human health. So, after having established what these
aerosols are, and what hazards they present to the popu-
lation, I think that the next logical question is: Shouldn’t
we now also investigate in parallel the technical solutions
for the control of this problem, rather than just studying,
in relative isolation, the science of the sources, nature, and
consequences of the problem? I propose that the former
path is by far the wiser, and that it makes excellent sense
to begin searching now for effective technical means for
air pollution control (APC) of these submicron combus-
tion aerosols.
recovered in a CHE by using the otherwise wasted energy
to heat a cold fluid, typically cold water.
The most commonly used CHE commercially avail-
able uses low alloy construction, with the surfaces exposed
1,2
to condensing flue gas being Teflon-coated. The company
2
manufacturing this technology, CHX, markets it for heat-
economizing, but it is obvious from their marketing video
that particulates can also be captured and removed with
the condensate. The video shows a sample of the low-pH
condensate, which is black like India ink. This observation
led Consolidated Edison Co. of New York to investigate
the use of the CHE in an integrated design, for the purpose
of combined heat recovery and pollution control, includ-
The history of similar problems (low-level radiation,
water pollution, air pollution, hazardous waste disposal,
etc.) shows that the lapse of a significant period of time
1
ing particulate pollution control. Although the results were
(
measured in decades) is to be expected between the iden-
measured as total particulate loading in LB/million BTU, it
was reported that “1/4 condensation also occurs on sub-
micron-size particulate, enhancing their removal” by “caus-
ing particle growth through agglomeration, and ultimately
removing the fine particulates.” Also reported were signifi-
cant Hg removal efficiencies, ~50%.
tification of such problems and the effective implemen-
tation of remediation, nationwide. This produces the
curious result that the scientists who initially identify and
quantify the problem might anticipate that their grand-
children may well enter adulthood, without effective pro-
tection from the consequences of the problem, before it
has been fixed.
The second technology is the so-called Cloud Cham-
3
ber Scrubber (CCS). This technology was developed to
An extensive delay between discovery and cure is not
particularly desirable, appropriate, or even necessary.
Rather, the search for effective APC solutions for these
combustion aerosols should be pursued, as a companion
and parallel research endeavor, for the specific objective
of reducing this delay.
simulate conditions within clouds for the purpose of clean-
ing gases while using very modest amounts of both water
and electricity. It is specifically marketed as an APC tech-
4
nology for “all generators of particulate under 1 micron.”
Very fine droplets of water are generated and electrically
charged. It was reported that “as they (droplets and par-
ticulates) approach 10 microns of separation, electrical
attraction causes the particulate to enter the droplet” and
“the CCS has been shown to be 99%+ efficient for the
collection of all particulate from 0.1 to 3.0 microns.”
These two technologies are not presented here be-
cause they are the solutions to the APC of the submicron
combustion aerosols. Rather, they are presented as exist-
ing, commercially available, working technologies that
might be adapted for this use. The advantage is that they
are available today, as working systems. They can be
quickly pilot-tested on actual source streams to determine
their effectiveness. If these results are promising, the tech-
nologies can then be further investigated, scientifically,
for the purpose of determining the practicality of adapt-
ing them for the effective APC of these submicron com-
bustion aerosols.
What has been presented here is not a technical
means for the APC of combustion aerosols. Rather, a rec-
ommendation has been made for the search for such a
means, employing technological “gatekeeping,” to iden-
tify and then attempt to adapt existing technology for
this role. Two examples were briefly described. By inves-
tigating in parallel both the scientific fundamentals of
the nature of the problem of these aerosols and the tech-
nical means for their control, the lapse of time between
Natural processes continuously introduce submicron
particulates into the atmosphere, and consequently, other
natural processes that remove them must exist in bal-
ance. Therefore, it seems rational that effective APC tech-
nologies might well utilize some of the same phenomena
involved in these latter, particulate “removal” processes.
Some of these processes occur within clouds, where nucle-
ation, condensation, and electrostatic forces are particu-
larly active. In fact, at least two such commercial
technologies already exist, utilizing such phenomena,
and each has been investigated to some extent for use in
the APC of similar submicron particulates. Better yet, pilot
scale equipment for each technology exist that would
permit the evaluation of the effectiveness of these tech-
nologies for the APC of these aerosols.
The first technology is the so-called condensing heat
exchanger (CHE). In the form described here, the CHE
was developed to recover waste heat from boilers. Fuel
combustion typically produces acidic flue gas. Boilers are
designed to avoid corrosion from acidic flue gas by being
operated above that temperature at which any conden-
sate can form, the so-called dew point. This standard op-
erating practice results in boiler flue gases being released
to the atmosphere at temperatures typically between 300
and 400 ºF. The consequent lost energy can be partially
Volume 50 September 2000
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 1621