Rates of Small-Molecule Binding to W(CO)3(PCy3)2
A R T I C L E S
Thermodynamic and kinetic parameters for the addition
of small molecules such as H2, D2, and N2, to W (W )
mer,trans-W(CO)3(PCy3)2 and PCy3 ) tricyclohexylphosphine),
eq 1, have not been reported. However, Hoff’s group elegantly
employed stopped-flow kinetics7,8 to measure the indirect
substitution reaction of W-L (L ) H2 and N2) with pyridine
(py), evaluating kf(H ) and kf(N ) as (2.2 ( 0.3) × 106 and (5.0 (
assignments1,3,5,10 and our current IR observations, to simulate
and assign the electronic transitions in the UV-vis spectra, to
determine the nature of the HOMO and LUMO of W-L, and
to understand the agostic C-H interaction of the ligand vs
solvent σ C-H interaction.
Experimental Section
2
2
1.0) × 105 M-1 s-1, respectively, at 25 °C. Since reaction 1
with L ) py was too fast to follow under pseudo-first-order
conditions on a stopped-flow apparatus, they first accurately
determined the rate constant of reaction 1 with L ) P(OMe)3.
On the basis of the substitution reaction mechanism and its rate
Materials. W was prepared as previously described5 and character-
ized by NMR, UV-vis, and IR spectroscopy. No impurities were found
in the NMR and IR spectra except for a trace amount of W-CO, which
has previously been reported5 to be present in solutions of W. CH3CN
and pyridine were purified in the published manner,11 stored under
vacuum over activated molecular sieves, and then vacuum-distilled and
transferred in an Ar-filled glovebox just prior to sample preparation.
THF was purified in the published manner11 and stored under vacuum
over NaK. Toluene and hexane were distilled over sodium benzophe-
none ketyl and CaH2, respectively, under an Ar atmosphere and stored
in the glovebox. Ultrahigh purity H2, D2, N2, C2H4, CO, and Ar (Praxair)
were used without further purification. The solubilities of the various
gases in toluene and hexane were calculated from previously published
data.12 Accordingly, the following values at 25 °C and 1 atm partial
pressure of gas are used in this study: [H2] ) 2.97 and 4.80 mM in
toluene and hexane, respectively; [D2] ) 3.06 and 4.91 mM in toluene
and hexane,13 respectively; [N2] ) 5.37 and 10.7 mM in toluene and
hexane, respectively; [C2H4] ) 139 and 178 mM in toluene and hexane,
respectively.
law outlined in eqs 2 and 3, respectively, and k2(P(OMe) ) ) 5.45
3
× 104 M-1 s-1 in toluene at 25 °C, they calculated k2(py) ) 8.7
× 105 M-1 s-1 7,8
.
Substitution reaction 4 was used for the
evaluation of kf(H ) and kf(N )
.
2
2
kf(L)
W + L y z W-L
(1)
kr(L)
k2(P(OMe)
W-py yk z W + py
3)8 W-P(OMe)3 (2)
2(py)
k-2(py)
P(OMe)3
k2(py)k2(P(OMe) )[W - py][P(OMe)3]
d[W - py]
dt
3
)
(3)
(4)
k-2(py)[py] + k2(P(OMe) )[P(OMe)3]
3
Spectroscopic Measurements. UV-vis spectra were measured on
a Hewlett-Packard 8452A diode-array spectrophotometer. FTIR spectra
were recorded on a Bruker IFS 66/S spectrometer. NMR spectra were
measured on a Bruker UltraShield 400 MHz spectrometer. UV-vis
flash photolysis experiments were conducted using an apparatus
described previously,14,15 with excitation being provided by the third
harmonic (355 nm, ∼6 ns, ∼20 mJ/pulse) of a Continuum Surelite
I-10 Nd:YAG laser. These experiments were performed in toluene at
25 °C under 1 atm of Ar or under a known pressure of H2, D2, N2,
C2H4, or CO. The solutions containing 0.1-0.5 mM W-py or
0.5-1.0 mM W-NCCH3 were prepared using a known amount of py
or CH3CN, respectively, in a glovebox. The solutions containing
0.5-1.5 mM W-L (L ) H2, D2, N2, C2H4 or CO) were prepared by
adding a known pressure of L after having degassed the Ar-saturated
toluene solution of W. The kinetics of the signal-averaged data were
analyzed using Levenberg-Marquardt nonlinear least-squares routines
written in MATLAB. For the high-pressure work, the solution contain-
ing W-L (L ) H2, N2, or C2H4) was transferred via a syringe into a
vacuum-tight quartz pillbox optical cell,16-18 which had been flushed
with H2, N2, or C2H4 as in previous investigations.18,19 The solution
containing W-py or W-NCCH3 was transferred in a similar manner
under Ar. After removing the excess gas, the pillbox was immediately
placed inside the high-pressure cell, which was mounted on the laser
table.
W-L + py f W-py + L
Furthermore, they determined the enthalpies9 for reaction 1
in toluene by solution calorimetry (-9.9, -13.5, -15.1, -18.9,
-26.6, and -30.4 kcal mol-1 for L ) H2, N2, CH3CN, py,
P(OMe)3, and CO, respectively).
While the activation enthalpy (∆Hq) and entropy (∆Sq), and
the overall enthalpy (∆H°) and entropy (∆S°) changes for these
reactions using W and other complexes have been extensively
investigated using both calorimetric and stopped-flow tech-
niques, there is no information on the activation volume (∆Vq)
for the formation of dihydrogen, dinitrogen, or ethylene
complexes of W and other metal centers. Activation volumes
describe the volume changes that occur along the reaction
coordinate of a chemical process upon going to the transition
state, and can provide further information on the underlying
mechanism and the nature of the transition state, e.g. for small-
molecule addition to W with highly bulky PCy3 ligands. In the
present study we report direct measurements of rate constants
and activation volumes for the formation of W-L from W and
L. When a toluene or hexane solution containing W-L (L )
H2, D2, C2H4, N2, or CH3CN) and a known amount of L is
irradiated with a 355 nm laser pulse, W-L bond dissociation
takes place to form W. Subsequently, clean regeneration of
W-L is observed using time-resolved UV-vis and step-scan
FTIR (s2-FTIR) spectroscopy. In addition, we have performed
density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the B3LYP level
of theory on W with/without the agostic C-H interaction of
the PCy3 ligand and also on a series of model complexes,
mer,trans-W′-L (W′ ) W(CO)3(PH3)2; L ) H2, C2H4, N2, or
CO) in an effort to resolve discrepancies between earlier spectral
(10) Bender, B. R.; Kubas, G. J.; Jones, L. H.; Swanson, B. I.; Eckert, J.; Capps,
K. B.; Hoff, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9179-9190.
(11) Riddick, J. A.; Bunger, W. B.; Sakano, T. K. Organic SolVents: Physical
Properties and Methods of Purification, 4th ed.; Wiley: New York, 1986.
(12) Wilhelm, E.; Battino, R. Chem. ReV. 1973, 73, 1-9.
(13) Since we could not find any published data on the solubility of D2 in hexane,
this value has been estimated by scaling the solubility of H2 in hexane
according to the relative solubilities of D2 and H2 in heptane.
(14) Hamada, T.; Brunschwig, B. S.; Eifuku, E.; Fujita, E.; Korner, M.; Sasaki,
S.; van Eldik, R.; Wishart, J. F. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 5645-5654.
(15) Thompson, D. W.; Wishart, J. F.; Brunschwig, B. S.; Sutin, N. J. Phys.
Chem. A 2001, 105, 8117-8122.
(16) le Noble, W. J.; Schlott, R. ReV. Sci. Instrum. 1976, 47, 770-771.
(17) van Eldik, R. High-Pressure Kinetics: Fundamental and Experimental
Aspects. In Inorganic High-Pressure Chemistry: Kinetics and Mechanisms;
van Eldik, R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1986; Vol. 7, pp 8-11.
(18) Fujita, E.; van Eldik, R. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 360-362.
(19) Fujita, E.; Brunschwig, B. S.; Creutz, C.; Muckerman, J. T.; Sutin, N.;
Szalda, D.; van Eldik, R. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 1595-1603.
(7) Zhang, K.; Gonzalez, A. A.; Hoff, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111,
3627-3632.
(8) Gonzalez, A. A.; Zhang, K.; Hoff, C. D. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 4285-
4290.
(9) Gonzalez, A. A.; Zhang, K.; Nolan, S. P.; Delavega, R. L.; Mukerjee, S.
L.; Hoff, C. D.; Kubas, G. J. Organometallics 1988, 7, 2429-2435.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 49, 2006 15729