‡ Standard procedure for the carbonylation: The reactor equipped with a
small vial was charged with argon gas in a desiccator. Then, a DMF (10 ml)
solution of Pd catalyst (0.1 mmol) was charged in this vial, and the reactor
was placed in an oven. After reaching the desired temperature of 130 °C (for
ca. 1.5 h), a mixture of the substrate (0.5 mmol) and Et3N (1.1 mmol) was
added into the reactor (outside the vial) with a syringe through an opening
against a flow of CO2. Subsequently, CO (1–10 atm) was introduced, and
then CO2 (200 atm) was added with an HPLC pump. After stirring for 18 h,
the reactor was cooled in a bath of MeOH and dry ice. The mixture of CO
and CO2 was vented, and the reactor was slowly warmed to room
temperature. The yield of 2 was determined by 1H NMR and GC analyses
of CDCl3 solutions of the products. On-line analysis was conducted by
using a reactor vessel connected to the FT-IR equipment (JASCO FT/IR-
610). The reaction was monitored by collecting spectra at intervals over the
period of the reaction.
Fig. 1 Time vs. TON plots for the carbonylation of 1 catalysed by
[PdCl2{P(OEt)3}2] 3b, in (a) scCO2 (standard procedure) or (b) toluene
(substrate+catalyst = 5000+1, catalyst = 0.1 mmol).
1 Recent reviews; (a) P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Science,
1995, 269, 1065; (b) P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Chem. Rev.,
1999, 99, 475.
2 (a) P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Organometallics, 1995, 14,
1510; (b) M. J. Burk, S. Feng, M. F. Gross and W. Tumas, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1995, 117, 8277; (c) J.-L. Xiao, S. C. A. Nefkens, P. G. Jessop, T.
Ikariya and R. Noyori, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 2813; (d) S. Kainz,
D. Koch and W. Leitner, Selective Reactions of Metal-Activated
Molecules, ed. H. Werner and W. Schreier, Vieweg, Wiesbaden, 1998,
pp. 151–156; (e) S. Buelow, P. Dell’Orco, D. K. Morita, D. Pesiri, E.
Birnbaum, S. Borkowsky, S. Feng, L. Luan, D. Morgenstern and W.
Tumas, Green Chemistry, ed. O. T. Anastas and T. C. Williamson, OUP,
New York, 1998, pp. 265–285.
3 (a) J. W. Rathke, R. J. Klingler and T. R. Krause, Organometallics,
1991, 10, 1350; (b) S. Kainz, D. Koch, W. Baumann and W. Leitner,
Angew. Chem., 1997, 109, 1699; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997,
36, 1628; (c) D. Koch and W. Leitner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
13 398; (d) D. R. Palo and C. Erkey, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1998, 37,
4203; (e) I. Bach and D. J. Cole-Hamilton, Chem. Commun., 1998,
1463.
scCO2 phase, where the carbonyl complex effects the reaction
highly efficiently and is deactivated during the later stages of
the reaction because of the lack of a stabilizing ligand in the
scCO2 phase. In order to increase the solubility of the transition
metal complexes in scCO2, ligand modifications such as
replacement of ligands containing aryl substituents to ligands
bearing alkyl or perfluoroalkyl groups or introduction of CO2-
philic ponytails as substituents on the aryl groups have been
developed previously.4b,c,11 The use of phosphonate ligands has
proved to be a practical alternative ligand modification for
increasing the solubility of transition metal complexes in
supercritical fluids.
The advantage of performing the carbonylation in super-
critical fluids is that there is no marked effect of the CO pressure
on the TON values obtained in scCO2. Because of the higher
diffusivity of scCO2 compared to organic solvents as well as the
high solubility of CO in this medium, the carbonylation even at
1 atm of CO pressure (CO+substrate = ca. 1.5+1) proceeded to
near completion (TON = 4650). The yield of the product 2
(TON ~ 5000) is independent of the CO pressure over a range
of 1–5 atm in scCO2 (200 atm), whereas the reaction in toluene
under otherwise identical conditions provided lower TON
values (3100–3800) over a range of 1–5 atm of CO. The time
conversion curve obtained by batch-wise experiments, illus-
trated in Fig. 1, as well as direct monitoring of the reaction by
on-line FTIR revealed that the reaction proceeds rapidly to
completion within 3–4 h after a ca. 2 h induction period.
The phosphonate–Pd catalyst can be applied to the inter-
molecular carbonylation of iodobenzene 4 and methanol
(substrate+catalyst = 500+1) under the standard conditions in
scCO2 to yield methyl benzoate (TON = 260). Further
optimization of the reaction is now in progress.
4 (a) P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Nature, 1994, 368, 231;
(b) P. G. Jessop, Y. Hsiao, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1996, 118, 344.
5 K. M. Dooley and F. C. Knopf, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1987, 26, 1910;
G. J. Suppes, R. N. Occhiogrosso and M. A. McHugh, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 1989, 28, 1152; P. Srinivas and M. Mukhopadhyay, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res., 1994, 33, 3118; X.-W. Wu, Y. Oshima and S. Koda, Chem.
Lett., 1997, 1045; P. G. Jessop, Top. Catal., 1998, 5, 95; U. Kreher, S.
Schebesta and D. Walther, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1998, 624, 602.
6 A. Cowell and J. K. Stille, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 4193.
7 Y. Kayaki, I. Shimizu and A. Yamamoto, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1997,
70, 1141.
8 The TON values obtained from 18 h reactions in toluene under
otherwise identical conditions decrease in the order: P(OEt)3
PMe3.
>
9 [PdCl2{PPh3}2] complex is known to react with CO in in Et3N
containing alcohols to give several kinds of Pd carbonyls and PPh3. M.
Hidai, M. Kokura and Y. Uchida, J. Organomet. Chem., 1973, 52,
431.
10 [Pd(CO)4] is known to be thermally unstable; J. H. Darling and J. S.
Ogden, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1973, 1079.
11 A. F. Lagante, B. N. Hansen, T. J. Bruno and R. E. Sievers, Inorg.
Chem., 1995, 34, 5781; Y. H. Lin, N. G. Smart and C. M. Wai, Trends
Anal. Chem., 1995, 14, 123; A. V. Yazdi and E. J. Beckmann, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res., 1997, 36, 2368; R. P. Hughes and H. A. Trujillo,
Organometallics, 1996, 15, 286; M. A. Carroll and A. B. Holmes,
Chem. Commun., 1998, 1395; D. K. Morita, D. R. Pesiri, S. A. David,
W. H. Glaze and W. Tumas, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1397.
In conclusion, the carbonylation of aryl halides catalysed by
Pd complexes with phosphonate ligands proceeds rapidly in
scCO2. The rate of the reaction is higher than that in the liquid
phase.
Notes and references
† SAFETY WARNING: Operators of high-pressure equipment should
take proper precautions to minimize the risk of personal injury [ref. 4(b)].
Communication 9/02942G
1236
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1235–1236