Finally, the modified oligonucleotides were evaluated for their
potential as triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs).
modified strand (being in fact a 13-mer) recognizes a 16-mer
complementary strand with a drop of just 1.0 °C in thermal
stability as compared to the unmodified duplex. The potential of
CC in triplex-forming oligonucleotides has been evaluated as
well, but clearly, the present design is not well-suited for this
function. From these results, it can be concluded that CC is able
to condense the information of two deoxycytidines to a single
double-headed nucleotide, while it at the same time is improving
the thermal stability of the duplex. This is a truly unique set of
properties that may have future potential in the development of
nucleic acid based therapeutics.
Polypyrimidine oligonucleotides already studied in duplexes
(Fig. 3, entries D2–D5 and D7) were hybridized with a standard
29-mer target DNA duplex15,20 in a high salt buffer at pH 6, and
the melting temperatures of the resulting triplexes were
measured. Triplex formation, however, was only observed for
one of the modified sequences having a single CC incorporation
(Fig. 4). Even this triplex was considerably destabilized by the
modification, showing a decrease in melting temperature of 7.5
°C compared to the unmodified triplex (24.5 °C). Consequently,
it seems that the design of the presented double-headed
nucleotides is not optimal for accommodation in triplexes.
Probably neither the constrained double-headed nucleotide
structure nor the target duplex allows for the necessary
adjustment of the geometry.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Danish Council
for Independent Research | Natural Sciences.
In summary, we have shown some systematic effects on
duplex stability of the different double-headed nucleotides. The
incorporation of UT destabilizes the duplex by –3.5 °C,14 whereas
the CC monomer shows a stabilizing effect of 4.0 °C. In
comparison, the UA monomer gave a destabilization of –2.5 °C,
whereas UC and UG showed minor effects on duplex stability of
+1.0 °C and 0.0 °C, respectively, in similar sequences.14 Even
though G:C pairs are always stronger than A:T and A:U pairs, the
present results demonstrate that G:C base pairs provide a
relatively larger stabilizing effect in the condensed DNA
provided by the double-headed nucleotides. The reason might be
found in the special geometry, and a speculation could be that the
third hydrogen bond of the G:C pair thermodynamically drives
the neighbouring base-pairs into a more fixed geometry. Further
studies are needed to enlighten this observation.
Supplementary Material
Electronic supplementary material contains experimental
details including synthetic procedures, selected NMR spectra,
procedures for oligonucleotide synthesis and hybridization
studies, as well as MS data for modified oligonucleotides.
References and notes
1.
2.
3.
Deleavey, G. F.; Damha, M. J. Chem. Biol. 2012, 19, 937.
Wan, W. B.; Seth, P. P. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 9645.
Chandrasekaran, A. R.; Rusling, D. A. Nucleic Acids Res.
2018, 46, 1021.
4.
5.
Endo, M.; Sugiyama, H. ChemBioChem 2009, 10, 2420.
Bandy, T. J.; Brewer, A.; Burns, J. R.; Marth, G.; Nguyen,
T.; Stulz, E. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 138.
With the present results, we have gained increased knowledge
of DNA duplexes with double-headed nucleotides and about the
scope in sequence design; (1) Several modifications are allowed
in the same sequence without compromising the thermal stability.
6.
Sharma, P. K.; Kumar, P.; Nielsen, P. Aus. J. Chem. 2016,
69, 1094.
7.
Christensen, M. S.; Madsen, C. M.; Nielsen, P. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2007, 5, 1586.
(2)
A small penalty, however, is paid for consecutive
incorporations. (3) Stabilization is gained with G:C base pairs,
while some destabilization comes with A:T base pairs, relative to
native DNA. A larger variety of sequences including double-
headed nucleotide monomers with other base-combinations is
needed to explore the full scope of modification with double-
headed nucleotides in oligonucleotides and, in other words, the
maximal level of condensation of the information in DNA.
In conclusion, a double-headed nucleoside with two protected
8.
Madsen, C. S.; Nielsen, L. J.; Pedersen, N. S.; Lauritsen, A.;
Nielsen, P. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 10696.
9.
Pedersen, S. L.; Nielsen, P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3,
3570.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Madsen, C. S.; Witzke, S.; Kumar, P.; Negi, K.; Sharma, P.
K.; Petersen, M.; Nielsen, P. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 7434.
Kumar, P.; Sharma, P. K.; Madsen, C. S.; Petersen, M.;
Nielsen, P. ChemBioChem 2013, 14, 1072.
Kumar, P.; Madsen, C. S.; Nielsen, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett 2013, 23, 6847.
cytosine bases has been synthesized in
8 steps from
commercially available uridine, and thereafter protected and
activated for oligonucleotide synthesis. A selection of modified
oligonucleotides has been prepared containing this CC monomer
and/or the corresponding uridine-based UT monomer. The
hybridization studies showed that CC is very well-accommodated
in double-stranded DNA, and moreover, the mismatch
discrimination properties of CC were shown to be excellent at
both positions. It has also been shown that multiple incor-
porations of double-headed nucleotides are tolerated, as a triply
Kumar, P.; Sharma, P. K.; Nielsen, P. J. Org. Chem. 2014,
79, 11534.
Hornum, M.; Sharma, P. K.; Reslow-Jacobsen, C.; Kumar,
P.; Petersen, M.; Nielsen, P. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 9717.
Kumar, P.; Sorinas, A. F.; Nielsen, L. J.; Slot, M.; Skytte, K.;
Nielsen, A. S.; Jensen, M. D.; Sharma, P. K.; Vester, B.;
Petersen, M.; Nielsen, P. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 8020.
Dalager, M.; Andersen, N. K.; Kumar, P.; Nielsen, P.;
Sharma, P. K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 7040.
Kumar, P.; Sharma, P. K.; Hansen, J.; Jedinak, L.; Reslow-
Jacobsen, C.; Hornum, M.; Nielsen, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2016, 24, 742.
16.
17.
5’
T T T T C T T T T C C C C C C T
5’
C C A C T T T T T A A A A G A A A A G G G G G G A C T G G
G G T G A A A A A T T T T C T T T T C C C C C C T G A C C
18.
19.
20.
Wu, T.; Nauwelaerts, K.; Van Aerschot, A.; Froeyen, M.;
Lescrinier, E.; Herdewijn, P. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5423.
Umemoto, T.; Wengel, J.; Madsen, A. S. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2009, 7, 1793.
Højland, T.; Kumar, S.; Babu, B. R.; Umemoto, T.; Albæk,
N.; Sharma, P. K.; Nielsen, P.; Wengel, J. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2007, 5, 2375.
3’
17.0 (–7.5)
Figure 4. Structure of a selected triplex, its melting temperaturea (Tm, °C) and
the difference in melting temperature (∆Tm, °C) relative to the unmodified
triplex. a Melting temperatures were determined in a buffer containing 10 mM
sodium cacodylate, 150 mM NaCl and 10 mM MgCl2 at pH 6.0 using 1.5 μM
concentrations of the TFOs and 1.0 mM concentrations of each strands of the
target DNA-duplex. In all experiments the melting temperature of the duplex
was found to be 68 °C.
21.
Lemaire, S.; Houpis, I.; Wechselberger, R.; Langens, J.;
Vermeulen, W. A. A.; Smets, N.; Nettekoven, U.; Wang, Y.;