyl)dimyristoylphos-
phatidylethanolamine. Du¨zgu¨nes, N.; Allen, T. M.; Fedor, J.; Papahad-
jopoulos, D. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 8435-8442.
(7) Struck, D. K.; Hoekstra, D.; Pagano, R. E. Biochemistry 1981, 20, 4093-
4099.
(8) On the basis of the E value, it can be estimated that approximately 70%
fusion occurred after 3 h.
(9) (a) Bachmann, P. A.; Luisi, P. L.; Lang, J. Nature 1992, 357, 57-59. (b)
Menger, F. M.; Gabrielson, K. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34,
2091-2106. (c) Jaeger, D. A.; Clark, T., Jr. Langmuir 2002, 18, 3495-
3499. (d) Takakura, K.; Toyota, T.; Sugawara, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 8134-8140.
(10) (a) Kro¨nke, M. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1999, 101, 109-121. (b) van
Blitterswijk, W. J.; van der Luit, A. H.; Veldman, R. J.; Verheij, M.;
Borst, J. Biochem. J. 2003, 369, 199-211.
Finally, we have found that the membrane fusion proceeded with
an SUV comprised of naturally occurring lipids, in which sphin-
gosine 2 was used instead of 2p, leading to the formation of
ceramide 6a. Interestingly, under the same conditions as those
shown in Table 1, run 1, the E value increased moderately (36%
JA0652969
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 45, 2006 14453