Engberts et al.
thermore, one should take into consideration that the levels of
the FMOs can be affected by (de)stabilizing factors. For
example, electron-withdrawing substituents stabilize the FMOs,
whereas electron-donating substituents raise the FMO energy.
Similarly, complexation of Lewis acids leads to a drop in FMO
energy.16 Hydrogen bonding is another factor that can promote
cycloadditions by reducing the energies of the FMOs.17 Hydrogen-
bond interactions can stabilize the FMOs of the reactants, and
the magnitude depends on the susceptibility of the reactants
toward such interactions. The preferred complexation of Lewis
acids with nitrile oxides18 indicates that nitrile oxides are good
Lewis bases. Therefore, the FMOs of these dipoles are
substantially stabilized in protic solvents. For the reaction of
nitrile oxides with electron-poor dipolarophiles, the dominating
interaction is that between the HOMO of the 1,3-dipole and
the LUMO of the dipolarophile. The electron-poor dipolaro-
philes are relatively good hydrogen-bond acceptors, leading to
a reduction of the levels of the FMOs in protic solvents.
However, this interaction is less efficient than that between the
nitrile oxide and protic solvents. This means that the Gibbs
energy of activation is increased for this reaction, leading to a
retardation of the cycloadditions of the nitrile oxide with
electron-poor dipolarophiles in protic solvents.
FIGURE 4. Fitting of eq 13 to the experimental results obtained in
the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of benzonitrile oxide to N-ethylmaleimide
in AOT/isooctane/water microemulsions at 25.0 °C.
TABLE 2. Rate Constant of the 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition of
Benzonitrile Oxide to N-Ethylmaleimide at 25.0 °C
solvent
k/M-1 s-1
hexanea
2.6 × 10-3
1.7 × 10-3
1.2 × 10-3
2.7 × 10-3
3.3 × 10-3
2.3 × 10-3
8.5 × 10-3
5.5 × 10-2
1,4-dioxanea
dichloromethanea
DMSOa
Hydrogen bonding would provoke the reaction rate of
benzonitrile oxide cycloaddition to N-ethylmaleimide to diminish
on increasing the water content of the microemulsion. Previous
studies in our laboratory have allowed us to obtain the values
of the solvent ionizing power of the interface depending on the
water content of AOT-based microemulsions.19 The ionizing
power and nucleophilicity of the interface of AOT-based
microemulsions are influenced by the water content of the
system. When W decreases so does the ionizing power because
2,2,2-trifluoroethanola
ethanola
watera
interface or AOT-based
microemulsionb
a From ref 10b. b In AOT/isooctane/water microemulsions.
is roughly 20 times higher than that in the organic solvents and
approximately 5 times higher than that in water; this is rather
surprising as the reaction is weakly sensitive to the polarity of
the medium.
-
the strong interaction between the SO3 anionic headgroup of
the surfactant and the water molecules decreases the electrophilic
character of water. Nevertheless, the results obtained in the
present work show that the reaction rate is W-independent and
approximately 5 times higher than that in bulk water. Recent
studies20 on the cycloaddition of nitrones to nitriles have shown
that the interaction of Lewis acids with the nitrile in the course
of the reaction facilitates the cycloaddition by stabilizing
transition states, intermediate, and product rather than by
activating the nitrile. When the reaction takes place at the
interface of AOT-based microemulsions, the possibility of
interaction with Lewis acids must be discarded since the
interface of the microemulsion presents an increase of the basic
character in comparison with bulk water due to the interactions
with the SO3- anionic headgroup of the surfactant and the water
molecules.
Experimental results for the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of
benzonitrile oxide to N-ethylmaleimide10a were explained in
terms of the frontier molecular orbital (FMO) theory, which
has been used extensively to explain and predict reactivity in
1,3-dipolar cycloadditions.12 This theory states that the Gibbs
energy of activation is related to the energy gap between
the interacting HOMO and LUMO. The energies of HOMO
and LUMO can be experimentally assessed (ionization poten-
tial and electron affinity, respectively) or theoretically esti-
mated. For a number of common reactants in 1,3-dipolar
cycloadditions, Houk13 has calculated the energy of the FMOs.
For most 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions, a good correlation is ob-
served between the Gibbs energy of activation and the ionization
potential of the dipolarophile, in accordance with the FMO
theory.14 FMO theory also accounts for stereoselectivity and
regioselectivity: reactions take place in the direction of
maximum HOMO-LUMO overlap.15 The relative levels of
the HOMO and LUMO of both reactants determine whether
the HOMO(dipole)-LUMO(dipolarophile) interactions or the
LUMO(dipole)-HOMO(dipolarophile) interactions are dominant. Fur-
To justify the behavior observed in AOT/isooctane/water
microemulsions, one must consider the specific region of the
(16) Laszlo, P.; Lucche, J. Act. Chim. 1984, 42.
(17) (a) Corsico Coda, A.; Desimoni, G.; Ferrari, E.; Righetti, P. P.;
Tacconi, G. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1611. (b) Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.;
Righetti, P.; Tornaletti, N.; Visigalli, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
1989, 437. (c) Burdisso, M.; Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Righetti, P.; Tacconi,
G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1989, 845. (d) Corsico Coda, A.;
Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Righetti, P.; Tacconi, G. Tetrahedron 1989, 45,
775. (e) Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Righetti, P. P.; Toma, L. Tetrahedron
1990, 46, 7951. (f) Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Righetti, P. P. Tetrahedron
1991, 47, 5857. (g) Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Pasini, D.; Righetti, P. P.
Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 1667.
(18) Curran, D. P.; Kim, B. H.; Piyasena, H. P.; Loncharich, R. J.; Houk,
K. N. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 2137.
(19) Garc´ıa-R´ıo, L.; Hervella, P.; Leis, J. R. Langmuir 2005, 21, 7672.
(20) Wagner, G. Chem.sEur. J. 2003, 9, 1503.
(12) (a) Sauer, J.; Sustmann, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1980, 19,
779. (b) Huisgen, R. Pure Appl. Chem. 1980, 52, 2283.
(13) (a) Houk, K. N.; Sims, J.; Duke, R. E.; Strozier, R. W.; Geroge, J.
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 7287. (b) Houk, K. N.; Sims, J.; Watts, C.
R.; Luskus, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 7301. (c) Houk, K. N.; Chang,
Y.-M.; Strozier, R. W.; Caramella, P. Heterocycles 1977, 7, 793.
(14) Sustmann, R. Pure Appl. Chem. 1974, 40, 569.
(15) Fukui, K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1971, 4, 57.
6122 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 71, No. 16, 2006