NEW meso-TETRAFLUORENYLETHYNYL PORPHYRIN PLATFORM
195
of the volatiles, purification of the residual solid was
Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 2975–9781. (h) Drouet S
and Paul-Roth CO. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 10693-
10700; (i) Paul-Roth CO, Williams JAG, Letessier
J and Simonneaux G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48:
4317–4322; (j) Yao D, Hugues V, Blanchard-Desce
M, Mongin O, Paul-Roth CO and Paul F. New J.
Chem. 2015; 39: 7730–7733; (k) Frampton MJ,
Magennis SW, Pillow JNG, Burn PL and Samuel
IDW. J. Mater. Chem. 2003; 13: 235–242; (l) Yao
D, Zhang X, Mongin O, Paul F and Paul-Roth
CO. Chem. — Eur. J. 2016; 22: 5583–5597; (m)
Yao D, Zhang X, Triadon A, Richy N, Mongin O,
Blanchard-Desce M, Paul F and Paul-Roth CO.
Chem. — Eur. J. 2017; 23: 2635–2647.
done by silica chromatography using a THF/heptane
(1:10) mixture as eluent. TAFlP was collected as a green
powder (10 mg, 3% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3):
dH, ppm 9.69 (s, 8H, Hb-pyrrolic), 8.11 (d, 8H, J = 10.5 Hz,
H1,3), 7.96 (d, 4H, J = 7.6 Hz, H4), 7.88–7.85 (m, 4H,
H5), 7.51–7.43 (m, 12H, H6,7,8), 2.30–2.15 (m, 16H, Ha),
1.25–1.17 (m, 16H, Hc), 0.78 (t, 24H, J = 7.3 Hz Hd),
0.75–0.62 (m, 16H, Hb), -1.36 (s, 2H, NH). 13C{1H}NMR
(400 MHz, CD2Cl2, ppm): d = 151.3, 151.2, 142.4, 140.5,
131.1, 127.9, 127.0, 126.1, 123.1, 121.7, 120.1, 103.1,
55.4, 40.3, 29.7, 26.2, 23.2, 13.7. UV-vis (lmax, CH2Cl2,
nm): 319, 479, 661, 748. HRMS-ESI for C112H111N4:
m/z = 1511.8797 [M + H]+ (calcd: 1511.88033).
2. (a) Wagner RW and Lindsey JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994; 116: 9759–9760; (b) Anderson HL. Inorg.
Chem. 1994; 33: 972–981.
CONCLUSIONS
3. Arnold DP and Nitschinsk LJ. Tetrahedron 1992;
48: 8781–8792.
4. LeCours SM, Guan HW, DiMagno SG, Wang CH
and Therien JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996; 118:
1497–1503.
5. Anderson HL, Martin SJ and Bradley DDC. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994; 33: 655–657.
6. Wagner RW, Johnson TE, Li F and Lindsey IS.
J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 5266–5273.
7. Lin VSY, DiMagno SG and Thérien JM. Science,
1994; 264: 1105–1111.
8. Anderson HL and Sanders JKM. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. Engl. 1990; 29: 1400–1403.
9. Anderson HL and Sanders JKM. J. Chem. Soc.
Chem. Commun. 1992: 946–947.
10. Mackay LG, Anderson HL and Sanders JKM. J.
Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1992: 43–44.
11. Anderson HL. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992; 33:
1101–1104.
We have successfully synthesized and characterized
the new meso-tetra-fluorenylethynylporphyrin derivative
(TAFlP). Linear optical measurements reveal better
conjugation between the porphyrin core and the
peripheral fluorenyl-containing antennae, compared to
the TFP-Bu core. This results from the presence of an
yne linkage at the meso positions which allows more
planar conformations. We now look forward to using
similar central platforms for the design of new families
of dendrimers. We hope that the extended and more
conjugated p manifold, besides providing a desirable red-
shift for theranostic applications and high fluorescence
for imaging, will also enhance the 2PA of the central core
allowing for more efficient photosensitizers to be made.
For the moment, extensive studies of the NLO properties
of TAFlP are in progress to verify this point.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge China Scholarship Council
(CSC) for PhD funding (XZ). The authors acknowledge
Dr Frédéric PAUL, Dr Olivier MONGIN for fruitful
discussion and exchange. This project was partially
supported by the departmental committees CD35 and
CD85 of the “Ligue contre le Cancer du Grand-Ouest”.
12. Milgrom LR and Yahioglu G. Tetrahedron Lett.
1995; 36: 9061–9064.
13. Milgrom LR and Yahioglu G. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996; 37: 4069–4072.
14. Milgrom LR and Yahioglu G. Adv. Mater. 1997; 9:
313–315.
15. Henari FZ, Blau WJ, Milgrom LE, Yahioglu G,
Phillips WG and Lacey JA. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997;
267: 229–233.
REFERENCES
1. (a) Szaciłowski K, MacykW, Drzewiecka-Matuszek
A, Brindell M and Stochel G. Chem. Rev. 2005;
105: 2647–2694; (b) Du B, Fortin D and Harvey
PD. Inorg. Chem. 2011; 50: 11493–11505; (c) Li
B, Xu X and Sun M. Macromolecules 2006; 39:
456–461; (d) Harth EM, Hecht S, Helms B, Malm-
strom EE, Fréchet JM and Hawker CJ. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124: 3926–3938; (e) Sun M and Bo Z.
J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2007; 45:
111–124; (f) Kozaki M, Morita S, Suzuki S and
Okada K. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 9447–9457;
(g) Drouet S, Paul-Roth C and Simonneaux G.
16. Proess G, Pankert D and Hevesi L. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992; 33: 269–272.
17. Bugarin A and Connell BT. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015;
56: 3285–3287.
18. Lacey J, Philipps D, Milgrom LE, Yahioglu G and
Rees RD. Photochem. Photobiol. 1998; 67: 97–100.
19. Goldberg PK, Pundsack TJ and Splan KE. J. Phys.
Chem. A 2011; 115: 10452–10460.
20. Perrin DD, Armarego WLF. Purification of Labora-
tory Chemicals, 3rd edn., Pergamon Press, Oxford,
1988.
Copyright © 2019 World Scientific Publishing Company
J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2019; 23: 195–195