attack to a surface (p-allyl)Pd intermediate, i.e. the active sites
would be strongly shielded from the endo attack of the
nucleophile. The moderate selectivity with 3a and 3b might be
due to the loosely packed dendrimer surfaces, which would
allow the partial dissociation of chelate phosphine ligands.11
Similar stereoselective performances in allylic aminations due
to steric hindrance of solid supports have also been observed by
Trost and others using polystyrene- and silica-bound Pd(0)
complex catalysts.12
Recycling of dendritic metal complex catalysts was at-
tempted by solvent precipitation3b or membrane filtration,3d
which often results in some losses of the catalytic activities
during the recovery and reuse processes. Fortunately, our
dendritic Pd(0) catalysts 3 could be easily recycled by using a
biphasic system of DMF and heptane and the system does not
need any special procedures such as membrane filtration.¶ The
two phases consisting of DMF and heptane became homoge-
neous when heated up to 75 °C, and then could be readily
separated by cooling the reaction mixtures to room temperature.
Extremely low solubility of the dendrimers 3 in the apolar
heptane solvent meant the catalysts were completely transferred
to DMF and the catalyst solution could be recycled after
decantation of the heptane phase containing products. For
example, in the allylic substitution of trans-cinnamyl acetate
with dibutylamine, the high catalytic activity was retained
during three reuse experiments: yields of the allylic amine in
heptane phase were 66% (1st), 99% (2nd), 99% (3rd) and 99%
(4th run), respectively.∑ This is the first application of dendritic
catalysts in a thermomorphic system.
In conclusion dendrimer-bound Pd(0) complexes have been
synthesised by reduction of dendritic Pd(II) complexes with
hydrazine. They show high stereoselectivity for allylic amina-
tion ascribed to the surface congestion of the dendrimers.
Employing a thermomorphic system makes it possible to
efficiently recycle the dendritic catalysts. We expect that the
above results could give a clue to more sophisticated catalyst
designs of dendrimers for highly selective organic syntheses.
This work is supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and
Culture of Japan (12750691 and 11450307). We are grateful to
the Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, Graduate
School of Engineering Science, Osaka University for scientific
support via the ‘Gas-Hydrate Analyzing System (GHAS)’ and
the Lend-Lease Laboratory System.
Notes and references
† Selected data: for 1b: 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 7.16–7.33 (m, 320H, Ph), 3.50
(br, 54H, NCH2P), 2.76 (br, 32H, CH2NCH2P), 2.17–2.34 (br, 92H,
CH2NCH2CH2, NCH2CH2CH2NCH2P), 1.42(br, 60H, NCH2CH2CH2N,
NCH2CH2CH2CH2N). 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3): d 227. For 2b: 31P{1H}
NMR (DMSO-d6): d 8. XPS: 343.4 eV (Pd 3d3/2), 338.3 eV (Pd 3d5/2). IR
(CsI) 294 cm21 (cis Pd–Cl). For 3b: 31P{1H} NMR (DMSO-d6): d 27. XPS:
342.0 eV (Pd 3d3/2), 336.8 eV (Pd 3d5/2).
‡ Typical reaction conditions: trans-cinnamyl acetate (1.5 mmol), morpho-
line (1.8 mmol), catalyst (5 mmol of Pd atoms), DMSO (5 mL), 40 °C, Ar
atmosphere.
§ Because of the low solubility of the dendrimers 3, T1 for the dendrimers
1 in place of 3 was measured by the inversion–recovery method.
¶ Reaction conditions for the thermomorphic catalysis are as follows:
dendritic catalyst (10 mmol of Pd atoms), DMF (1.5 mL), dibutylamine (1.8
mmol), triethylamine (1.5 mmol), heptane (3 mL), and trans-cinnamyl
acetate (1.5 mmol) were added in a Schlenk type flask under Ar and stirred
at 75 °C for 1 h. For reuse experiments, heptane, allylic acetate, a
nucleophile and triethylamine were added subsequently after decantation of
the heptane phase. These procedures were repeated three times.
∑ The relatively low yield for the fresh run was due to the distribution of
allylic amine product in the DMF phase. No Pd leaching in the heptane
phase was observed during recycle experiments according to ICP (detection
limit is 0.1 ppm).
1 Reviews and a book on dendrimers: (a) D. A. Tomalia, H. Baker, J. R.
Dewald, M. Hall, G. Kallos, S. Martin, J. Roeck, J. Ryder and P. Smith,
Polym. J., 1985, 17, 117; (b) F. Zeng and S. C. Zimmerman, Chem. Rev.,
1997, 97, 1681; (c) A. W. Bosman, H. M. Janssen and E. W. Meijer,
Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 1665; (d) G. R. Newkome, C. N. Moorefield and
F. Vo¨gtle, Dendritic Molecules: Concepts, Synthesis, Perspectives,
VCH, Weinheim, 1996.
2 (a) G. R. Newkome, E. He and C. N. Moorefield, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99,
1689; (b) G. E. Oosterom, J. N. H. Reek, P. C. J. Kamer and P. W. N.
M. van Leeuwen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 1828; (c) D. Astruc
and F. Chardac, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 2991.
3 (a) J. W. J. Knapen, A. W. van der Made, J. C. de Wilde, P. W. M. N.
van Leeuwen, P. Wijkens, D. M. Grove and G. van Koten, Nature,
1994, 372, 659; (b) M. T. Reetz, G. Lohmer and R. Schwickardi, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 1526; dendritic catalysts for continuous
flow membrane reactors, see: (c) N. J. Hovestad, E. B. Eggeling, H. J.
Heidbuchel, J. T. B. H. Jastrzebski, U. Kragl, W. Keim, D. Vogt and G.
van Koten, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 1655; (d) D. de Groot, E.
B. Eggeling, J. C. de Wilde, H. Kooijman, R. J. van Haaren, A. W. van
der Made, A. L. Spek, D. Vogt, J. N. H. Reek, P. C. J. Kamer and P. W.
N. M. van Leeuwen, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1623; (e) N. Brinkmann,
D. Giebel, G. Lohmer, M. T. Reetz and U. Kragl, J. Catal., 1999, 183,
163; (f) E. B. Eggeling, N. J. Hovestad, J. T. B. H. Jastrzebsky, D. Vogt
and G. van Koten, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 8857.
4 (a) C. Koellner, B. Pugin and A. Togni, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
10274; (b) T. Mizugaki, M. Ooe, K. Ebitani and K. Kaneda, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem., 1999, 145, 329; (c) R. Breinbauer and E. N. Jacobsen,
Angew Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3604; (d) L. Ropartz, R. E. Morris, D.
F. Foster and D. J. Cole-Hamilton, Chem. Commun., 2001, 361.
5 Reviews on allylic amination: (a) M. Johannsen and K. A. Jørgensen,
Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 1689; (b) A. Heumann, in Transition Metals for
Organic Synthesis, ed. M. Beller and C. Bolm, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
1998, p. 251.
6 (a) D. E. Bergbreiter, Y-S. Liu and P. L. Osburn, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1998, 120, 4250; (b) D. E. Bergbreiter, P. L. Osburn, A. Wilson and E.
M. Sink, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 9058.
7 I. Horvath and J. Rabai, Science, 1994, 266, 72.
8 M. Terasawa, K. Kaneda, T. Imanaka and S. Teranishi, J. Organomet.
Chem., 1978, 162, 403.
9 G. E. Oosterom, R. J. van Haaren, J. N. H. Reek, P. C. J. Kamer and P.
W. N. M. van Leeuwen, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1119.
10 (a) A. M. Nayler, W. A. Goddard III, G. E. Kiefer and D. A. Tomalia,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 2339; (b) J. F. G. A. Jansen, E. M. M. de
Brabander-van den Berg and E. W. Meijer, Science, 1994, 266, 1226.
11 Z. Csakai, R. Skoda-Fördes and L. Kollár, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1999,
286, 93.
12 (a) B. M. Trost and E. Keinan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 7779; (b)
B. M. Trost and T. R. Verhoeven, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102,
4730;(c) J. E. Bäckvall, K. L. Granberg and A. Heumann, Isr. J. Chem.,
1991, 31, 17.
Fig. 1 Generation dependence on selectivity in the allylic amination of cis-
3-acetoxy-5-carbomethoxycyclohex-1-ene with morpholine. Stereoselec-
tivity for cis isomer was compared at 30% conversion of the substrate.
Selectivity (%) = [(cis 2 trans)/(cis + trans)] 3 100. T1 values were
calculated for the C4 carbon (128 ppm) in the phenyl groups of the
corresponding dendrimers 1, respectively.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 52–53
53